20.03.2013 Views

Consent Cease and Desist Order No. CCC-13 - State of California

Consent Cease and Desist Order No. CCC-13 - State of California

Consent Cease and Desist Order No. CCC-13 - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CCC</strong>-<strong>13</strong>-CD-02 & <strong>CCC</strong>-<strong>13</strong>-RO-02 (Caribbean)<br />

fuel modification, <strong>and</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the project, including by requiring the elimination <strong>of</strong> a<br />

tennis court <strong>and</strong> associated structures, <strong>and</strong> golf cart path originally proposed on the lower<br />

western portion <strong>of</strong> the property with the other proposed development.<br />

On August 18, 2005, Coastal Commissioners appealed the development on the project<br />

site approved by the City. On September 16, 2005, the Commission found that the appeal<br />

raised substantial issues <strong>and</strong> overturned the City’s approval <strong>of</strong> the local coastal<br />

development permit.<br />

The project design was subsequently reduced <strong>and</strong> modified since the original appeal. At<br />

the April 2012 meeting, when at the time the property owner was Mehrdad Safari, the<br />

Commission approved the reduced <strong>and</strong> modified project. The approved project consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> the following: grading <strong>and</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> a 14,017 square foot, two-story, singlefamily<br />

residence <strong>and</strong> two separate one-story accessory buildings.<br />

A geotechnical investigation prepared by a previous owner’s geotechnical consultant<br />

(dated <strong>No</strong>vember 11, 2003) indicates that there are four areas <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>slides on the site.<br />

Three <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>slides are located near the front property line contiguous to Caribbean<br />

Drive. In addition to the residence on the subject property, development authorized by the<br />

CDP includes a new driveway (supported by caissons) leading to the residence from<br />

Caribbean Drive <strong>and</strong> remediation <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>slide areas along Caribbean Drive by excavating<br />

<strong>and</strong> installing a seismically stable keyway, compacted soil, geogrid <strong>and</strong> plantable crib<br />

retaining wall system with native vegetation (up to 20-feet in height). The plantable crib<br />

retaining walls will visually blend with the l<strong>and</strong>scaped slopes to enhance the appearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the neighborhood including the rectified l<strong>and</strong>slide areas, as required by the City.<br />

The residence <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>slide remediation structures are approved on the eastern portion <strong>of</strong><br />

the subject property, generally separate from the areas impacted by the unpermitted<br />

development at issue, which are located for the most part on the western portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

site. The l<strong>and</strong>slide supported by the unpermitted buttress at issue is located at the upper<br />

northwest corner <strong>of</strong> the western portion <strong>of</strong> the site. Since this area is covered with ESHA<br />

<strong>and</strong> no new development is proposed in this location, remediation <strong>of</strong> this l<strong>and</strong>slide was<br />

not reviewed as part <strong>of</strong> the CDP application. However, the Commission staff geologist<br />

does note that the l<strong>and</strong>slide buttress is currently functioning to stabilize the site <strong>and</strong> its<br />

removal or modification could result in geological instability <strong>and</strong> consequent impacts to<br />

ESHA resulting from potential slope failure, as well as disturbance from installation <strong>of</strong><br />

any necessary remedial measures.<br />

In approving the CDP, the Commission found that development had occurred on the<br />

subject property project without required Coastal Act authorizations, including the<br />

development described above in Section V.A. The CDP authorizes Respondent to restore<br />

native scrub habitat that was impacted by the unpermitted development. Through<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the required restoration program, Respondent will restore <strong>and</strong> enhance<br />

a minimum <strong>of</strong> 1.9 acres <strong>of</strong> native scrub habitat on-site with CSS <strong>and</strong> SMC. In addition to<br />

the habitat restoration <strong>and</strong> enhancement, Respondent will preserve an existing 8.6-acre<br />

area <strong>of</strong> habitat on site that includes ESHA.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!