29.03.2013 Views

724_Final Report.pdf - North Pacific Research Board

724_Final Report.pdf - North Pacific Research Board

724_Final Report.pdf - North Pacific Research Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DFA and showed that there were changes in FA signatures among biopsies and therefore that they<br />

reflected changes in diet, which was confirmed later in the QFASA model.<br />

Model estimates were strongly influenced by the FA subset and CC set. The Reduced A and B<br />

FA subsets were modified from the published Dietary FA subset and provided the best overall diet<br />

estimates for spectacled and Steller’s eiders, respectively. The Extended Dietary subset and subsets<br />

modified from it provided poorer diet estimates. FAs were omitted from the published subsets in order of<br />

highest variability observed in CCs, which tended to provide better diet estimates. In contrast, Iverson et<br />

al. (2007) removed FAs with large CCs, which produced poorer estimates in the model. However, diets,<br />

CCs and bird species differed between studies and likely influenced model results. The Extended Dietary<br />

subset includes all FAs in the Dietary subset and eight FAs that could be biosynthesized by consumers,<br />

but whose levels in a consumer are also influenced by consumption of specific diet items. This may have<br />

influenced the diet estimates because eiders were on a diet heavily influenced by carbohydrates from the<br />

corn-based Mazuri (approximately 50% carbohydrate), which could have led to more biosynthesis of<br />

these FAs than with diets contributing less carbohydrate. Although 27 subsets were evaluated, the<br />

possibility remains for different combinations of FA to provide more accurate diet estimates and requires<br />

further investigation.<br />

Spectacled and Steller’s eider CCs were very similar to each other and generally shared similar<br />

patterns to those of the common murre chicks CCs from Iverson et al. (2007). However, there were some<br />

notable differences, which may be attributed to the differences in diet: common murres in Iverson et al.<br />

(2007) were fed a piscivorous diet (100% Atlantic silverside) while eiders in this study were fed a more<br />

terrestrial and high-carbohydrate diet (corn-based Mazuri) which could lead to more biosynthesis of FAs<br />

in the eiders. Interestingly, the model provided similar diet estimates when using the Reduced A, B, and<br />

Dietary subsets and eider CCs as estimates from using the Extended Dietary subset and common murre<br />

CCs. We speculate that this may indicate that the Dietary subset and subsets modified from it are more<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!