Argenna prominula TULLGREN, 1948 (Figs 1, 2) Material: 3 ♂♂ (IGEB): Buryatia, Kurumkansky Distr., Balan-Tamur Lake, larch <strong>for</strong>est, 1200 m, 16 July 1995, S. Danilov; 18 ♂♂ (IGEB): Chita Area, Kyrinsky Distr., Sokhoninsky Reserve, Verkhny Bukukun locality, larch <strong>for</strong>est, 1600 m, 21 July 1990, S. Danilov. Distribution: Holarctic range. Dictyna alaskae CHAMBERLIN ET IVIE, 1947 (Figs 3, 4) Material: 1 ♂ (IGEB): Irkutsk Area, Slyudyansky Distr., Baikalsk, birch <strong>for</strong>est, 14 July 1983, S. Didorenko. Distribution: Holarctic range. In South Siberia, <strong>the</strong> species has been known in Tuva only (LOGUNOV et al., 1998). Dictyna dahurica sp.nov. (Figs 5, 6) Type locality: Russia, Chita Area, Duldurginsky Distr., Toktchin Vill., steppe. Type material: Holotype. 1 ♀ (ZMMU): Chita Area, Duldurginsky Distr., Toktchin Vill., steppe, 16 July 1997, Ts. Damdinova. Description: Female. Carapace 1.1 long, 0.8 wide, light brown. Abdomen 2.2 long, 1.5 wide, with typical pattern <strong>for</strong> ‘major’ group. Legs light brown. Epigyne as in Figs 5 and 6. Male unknown. Distribution: Chita Area (Russia). Etymology: The species is named after <strong>the</strong> traditional name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Chita Area «Dahuria». Diagnosis: D. dahurica sp. nov. differs from <strong>the</strong> all known Palearctic Dictyna species by <strong>the</strong> internal structure <strong>of</strong> its epigyne (Fig. 6), it has narrow receptacula without any widening. Dictyna dunini sp.nov. (Figs 7, 8) Type locality: Russia, Buryatia, environs <strong>of</strong> Ulan-Ude, grassland. Type material: Holotype. 1 ♀ (ZMMU): Buryatia, environs <strong>of</strong> Ulan-Ude, grassland, 12 June 1996, S. Rudykh. Paratypes. 1 ♀ (IGEB), Irkutsk Area, Slyudyansky Distr., Baikalsk, birch <strong>for</strong>est, 14 June 1983, S. Didorenko; 1 ♀+ (ZMMU), Buryatia, environs <strong>of</strong> Ulan-Ude, mixed <strong>for</strong>est, 11 October 1995, S. Rudykh; 1 ♀ (IGEB), Buryatia, Kurumkansky Distr., Dzherginsky Reserve, Dzhirga locality, mixed <strong>for</strong>est, 17 June 1995, S. Danilov. Description: Female. Carapace 0.85-1.05 long, 0.7-0.8 wide. Abdomen 1.4-1.75 long, 0.9-1.2 wide. Abdomen light grey, anterior part <strong>of</strong> half <strong>of</strong> abdomen with an oblong dark stripe. Epigyne as in Figs 7-8. Distribution: Irkutsk Area, Buryatia (Russia). Etymology: The new species is named after <strong>the</strong> Russian arachnologist Pyotr Dunin. Diagnosis: The species is close, judging by <strong>the</strong> internal structure <strong>of</strong> its epigyne, to D. uvs MARUSIK ET KOPONEN, 1998, but differs by <strong>the</strong> shape and sclerotisation <strong>of</strong> its epigyne openings. 38
Figs 1-7. 1-2 Argenna prominula TULLGREN: (1) male palp, ventral view, (2) tibia <strong>of</strong> male palp, dorsal view; 3-4 Dictyna alaskae CHAMBERLIN ET IVIE: male palp, ventral (3) and lateral (4) view; 5-6 Dictyna dahurica sp.nov.: epigyne, ventral (5) and dorsal (6) view; 7 Dictyna dunini sp.nov.: epigyne, ventral view. Scale lines=0.1 mm. 39
- Page 1 and 2: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 3 and 4: negatively to spider fitness in a m
- Page 5 and 6: Cumulated number of eggsacs per fem
- Page 7 and 8: from females reared on Normal flies
- Page 9 and 10: on offspring size was not measured
- Page 11 and 12: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 13 and 14: Dysdera gamarrae FERRÁNDEZ, 1984 D
- Page 15 and 16: Araneus grossus (C. L. KOCH, 1844)
- Page 17 and 18: Zodarion viduum DENIS, 1937 PRODIDO
- Page 19 and 20: Synageles venator (LUCAS, 1836) Tal
- Page 21: BLAUWE, R., 1980: Revision de la fa
- Page 24 and 25: made on the specimen of October 19
- Page 26 and 27: 34 Fig. 4. Distribution map of Neme
- Page 28 and 29: Acknowledgements I would like to th
- Page 32 and 33: Figs 8-16. 8 Dictyna dunini sp.nov.
- Page 34 and 35: Dictyna paramajor sp.nov. (Figs 9-1
- Page 36 and 37: References DANILOV, S.N., 1994: Cri
- Page 38 and 39: Introduction Flemish forests have b
- Page 40 and 41: T a b l e 1. List of sampled forest
- Page 42 and 43: T a b l e 2. (cont.) 50 Species No.
- Page 44 and 45: T a b l e 3. Values of the physico-
- Page 46 and 47: impression that, according to the f
- Page 48 and 49: These results were compared with or
- Page 50 and 51: MAELFAIT, J.-P., BAERT, L., JANSSEN
- Page 52 and 53: Fig. 1. Geographic division of the
- Page 54 and 55: Number of species 62 140 120 100 80
- Page 56 and 57: the mountains compared with the low
- Page 59 and 60: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 61 and 62: is beyond the scope of this paper.
- Page 63 and 64: T a b l e 1. Synapomorphies of Hapl
- Page 65 and 66: a problem with using this term sinc
- Page 67 and 68: part in Solifugae and Pseudoscorpio
- Page 69 and 70: Acknowledgements I thank Bill Shear
- Page 71 and 72: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 73 and 74: Figs 1-11. Eusimonia divina, male [
- Page 75 and 76: Figs 13-19. Eusimonia turkestana, m
- Page 77 and 78: Eusimonia birulai (ROEWER) BIRULA,
- Page 79 and 80: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 81 and 82:
al., 1996). Especially in these fra
- Page 83 and 84:
The interpretation of the banding p
- Page 85 and 86:
Two different measures were used to
- Page 87 and 88:
DE WOLF, H., BACKELJAU, T., VERHAGE
- Page 89 and 90:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 91 and 92:
cally-controlled design patterns an
- Page 93 and 94:
presence of previously-spun lines (
- Page 95 and 96:
a web, and tested the effects of th
- Page 97 and 98:
HIGGINS, L., 1995: Direct evidence
- Page 99 and 100:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 101 and 102:
T a b l e 1. Characterisation of th
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 2. (cont.) Species Red Data L
- Page 105 and 106:
A 0/Z 0 30/Z 30 50/Z 50 100/ Z 100
- Page 107 and 108:
Discussion With a total of 97 speci
- Page 109 and 110:
OTTO, H.-J., 1994: Waldökologie. U
- Page 111 and 112:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 113 and 114:
Fig. 1. Comparison of most abundant
- Page 115 and 116:
Discussion A spider community is a
- Page 117 and 118:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 119 and 120:
Fig. 1. Map of Central Europe with
- Page 121 and 122:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 123 and 124:
T a b l e 1. Main staining affiniti
- Page 125 and 126:
Fig. 2. Oblique section of the ante
- Page 127 and 128:
2 ). The basic histological structu
- Page 129 and 130:
Excretory duct Lycosa tarentula. Th
- Page 131 and 132:
ARVY, L., 1966: Données histochimi
- Page 133 and 134:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 135 and 136:
Electron Microscopy for two species
- Page 137 and 138:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 139 and 140:
Figs 1-4. Brazilobothriurus pantana
- Page 141 and 142:
Fig. 15. Map showing the location o
- Page 143 and 144:
Variability of characters in paraty
- Page 145 and 146:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 147 and 148:
ottle. Higher quality flies (called
- Page 149 and 150:
Fig. 1. Specific consumption [mg pr