Staff motivation - Vision Realization
Staff motivation - Vision Realization
Staff motivation - Vision Realization
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Trust Element Examples<br />
Credibility Supervisors make realistic promises and deliver on them<br />
I can believe what my managers tell me<br />
My managers walk their talk<br />
Supervisors know what they are talking about; they’re competent<br />
Money is used wisely here to meet the mission<br />
Open<br />
communication<br />
The best “role models” we have in this camp really seek out criticism of their own work<br />
Supervisors are approachable and easy to talk with<br />
In teams, we often have good conflicts where people speak their mind freely without<br />
fear of personal, emotional (guilt, shame, disgust, anger), or job retribution<br />
<strong>Staff</strong> feel that they can be open and honest. They know it is safe (job security, physical,<br />
monetary, emotional – guilt, shame, disgust, anger) and that management’s ear is really<br />
listening.<br />
Anything negative you say around here is likely to have consequences later on (reverse<br />
scored)<br />
When people voice disagreements appropriately, both parties come away feeling heard<br />
and safe<br />
People here often go along with decisions they don’t really agree with (reverse scored)<br />
There are no formal or informal consequences for speaking your mind appropriately,<br />
even if it is something we strongly disagree with<br />
In teams, people sometimes disagree on issues, but they’ll bite their tongue (reverse<br />
scored)<br />
Managers convey their thoughts and feelings, while showing support and understanding<br />
Respect People are encouraged to balance their work and personal life (within reasonable and<br />
expected camp norms)<br />
Management respects me as an individual, and not just as a cog in the machine<br />
Supervisors partner with me to ensure my career success and good performance<br />
Management respects my ideas, and collaborates with me on decisions<br />
Supervisors are a beacon of integrity<br />
Fairness People here are paid fairly for the work they do (within reasonable and expected camp<br />
norms)<br />
Promotions go to those who best deserve them<br />
It is fair to say that the playing field here is level<br />
Politics play a small role in this camp<br />
I've seen weak performers in this camp still do well in their performance reviews<br />
(reverse scored)<br />
Supervisors in this camp receive honest feedback about their people-management<br />
performance<br />
Performance evaluations are always done in both directions (you evaluate your<br />
supervisors)<br />
Subordinates’ evaluations of their superiors are seen by their manager’s superiors, and it<br />
is safe for the subordinates to be honest<br />
There is an effective and safe (personal; emotional – guilt, shame, disgust, anger;<br />
physical; or job retribution) means of appeals when problems arise<br />
There is a system in place for anonymous evaluations/feedback<br />
Open forums, where true dialogue occurs, happen when needed<br />
There are no unusual and uncalled for perks and privileges<br />
Problems are viewed holistically – person, situation, other people, and the long causal<br />
chain.<br />
Management recognizes that honest mistakes are part of doing business<br />
If you use this as a survey, mix up the items so that, for example, all the fairness questions aren’t together. When I<br />
say “reverse scored,” it means that if someone answered with a 4, you’d mark it as a 2, because they are agreeing<br />
with a negative statement. Also, it is important to look at what each anonymous respondent answered, and not just<br />
the averages for items, subscales, and overall.<br />
© 2004 Randall Grayson, Ph.D. 16