22.03.2013 Views

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AFP comment<br />

3 95 Under the Complaints (<strong>Australian</strong> Federal Police) Act 1981 there is<br />

a specific requirement to clear the matter leading to the audit with<br />

the Commonwealth Ombudsman before notifying any<br />

recommendation or perceived action to the parties who are the<br />

subject of that action. In this case the Ombudsman determined the<br />

matter on 25 March 1997 and the Internal <strong>Audit</strong> draft report was<br />

issued on 8 May 1997. <strong>The</strong> recommendations of the internal audit<br />

have either been completed or are nearing completion. While<br />

some computer modifications have been made, further<br />

enhancements now also form part of a wider AFP computer<br />

development program.<br />

ANAO sample testing of transactions<br />

3 96 As with the AFP internal audit work, the ANAO’s testing of a<br />

sample of firearms surrender transactions identified some<br />

procedural inaccuracies. <strong>The</strong> ANAO reviewed all records of<br />

transfer of firearms for disposal which existed at the time of audit.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se amounted to about 3350 surrendered weapons. About 2<br />

per cent of these (76 records) did not show clear evidence of the<br />

transfer to Firearms and Ballistics Branch (F and B Branch) for<br />

disposal.<br />

3 97 Some entries on destruction schedules were annotated by<br />

F and B Branch as ‘not received’, while others were simply crossed<br />

out without explanatory annotation. Reference to the relevant<br />

computer record did not provide information as to its location.<br />

3 98 In all cases the ANAO subsequently found adequate evidence of<br />

despatch for destruction on other destruction schedules or of<br />

retention in the F&B ballistic library, or physically located the<br />

weapon where it had been retained within the Weapons Registry.<br />

3 99 Retention had been justified either:<br />

• pending valuation or dispute of valuation; or<br />

• for AFP training or display purposes.<br />

3 100 <strong>The</strong> ANAO found that some weapons had been deleted from<br />

destruction schedules because the relevant weapon was not<br />

physically present in a batch of weapons. This had occurred<br />

because:<br />

64 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Gun</strong> <strong>Buy</strong>-<strong>Back</strong> <strong>Scheme</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!