23.03.2013 Views

Breagh Development - RWE.com

Breagh Development - RWE.com

Breagh Development - RWE.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Breagh</strong> Environmental Statement<br />

Section 1 - Introduction<br />

Marine<br />

Management<br />

Organisation<br />

(Formerly the<br />

Marine Fisheries<br />

Agency)<br />

March 2010<br />

North Eastern<br />

Sea Fisheries<br />

Committee<br />

March 2010<br />

JNCC<br />

January 2009<br />

CEFAS January<br />

2009<br />

1-8<br />

construction will be necessary. Agreed to use<br />

guard vessels to patrol the working corridor and<br />

ensure smaller fishing vessels deploying static gear<br />

observe the designated work corridor. NFFO<br />

preference is for trenched and buried pipelines.<br />

Q3/Q4 2010 RDUK and NFFO shall start working on<br />

a collaboration/co-operation plan for liaison with<br />

local fisherman during pipeline construction<br />

activities in 2011.<br />

RDUK contacted three groups within the MMO<br />

• North Shields District Inspector;<br />

• Grimsby District Inspector;<br />

• Marine Consents (North Shields).<br />

RDUK sent a short project briefing and a summary<br />

of the meeting with NFFO for review and <strong>com</strong>ment<br />

to the MMO. Response was as follows:<br />

The MMO agreed with the actions identified during<br />

the NFFO consultation. The MMO expressed a<br />

desire for smaller fishing businesses which may not<br />

be members of the NFFO to be included in the<br />

consultation/collaboration plan.<br />

The NESFC requested that:<br />

• Near shore fishing activities were<br />

accurately identified;<br />

• Consult DECC and DEFRA data regarding<br />

near shore fishing activities;<br />

• Consider undertaking beam trawls as part<br />

of the near shore survey.<br />

Baseline survey to be undertaken and any potential<br />

impacts addressed.<br />

CEFAS did not <strong>com</strong>ment on the proposed<br />

development but requested that a copy of the ES<br />

be distributed to the OCNS team.<br />

3, 5<br />

3, 5<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!