29.03.2013 Views

Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Appendices - USGS

Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Appendices - USGS

Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Appendices - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>USGS</strong>-NPS <strong>Vegetation</strong> <strong>Mapping</strong> Program<br />

Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park<br />

Variables selected for the environmental stratification were elevation, aspect, soils, <strong>and</strong> disturbance (as<br />

captured in fire history; see the three tables below—Stratification Variables <strong>and</strong> Classes—for classes<br />

delineated for each variable). Elevation <strong>and</strong> aspect are derived from DEMs. National Park Service staff<br />

provided coverage of soil classes <strong>and</strong> fire history of GNP. These datasets were transformed into grids<br />

with the same cell size <strong>and</strong> reference as the DEM. All coverages <strong>and</strong> grids were in the Universal<br />

Transverse Mercator (UTM) zones 11 <strong>and</strong> 12 projection, North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83). For<br />

the gradsect analysis, all grid data were projected in UTM zone 12, again using NAD 83.<br />

For each variable, the grid cells were reclassified into the classes established by the working group. The<br />

grids were then intersected to find the unique spatial combinations of variables that constituted polygons,<br />

termed Biophysical Units (BPUs), which became the units of l<strong>and</strong>scape (environmental) stratification. An<br />

example of a BPU, which could have many polygons, would be “Deep soils of argillite or quartzite,<br />

between 1351–1700 m in elevation, with pre-1840 fire, on north aspects.”<br />

In the year 2000, the environmental stratification was modified to (1) smooth the 30-meter DEM to<br />

remove noise, (2) reduce the artificial proliferation of BPUs by renumbering the classes (data layers <strong>and</strong><br />

classes unchanged), <strong>and</strong> (3) combine polygons (BPUs) less than 0.18 ha with their nearest neighbors. To<br />

ensure that the full environmental gradient east of the CD was sampled, it was divided into the Hudson<br />

Bay <strong>and</strong> the Missouri River (northern-portion <strong>and</strong> southern-portion) watersheds. Each BPU east of the<br />

CD was then attributed by drainage. This coverage was joined spatially to the plots already collected, <strong>and</strong><br />

the resulting BPUs previously sampled were removed from consideration for the 2000 field sampling.<br />

BPUs occurring in only one drainage were deleted from consideration. Remaining in the sampling pool<br />

were those BPUs completely unsampled or sampled only in one portion of range of occurrence. West of<br />

the CD was not comparably stratified to accommodate north-south variation.<br />

The year 2000 analysis resulted in 17,808 polygons attributed to 377 BPUs across GNP east <strong>and</strong> west of<br />

the CD. To winnow this number of BPUs to one capable of being efficiently accessed <strong>and</strong> sampled, the<br />

coverage of BPUs was joined to an accumulated cost surface of GNP. Sites were selected to complete the<br />

full sampling of each BPU based on size <strong>and</strong> travel cost (selecting BPUs in physical proximity of one<br />

another). Several BPU types were deleted as targets because no examples of sufficient size occurred (all<br />

polygons of 0.18 ha in size or smaller were dissolved into the adjacent polygons), or because the only<br />

available polygons would have been hazardous for the field crews to sample. If possible, at least three<br />

polygons of each BPU were selected for sampling. These were distributed throughout the range of the<br />

BPU, thus replicating examples of each BPU type. Polygons covering hazardous area were masked from<br />

selection for sampling; for example, polygons where the average slope was 50o or steeper were not<br />

selected. The average polygon size was 7.45 ha <strong>and</strong> on average required approximately 800 m (about 0.5<br />

mi.) of hiking on moderate terrain to access.<br />

Appendix D: Gradsect Sampling Design Methodology D-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!