22.03.2013 Views

Fate and Transport of Zoonotic Bacterial, Viral, and - The Pork Store ...

Fate and Transport of Zoonotic Bacterial, Viral, and - The Pork Store ...

Fate and Transport of Zoonotic Bacterial, Viral, and - The Pork Store ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14<br />

<strong>Fate</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Transport</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Zoonotic</strong> <strong>Bacterial</strong>, <strong>Viral</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Parasitic Pathogens during Swine Manure Treatment, Storage, <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Application<br />

pathogens on plant surfaces is limited; recent outbreaks<br />

<strong>of</strong> enteric disease related to consumption <strong>of</strong> produce,<br />

however, have increased research on this topic. <strong>The</strong><br />

survival <strong>of</strong> swine manure zoonotic pathogens on plant<br />

surfaces is <strong>of</strong> interest. Hutchison <strong>and</strong> colleagues (2005b)<br />

found that when experimentally inoculated pig manure<br />

slurry was applied to fescue grass pasture, Lysteria<br />

monocytogenes was detected for 63 d, E. coli O157 for 32<br />

d, <strong>and</strong> Salmonella strains <strong>and</strong> Campylobacter jejuni were<br />

detected for 16 d. When farmyard manure from pigs<br />

was applied to the same grass pasture, L. monocytogenes<br />

<strong>and</strong> E. coli O157 survivals were the same, but the<br />

Salmonella strains <strong>and</strong> C. jejuni survival increased to<br />

32 d (Hutchison et al. 2005b). Using Listeria innocua<br />

<strong>and</strong> Clostridium sporogens as surrogates <strong>of</strong> pathogenic<br />

bacteria, Girardin <strong>and</strong> colleagues (2005) found that<br />

C. sporogens spores survived very well in the soil with<br />

under a 10 CFU/g <strong>of</strong> soil decrease after 100 d <strong>and</strong> were<br />

detected on parsley grown in that soil at between<br />

100 <strong>and</strong> 1000 CFU/g throughout cultivation. On<br />

the other h<strong>and</strong>, L. innocua decreased from 4.0 × 10 5<br />

to 32 d for Listeria, <strong>and</strong> 4<br />

<strong>and</strong> 16 d for Campylobacter, in s<strong>and</strong>y arable soil <strong>and</strong><br />

clay loam grassl<strong>and</strong> soil, respectively. <strong>The</strong>se pathogens<br />

tended to survive longer in the clay loam soil than in<br />

the s<strong>and</strong>y arable soil. Monitoring Enterobacteriaceae<br />

in clay loam soil with swine manure applied over a<br />

3-yr period, de Freitas <strong>and</strong> colleagues (2003) found that<br />

Enterobacteriaceae concentrations tended to increase<br />

with increasing rates <strong>of</strong> manure application. Average<br />

Enterobacteriaceae concentrations were different<br />

across the 3 yr (0.4 × 10 3 CFU/g soil in Year 1, 5.4 × 10 3<br />

CFU/g soil in Year 2, <strong>and</strong> 0.7 × 10 3 CFU/g soil in Year 3,<br />

averaging counts from 150 <strong>and</strong> 300 kg nitrogen/hectare<br />

application rate plots).<br />

Incorporation <strong>and</strong> timing <strong>of</strong> incorporation <strong>of</strong><br />

swine manure into arable s<strong>and</strong>y loam soil in spring<br />

or winter altered the survival rate <strong>of</strong> enteric bacterial<br />

pathogens (Hutchison et al. 2004). Immediate<br />

incorporation with spring application <strong>of</strong> liquid swine<br />

manure increased the time for a log reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

Salmonella sp. (2.44 versus 1.89 <strong>and</strong> 0.79 d), E. coli O157<br />

(4.89 versus 0.97 <strong>and</strong> 1.76 d), Listeria sp. (1.13 versus 0.66<br />

<strong>and</strong> 0.84 d), <strong>and</strong> Campylobacter sp.(1.03 versus 0.63 <strong>and</strong><br />

2.26 d for immediate versus delayed <strong>and</strong> unincorporated<br />

manure). <strong>The</strong> reduction times were slightly different<br />

with winter application: Salmonella sp. (5.20 versus<br />

2.00 d), E. coli O157 (1.86 versus 1.54 d), Listeria sp.<br />

(1.71 versus 1.21 d), <strong>and</strong> Campylobacter sp. (1.14 versus<br />

0.92 d for immediate versus unincorporated manure).<br />

Results were similar for farmyard manure (feces <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!