Assessment of the Automation Algorithm for TDR Bridge - Ohio ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Page 1 of 8 Traffic Survey Report 12/29/2006 file://X:\TC\Traffic ...$

Sonar (cont.) • wave frequency 200 kHz • beam width Illustration of transducer beamwidth (Muller and Landers 1999) Effect of beamwidth on measured depth (Muller and Landers 1999) 26
Sonar (cont.) • Data Acquisition • Limitations Fathometer data recorded with 200 kHz transducer (fathometer n.d.) 1. at least 3 m and velocities less than 4 m/s 2. turbulence, air entrainment, and heavy suspendedsediment 3. noise from multiple reflections, and echoes from the shoreline, water bottom, and/or piers 27
Page 1 and 2: ODOT Project Review Session Present
Page 3 and 4: Introduction 1.1 Motivation for Bri
Page 5 and 6: Classification • General Scour
Page 7 and 8: Local Scour • Pier scour and abut
Page 9 and 10: Physical Modeling Parameters relate
Page 11 and 12: Numerical Simulation • 1D simulat
Page 13 and 14: Field observation • A co-operativ
Page 15 and 16: Literature review: scour monitoring
Page 17 and 18: 2.1 Motivation for Scour Instrument
Page 19 and 20: • Lagasse and Price 1997 NCHRP Pr
Page 21 and 22: • Mueller and Landers 1999 PVC-po
Page 23 and 24: National practice of scour monitori
Page 25: Sonar (cont.) A sonar system for br
Page 29 and 30: Time Domain Reflectometry Dowding a
Page 31 and 32: Reflection at Interface Reflection
Page 33 and 34: Outline • Introduction • Litera
Page 35 and 36: Experiment Setup and Procedure •
Page 37 and 38: Voltage(V) Test results 0.4 0.0 -0.
Page 39 and 40: 3.2 Algorithms for TDR Signal Inter
Page 41 and 42: Mixing Formula for Electrical Condu
Page 43 and 44: sqrt(Ka)/sqrt(kw) Empirical Equatio
Page 45 and 46: River condition assessment • Elec
Page 47 and 48: Results by Using Design Equation
Page 49 and 50: Scour Estimation Based on Detecting
Page 51 and 52: Sample results 0.01 0 -0.01 -0.02 F
Page 53 and 54: Monitoring of Simulated Scour in Va
Page 55 and 56: Normalized dielectric constant 1.0
Page 57 and 58: Normalized dielectric constant 1.0
Page 59 and 60: TDR measurements of scour for diffe
Page 61 and 62: Scour Monitoring in Water of High E
Page 63 and 64: Dielectric constant by insulated pr
Page 65 and 66: Effect of air bubbles on dielectric
Page 67 and 68: Scour monitoring in water with vary
Page 69 and 70: A Comparison of TDR and Ultrasound
Page 71 and 72: Voltage(V) Results 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.
Page 73 and 74: ECb,w(ms/m) Electric conductivity o
Page 75 and 76: Outline • Introduction • Litera
Page 77 and 78:
5.2 Use of FEMLAB for TDR Probe Des
Page 79 and 80:
Electric field, Case I 79
Page 81 and 82:
• Effective measured dielectric c
Page 83 and 84:
Sampling area ∫∫ Ω ∑ 100 ×
Page 85 and 86:
5.3 Coated TDR CS605 Moisture Probe
Page 87 and 88:
Lab Evaluation of Strip Scour Senso
Page 89 and 90:
FEMLAB Analysis of the Performance
Page 91 and 92:
Electric potential Sensor in water
Page 93 and 94:
Sampling area, saturate sand Field
Page 95 and 96:
Scour measurement TDR measured scou
Page 97 and 98:
Laboratory Observations and Algorit
Page 99 and 100:
Evaluation of TDR under Various Con
Page 101 and 102:
Future work •Continue to develop
Page 103 and 104:
Acknowledgement • Ohio Department
Page 106:
Connection to another scour monitor
show all

Assessment of the Automation Algorithm for TDR Bridge - Ohio ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?