22.03.2013 Views

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Government to better meet the scheme’s objectives, or to provide<br />

any information on the effect of OLEC’s advice to the States in<br />

relation to Commonwealth reimbursement of payments for alreadyprohibited<br />

firearms.<br />

Conclusion<br />

3 55 <strong>The</strong> scheme was implemented promptly, but there were some<br />

unintended consequences. <strong>The</strong>se included the surrender of<br />

already-prohibited weapons and significant quantities of spare<br />

parts for them. On OLEC’s advice, the States paid compensation<br />

for these weapons. However, OLEC did not consult or<br />

communicate with other elements of the Attorney-General’s<br />

Department when making this decision to broaden the scope of the<br />

compensation scheme. OLEC acknowledged that in doing so it<br />

had overlooked the legislative requirements of the 1996 Act.<br />

3 56 Based on information provided by relevant State officials, the<br />

ANAO estimated that, of the $304 million paid by the States in<br />

compensation, at least $7.5 million was paid on the basis of funds<br />

advanced by the Commonwealth for weapons and parts which<br />

were not included in the definition of qualifying compensation in the<br />

1996 Act.<br />

3 57 <strong>The</strong> Attorney-General's Department officers responsible for<br />

authorising payments were not aware that OLEC had advised the<br />

States that the Commonwealth would reimburse compensation<br />

paid for already-prohibited firearms. Although continued<br />

authorisation of payments to the States was not in breach of the<br />

1996 Act, the ANAO considers that the Attorney-General's<br />

Department officers’ lack of knowledge of OLEC’s policy decision<br />

affecting the scheme indicates an evident weakness in the<br />

management control framework.<br />

3 58 <strong>The</strong> ANAO also noted that OLEC’s ad hoc approach to<br />

compensation policy on already-prohibited firearms and the advice<br />

to the States resulted in variations between the States in the<br />

amounts paid for already-prohibited firearms and in the types of<br />

weapons for which compensation was paid.<br />

3 59 As well, the monitoring of the scheme was not sufficient to help the<br />

Attorney-General's Department assess the achievements of the<br />

program and if necessary recommend changes to the Government<br />

to better meet the scheme’s objectives, or to provide any<br />

information on the effect of OLEC’s advice to the States in relation<br />

52 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Gun</strong> <strong>Buy</strong>-<strong>Back</strong> <strong>Scheme</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!