Assessment of the Automation Algorithm for TDR Bridge - Ohio ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Page 1 of 8 Traffic Survey Report 12/29/2006 file://X:\TC\Traffic ...$

TDR measurements of scour for different sediments (based on electric conductivity) Normalized TDR measured thickness of sediment layer 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 Fine sand in tap water Fine sand in 250ppm NaCl solution Fine sand in 500ppm NaCl solution Fine sand in 750ppm NaCl solution Coarse sand in 500ppm NaCl solution Gravel in tap water Gravel in 500ppm NaCl solution Washed coarse sand in 500ppm NaCl solution +5% error Washed gravel in 500ppm NaCl solution Coarse sand and gravel mixture in 500ppm NaCl solution -5% error 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Normalized physically measured thickness of sediment layer TDR measurements (electric conductivity) versus physical measurements (cm ruler) of thickness of sediment layer for all sediments. 60
Scour Monitoring in Water of High Electrical Conductivity Waveform before and after using insulated probe (Drnevich et al. 2003) 61
Page 1 and 2:
ODOT Project Review Session Present
Page 3 and 4:
Introduction 1.1 Motivation for Bri
Page 5 and 6:
Classification • General Scour
Page 7 and 8:
Local Scour • Pier scour and abut
Page 9 and 10: Physical Modeling Parameters relate
Page 11 and 12: Numerical Simulation • 1D simulat
Page 13 and 14: Field observation • A co-operativ
Page 15 and 16: Literature review: scour monitoring
Page 17 and 18: 2.1 Motivation for Scour Instrument
Page 19 and 20: • Lagasse and Price 1997 NCHRP Pr
Page 21 and 22: • Mueller and Landers 1999 PVC-po
Page 23 and 24: National practice of scour monitori
Page 25 and 26: Sonar (cont.) A sonar system for br
Page 27 and 28: Sonar (cont.) • Data Acquisition
Page 29 and 30: Time Domain Reflectometry Dowding a
Page 31 and 32: Reflection at Interface Reflection
Page 33 and 34: Outline • Introduction • Litera
Page 35 and 36: Experiment Setup and Procedure •
Page 37 and 38: Voltage(V) Test results 0.4 0.0 -0.
Page 39 and 40: 3.2 Algorithms for TDR Signal Inter
Page 41 and 42: Mixing Formula for Electrical Condu
Page 43 and 44: sqrt(Ka)/sqrt(kw) Empirical Equatio
Page 45 and 46: River condition assessment • Elec
Page 47 and 48: Results by Using Design Equation
Page 49 and 50: Scour Estimation Based on Detecting
Page 51 and 52: Sample results 0.01 0 -0.01 -0.02 F
Page 53 and 54: Monitoring of Simulated Scour in Va
Page 55 and 56: Normalized dielectric constant 1.0
Page 57 and 58: Normalized dielectric constant 1.0
Page 59: TDR measurements of scour for diffe
Page 63 and 64: Dielectric constant by insulated pr
Page 65 and 66: Effect of air bubbles on dielectric
Page 67 and 68: Scour monitoring in water with vary
Page 69 and 70: A Comparison of TDR and Ultrasound
Page 71 and 72: Voltage(V) Results 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.
Page 73 and 74: ECb,w(ms/m) Electric conductivity o
Page 75 and 76: Outline • Introduction • Litera
Page 77 and 78: 5.2 Use of FEMLAB for TDR Probe Des
Page 79 and 80: Electric field, Case I 79
Page 81 and 82: • Effective measured dielectric c
Page 83 and 84: Sampling area ∫∫ Ω ∑ 100 ×
Page 85 and 86: 5.3 Coated TDR CS605 Moisture Probe
Page 87 and 88: Lab Evaluation of Strip Scour Senso
Page 89 and 90: FEMLAB Analysis of the Performance
Page 91 and 92: Electric potential Sensor in water
Page 93 and 94: Sampling area, saturate sand Field
Page 95 and 96: Scour measurement TDR measured scou
Page 97 and 98: Laboratory Observations and Algorit
Page 99 and 100: Evaluation of TDR under Various Con
Page 101 and 102: Future work •Continue to develop
Page 103 and 104: Acknowledgement • Ohio Department
Page 106: Connection to another scour monitor
show all

Assessment of the Automation Algorithm for TDR Bridge - Ohio ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?