26.03.2013 Views

Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap FY2011-2036 - Defense ...

Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap FY2011-2036 - Defense ...

Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap FY2011-2036 - Defense ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Unmanned</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Roadmap</strong> <strong>FY2011</strong>-<strong>2036</strong><br />

of micro-UAS operating semi-autonomously) into military operations with other manned and<br />

unmanned systems.<br />

“Everyone, regardless of the platform, receives the same information at the<br />

same time, leading to true interoperability; this is the Army’s key goal.<br />

Other MUM missions have different challenges including cargo, air refueling, interdiction in<br />

contested areas, electronic/network attack (EA), suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD), and<br />

other traditional air combat missions. The ability to communicate from a highly maneuverable<br />

aircraft to a highly maneuverable future UAS will require significant advances in autonomy and<br />

HSI. This advancement can be compounded if LPI communication is needed for missions such<br />

as EA, SEAD, or control of long-dwell insect-size vehicles collecting information inside<br />

buildings.<br />

10.4 Way Ahead (2011–<strong>2036</strong>)<br />

- Lt. Col. Adam Hinsdale,<br />

Chief, UAS Division,<br />

Department of the Army Aviation Directorate<br />

Some key events will affect the future of MUM teaming over the next 25 years. As<br />

improvements in communications and sensor technologies evolve, new tactics will surely follow.<br />

For instance, it should be expected that there will be a shift away from the current reliance on<br />

video with operators incorporating other sensors (such as audio or tactile) to augment the tactical<br />

picture. Also, as commanders continue to integrate multiple manned and unmanned systems into<br />

their operations, they will soon be able to implement a “field of view” approach, similar to the<br />

“God’s eye” perspective seen in many current video games. A commander will be able to view a<br />

target from multiple perspectives (i.e., UGV, UAS, or manned sensors), using multiple sensors,<br />

to obtain more robust and comprehensive situational awareness. As MUM advances, new HSI<br />

and autonomy will change the role of people in mission execution and dramatically increase their<br />

effectiveness.<br />

The most significant advances in MUM operations will begin as Services migrate away from<br />

the current closed-loop scenario between sensor and shooter to networked systems. High<br />

endurance UAS already have mission teams geographically separated from the platform and<br />

from each other. Wide-area sensors are also changing the paradigm on STANAG 4586 LOIs and<br />

USIP development. Employing MUM segments as nodes on a larger network will change how<br />

missions are executed and will dramatically affect the combat effectiveness.<br />

Investments in technologies such as automated air refueling, tactical data link control of<br />

maneuverable aircraft, and autonomy in the near term will enable “loyal wingman” operations.<br />

The effectiveness of air missions will not be achieved by a collection of assets, but collaboration<br />

between manned and unmanned systems within the context of a network. These nodes on the<br />

network will have scalable transparent control, not the brittle closed-loop control and inflexible<br />

autonomy algorithms used today.<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!