GSV2 LSC-Report-VPA1 - MyClimate

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation <strong>Report</strong> 8. I’m impressed: locally most people understands even more about the solar energy I ever expected ( 0 / 1) B) What do you like about the project? 1. The project is (very) good/ I like everything ( 18 / 3 ) 2. The project has many benefits ( 7 / 3 ) 3. The project activity provides better light / there is no more darkness ( 22 / 0 ) 4. It improves health of rural people ( 3 / 0 ) 5. It reduces the carbon emissions ( 5 / 2 ) 6. It reaches the poor people in the rural areas ( 6 / 12 ) 7. I like the service/ work of Solar Energy Foundation ( 6 / 3 ) 8. Specific products, like Solar Home System, Solar lamps, mobile chargers, Solar TV ( 12/ 0) 9. The financing mechanism of Revolving Fund ( 0 / 5 ) 10. The training offered by Solar Energy Foundation at the Solar Energy School ( 0 / 3 ) 11. “That we no longer use kerosene lamps and that we have pure water here” ( 1 / 0 ) 12. “You save me from buying kerosene and batteries” ( 1 / 0 ) 13. “The project is special, because you cover demand which is difficult to do for the government” ( 1 / 0 ) 14. “I hope other NGOs will learn from your project” ( 0 / 1 ) C) What do you not like about the project? 1. Nothing ( 73 / 14 ) 2. Specific products, like Solar Home System, Solar lamp, Solar TV ( 4 / 0 ) 3. Too low volume of provided products / size should be expanded ( 1 / 2 ) 4. Product pricing for Solar TV / fear of products could be not affordable for everyone ( 2 / 3 ) 5. People could use solar systems not properly ( 1 / 0 ) 6. Maintenance of solar system should be organized fast ( 1 / 0 ) 7. “Your information baseline about community sample taking is not clear” ( 0 / 1) 8. “The project is good but what I dislike is it may affect soil a little bit” ( 0 / 1 ) 9. “The scoring method is very much conservative and you should have done more concrete” (0 / 1) 10. “I do not like the way the project is working with EEPA (Ethiopian Electric Power Authority), the project should assess initially in order not to have duplication of electrification (whatever the source may be) of a village.” ( 0 / 1 ) 11. “The project is not solving our major problem like energy we need in the kitchen for cooking, because we loose many tons of wood per year. We need to reduce that resource.” ( 0 / 1 ) D) Other comments 1. Try to reach more people / continue with your activities / provide more products ( 26 / 4 ) 2. Make the products more affordable / extend loan period ( 18 / 0 ) 3. Thanks for your work ( 7 / 0 ) 4. The project is very good ( 6 / 1 ) 5. Provide us with the latest technology ( 5 / 0 ) 6. Please repeat meetings like this / intensify exchange with stakeholders & other organizations, Gold Standard Passport version 2.1 July 2009 20
Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Consultation <strong>Report</strong> which could learn from you ( 6 / 6 ) 7. Specific product / product quality request or comment ( 4 / 2 ) 8. Please provide immediate maintenance services ( 1 / 0 ) 9. Please provide a copy of the presentation ( 0 / 1 ) 10. Your project helps also to reduce pressure on forests, because of lower usage of firewood ( 0 / 1 ) 11. “Our rural people has also problem with respect to water supply. Please expand your project to solar energy water pumps.” ( 0 / 1 ) 12. Do projects that give priority to our problem: saving [natural] resources. ( 0 / 1 ) 13. “I fear that the project stops without finishing like other private companies & NGOs” ( 0 / 1) 14. Financial problems could be reduced by producing components for solar systems in Ethiopia (0/1) 15. Due to the shortage of electric power, it is better if you consider the urban areas with 100% pay (0 / 1) Some of the answers were given regarding other activities of the Solar Energy Foundation, like Sales of Solar TV, or regarding other topics, which are not addressed within the project (solar cooking, solar water pumps…). Please find our answers to these comments in section C.3.iii of this report. In Annex 2 you can find some representative examples from both meetings. Gold Standard Passport version 2.1 July 2009 21
Page 1 and 2: GOLD STANDARD LOCAL STAKEHOLDER CON
Page 3 and 4: A. 2. Current project status Gold S
Page 5 and 6: Gold Standard Local Stakeholder Con
Page 7 and 8: iii. Invitation tracking table Gold
Page 11 and 12: No Code Gold Standard Local Stakeho
Page 17 and 18: No. Cat. First Name Second Name Gol
Page 19: No. Cat. First Name Second Name Gol
Page 29 and 30: Too low volume of provided products
Page 33 and 34: 6) The project does not employ and
Page 35 and 36: Sustainable development matrix Gold
Page 41 and 42: Water quality and quantity Gold Sta
Page 43 and 44: Balance of payments and investment

GSV2 LSC-Report-VPA1 - MyClimate

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?