26.03.2013 Views

Australian Women's Book Review Volume 14.1 - School of English ...

Australian Women's Book Review Volume 14.1 - School of English ...

Australian Women's Book Review Volume 14.1 - School of English ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ambiguity Stripped Bare<br />

Helen McDonald, Erotic Ambiguities: The Female Nude in Art.<br />

London and New York: Routledge, 2001.<br />

<strong>Review</strong>ed by Morgan Thomas.<br />

How does contemporary feminist thought approach the erotic potential <strong>of</strong> visual representations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

female body? In what ways would a feminist politics, or a feminist ethics, now make sense <strong>of</strong> this<br />

erotic potential - and <strong>of</strong> the never-ending fascination with the female body in contemporary art and<br />

culture? To what extent have new political concerns and stakes altered feminist perspectives on visual<br />

representation in recent years? These are only a few <strong>of</strong> the important questions at the heart <strong>of</strong> Helen<br />

McDonald's Erotic Ambiguities: The Female Nude in Art.<br />

McDonald retraces the changing fortunes and stakes <strong>of</strong> feminist approaches to the female body in<br />

critical theory and art practice over the past three decades. Her primary interest here is with the ways in<br />

which a diversity <strong>of</strong> art practices - whether overtly feminist or informed by feminist thinking - have set<br />

out to challenge pervasive, yet inherently unattainable ideals <strong>of</strong> female bodily perfection. In<br />

McDonald's account, the disparate art practices arising out <strong>of</strong> the women's movement have been<br />

effective in resisting the powerful hold <strong>of</strong> such ideals. She argues that by developing a positive, yet<br />

'conceptual' rather than 'representational' ideal based on a principle <strong>of</strong> inclusiveness and difference,<br />

contemporary art has worked to displace these ideals - it has really 'made a difference.'<br />

In making her case, McDonald foregrounds the necessary<br />

ambiguity (uncertainty, blurring, complexity) <strong>of</strong> art and visual<br />

representation in general. She suggests that it is specifically<br />

through their 'negotiation' <strong>of</strong> this ambiguity that art practices in<br />

the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s have been productive in generating<br />

a 'feminised' ideal <strong>of</strong> the female body. The recurring tension in<br />

McDonald's book issues from the connection she draws<br />

between ambiguity and the possibility <strong>of</strong> a feminised ideal at<br />

work in recent art practices. Yet it seemed to me that certain<br />

difficulties arise from the pivotal role McDonald assigns to<br />

ambiguity in this book. Ambiguity is taken to be at once the<br />

constant condition <strong>of</strong> art, and that which effectively displaces<br />

Classical ideals <strong>of</strong> the female body in certain forms <strong>of</strong><br />

contemporary art. If, as McDonald contends, art is 'always<br />

ambiguous', how does ambiguity distinguish certain art<br />

practices from others? McDonald certainly makes<br />

interpretative decisions on this point - there is 'negative'<br />

ambiguity and there is 'productive' ambiguity - but she tends to<br />

elide the key issue <strong>of</strong> how she arrives at these determinations.<br />

This approach also leaves aside the question <strong>of</strong> whether<br />

ambiguity is always the most significant element <strong>of</strong> the works<br />

being analysed. To take one example discussed by McDonald, in an installation by Melbourne artist<br />

Kate Beynon we see a pair <strong>of</strong> tiny, beautiful Chinese slippers next to stuffed calico forms designed to<br />

evoke the damaged shape <strong>of</strong> mutilated feet once they are 'unbound'. This does not strike me as<br />

particularly ambiguous. It is rather the starkness and vividness <strong>of</strong> the juxtaposition that makes this work<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!