09.03.2013 Views

Common Ground - Western Reserve Land Conservancy

Common Ground - Western Reserve Land Conservancy

Common Ground - Western Reserve Land Conservancy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At A Glance<br />

* The scarcity of public funding was identified<br />

* Hydraulic fracturing and directional drilling<br />

* Our region’s population peaked in 1970 at<br />

* Restoring degraded natural systems is more<br />

* One study shows that if we moved our share<br />

* The demolition of homes in urban neigh-<br />

by 81% of our survey respondents as one of<br />

the biggest challenges facing land conservation<br />

over the next three years.<br />

in the Utica Point Pleasant formation are<br />

creating one of the largest challenges ever<br />

for conservation in northern Ohio.<br />

more than 4.2 million people. While the<br />

population has declined since that time, we<br />

have continued to develop 8% more of our<br />

land, according to land cover surveys.<br />

expensive than preserving and managing<br />

intact ones.<br />

of locally sourced food from the current 1%<br />

to 25%, we could create 27,000 new jobs.<br />

borhoods will give us a second chance to<br />

establish more green space, farm in unconventional<br />

areas and otherwise look at our<br />

land use in creative and innovative ways.<br />

44 CHAPTER 5 CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES LOOM<br />

CHAPTER 5<br />

Challenges and opportunities loom<br />

T he land conservation community clearly faces major<br />

challenges as it looks to the future.<br />

In our survey, we asked the land-protection partners in the<br />

region what they saw as the biggest challenges or obstacles<br />

facing land protection and restoration over the next three<br />

years. Eighty-one percent of the respondents indicated the<br />

biggest issue was the scarcity of available public funds.<br />

It was by far the most common answer, followed by the<br />

scarcity of philanthropic funds, which was identified by<br />

44.4% of the respondents.<br />

But it would be a mistake to assume all would be right with<br />

the regional land-protection world if we solved those two<br />

problems.<br />

A host of other challenges – some emerging, some longstanding<br />

– are looming: oil and gas drilling, sprawl, a lack<br />

of coordination among conservation groups, climate change,<br />

poor government and public works policies, environmental<br />

insensitivity and a lack of public awareness of the value<br />

of land protection. One respondent described the biggest<br />

challenge as “economic development at any cost and the<br />

general ecological illiteracy of the culture.”<br />

Many survey respondents saw significant opportunities to<br />

improve land protection over the next three years. Nearly<br />

63% of our respondents indicated the key was increasing<br />

landowner awareness of the conservation-easement option,<br />

while nearly 55% said the region’s conservation groups<br />

need to create a common goal and plan. “I think a strong<br />

message about the value of protection needs to be agreed<br />

upon and actively promoted,” one wrote.<br />

How the conservation community responds to challenges<br />

will largely determine how successful we are in preserving<br />

vital natural resources, farmland and other key properties<br />

over the next decade.<br />

The public’s view of conservation<br />

There is a varying degree of public support for land<br />

protection throughout our region.<br />

Based on our survey of land protection professionals, 58%<br />

of our local communities are moderately to extremely<br />

supportive of land conservation. Less than 10% have<br />

reported local communities that are moderately opposed to<br />

land conservation. Counties with levy-backed park districts<br />

tend to be well supported by the people they serve. But five<br />

of the 14 counties in our service area (36%), have no levy<br />

support for their county park district.<br />

The Clean Ohio program continues to get strong voter<br />

support for continued funding, even during difficult<br />

economic times. In a survey of Ohio voters conducted by<br />

Public Opinion Strategies during late spring 2011, 55% of<br />

voters in the Cleveland media market expressed a desire to<br />

maintain funding for the Clean Ohio while 37% opposed<br />

it. Nationally, conservation has gained some traction. For<br />

example, during the November 2010 election, 28 of the 35<br />

proposals for conservation funding were passed by voters,<br />

an 80% approval rate. This amounted to approximately $2<br />

billion for conservation work nationally, according to the<br />

Trust for Public <strong>Land</strong> and the Hewlett Foundation.<br />

Government policies, funding are critical<br />

It is not financially feasible for most landowners to donate<br />

their land or conservation easements, so public funding<br />

programs that support land and easement purchases<br />

plus “bargain sales” – sales made at below-market value<br />

for the purpose of making a donation – are essential<br />

to the protection of special places in our communities.<br />

Conservation easements, which severely limit or prohibit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!