22.03.2013 Views

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Attorney-General’s Department advised the ANAO that this<br />

arose because their Financial Management Branch reported the<br />

total amount of funds advanced to the States, while OLEC’s reports<br />

to the Attorney-General focussed on the total amount paid by the<br />

States in compensation. This indicates that monitoring of program<br />

expenditure was undertaken at an appropriately senior level.<br />

<strong>Audit</strong> and acquittal<br />

3 76 For the purposes of accountability, it is important that<br />

arrangements for audit and acquittal are clearly defined and<br />

understood by relevant parties. In its planning advice, the ANAO<br />

advised the OLEC that States should be required to provide, on<br />

completion of the scheme, a final audited return detailing total<br />

amounts received and expended, supported by a reconciliation of<br />

firearms acquired, paid for and destroyed.<br />

3 77 At the time of this audit in mid-1997, arrangements for the final<br />

audit and acquittal of State compensation payments for firearms<br />

surrender transactions had not been clearly defined by the<br />

Attorney-General’s Department. <strong>The</strong> Department advised the<br />

ANAO that it was the Department’s expectation that relevant State<br />

<strong>Audit</strong>ors-General were ensuring compliance. However, the<br />

ANAO’s discussions with representatives of those offices indicated<br />

that, with the exception of Tasmania, there was no formal<br />

involvement by State <strong>Audit</strong>ors-General in the acquittance of State<br />

expenditure of buy-back funds. <strong>The</strong> ANAO concluded that specific<br />

arrangements for independent audit and acquittal differ between<br />

States but were not clearly known to the Attorney-General's<br />

Department.<br />

Conclusion<br />

3 78 Although there were weaknesses in internal management control<br />

and there was a need to amend the 1996 Act, payments to the<br />

States were made legally. <strong>The</strong> Attorney-General’s Department<br />

managed payments to the States efficiently and effectively.<br />

However, the ANAO found that there was scope to clarify<br />

arrangements for final audit and acquittal of State expenditure of<br />

gun buy-back funds.<br />

Recommendation No.1<br />

3 79 <strong>The</strong> ANAO recommends that in order to ensure accountability for<br />

the scheme, the Attorney-General's Department clarifies<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Gun</strong> <strong>Buy</strong>-<strong>Back</strong> <strong>Scheme</strong> 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!