01.03.2013 Views

Lessons Not Learned - The Innocence Project

Lessons Not Learned - The Innocence Project

Lessons Not Learned - The Innocence Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eating away at the interior of the hair shaft. Advanced banding occurs<br />

only after death and only when the hair is still attached to the decomposing<br />

body, meaning that the victim could not have deposited the<br />

hairs while she was alive and supposedly in Restivo’s van.<br />

At the time of trial, research on advanced banding was relatively new<br />

and no studies had been published about it. <strong>The</strong> state called its own<br />

expert, who testified to the limits of contemporary research, and<br />

argued in closing that “for all anyone knows, banding occurs right<br />

after death, as when the heart stops and the lungs stop working and<br />

the blood settles.”<br />

In addition to Kogut’s confession and the two hairs, the state presented<br />

the testimony of multiple witnesses who alleged that they had<br />

heard Restivo and Halstead make incriminating statements. Both<br />

men were ultimately convicted.<br />

Post-Conviction<br />

Centurion Ministries began working on behalf of all three defendants<br />

in 1994. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Innocence</strong> <strong>Project</strong> began working on Restivo’s<br />

case in 1997. In the postconviction proceedings that secured the defendants’<br />

release, Kogut was represented by Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering<br />

and Centurion Ministries and Halstead was represented by Pace<br />

Law School’s Postconviction Clinic.<br />

DNA testing in this case went through many rounds over a period of<br />

ten years, despite repeated exclusions of all three men. <strong>The</strong> prosecution<br />

initially argued that the samples tested (vaginal slides) were not<br />

the “best” samples available and could have failed to detect semen<br />

from the defendants present on the original swabs. In 2003, however,<br />

the defense team obtained property records from the police department<br />

which led to the discovery of an intact vaginal swab that had<br />

never been tested. STR testing on the spermatozoa on the vaginal<br />

swab matched the single unknown male profile from the prior testing<br />

and again excluded all three men.<br />

In addition, defense attorneys also secured an affidavit from the<br />

state’s expert witness, who had testified in 1986 regarding the hairs<br />

found in Restivo’s van. <strong>The</strong> expert concluded, based on 20 years of<br />

research and expertise, that the hairs displayed “post-mortem root<br />

banding,” a hallmark of decomposition that only occurs while hairs<br />

are attached to a corpse that has been dead for at least 8 hours, if not<br />

66 THe InnoCenCe PRoJeCT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!