01.03.2013 Views

Lessons Not Learned - The Innocence Project

Lessons Not Learned - The Innocence Project

Lessons Not Learned - The Innocence Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FALse ConFessIons oR ADMIssIons<br />

In 25% of DNA exonerations nationwide, innocent defendants made<br />

incriminating statements, confessed or pled guilty. <strong>The</strong> rate of false<br />

confession or admission is even greater in New York, where it was a<br />

factor in 10 of the 23 DNA wrongful convictions overturned by DNA.<br />

A variety of factors can contribute to a false confession or admission<br />

during a police interrogation. Some people falsely confess under duress<br />

or because they fear violence. Sometimes, people are told that<br />

they will receive a harsher sentence if they do not confess. In many<br />

cases, people who have a diminished capacity because of mental or<br />

physical impairments falsely confess because they do not understand<br />

the situation or because their limited cognitive capabilities cause<br />

them to want to please authority figures. In many false confession<br />

cases, jurors are told that defendants knew details of a crime that only<br />

the perpetrator could know – when, in fact, defendants learned those<br />

details from police in the course of an interrogation or gave multiple<br />

guesses about the details during an interrogation before giving the<br />

“correct” answer. Wrongful convictions in New York resulting from<br />

false confessions or admissions include:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Douglas Warney became a suspect in a 1996 Rochester<br />

murder after he called the police to tell them he had information<br />

about the killing. After police interrogated him<br />

for 12 hours and supplied him with non-public details<br />

about the crime scene, Warney confessed to his involvement<br />

in the murder. His confession, however, was full of<br />

inconsistencies, such as the location of the crime, disposal<br />

of clothing and the participation of another person who<br />

could not have been present. Warney, who has a history<br />

of mental issues and an eighth-grade education, was<br />

convicted and sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. He<br />

was released and exonerated in 2006 after DNA from the<br />

crime scene matched the profile of a New York inmate,<br />

who admitted that he killed the victim alone.<br />

After supposed confessions that should have raised serious<br />

questions by police and prosecutors, five New York<br />

City teenagers – Yusef Salaam, Kevin Richardson, Antron<br />

McCray, Raymond Santana and Kharey Wise – were con-<br />

22 THe InnoCenCe PRoJeCT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!