Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office
Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office
Gun Buy Back Scheme - The Australian National Audit Office
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
AFP comment<br />
3 95 Under the Complaints (<strong>Australian</strong> Federal Police) Act 1981 there is<br />
a specific requirement to clear the matter leading to the audit with<br />
the Commonwealth Ombudsman before notifying any<br />
recommendation or perceived action to the parties who are the<br />
subject of that action. In this case the Ombudsman determined the<br />
matter on 25 March 1997 and the Internal <strong>Audit</strong> draft report was<br />
issued on 8 May 1997. <strong>The</strong> recommendations of the internal audit<br />
have either been completed or are nearing completion. While<br />
some computer modifications have been made, further<br />
enhancements now also form part of a wider AFP computer<br />
development program.<br />
ANAO sample testing of transactions<br />
3 96 As with the AFP internal audit work, the ANAO’s testing of a<br />
sample of firearms surrender transactions identified some<br />
procedural inaccuracies. <strong>The</strong> ANAO reviewed all records of<br />
transfer of firearms for disposal which existed at the time of audit.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se amounted to about 3350 surrendered weapons. About 2<br />
per cent of these (76 records) did not show clear evidence of the<br />
transfer to Firearms and Ballistics Branch (F and B Branch) for<br />
disposal.<br />
3 97 Some entries on destruction schedules were annotated by<br />
F and B Branch as ‘not received’, while others were simply crossed<br />
out without explanatory annotation. Reference to the relevant<br />
computer record did not provide information as to its location.<br />
3 98 In all cases the ANAO subsequently found adequate evidence of<br />
despatch for destruction on other destruction schedules or of<br />
retention in the F&B ballistic library, or physically located the<br />
weapon where it had been retained within the Weapons Registry.<br />
3 99 Retention had been justified either:<br />
• pending valuation or dispute of valuation; or<br />
• for AFP training or display purposes.<br />
3 100 <strong>The</strong> ANAO found that some weapons had been deleted from<br />
destruction schedules because the relevant weapon was not<br />
physically present in a batch of weapons. This had occurred<br />
because:<br />
64 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Gun</strong> <strong>Buy</strong>-<strong>Back</strong> <strong>Scheme</strong>