- Page 1 and 2: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 3 and 4: negatively to spider fitness in a m
- Page 5 and 6: Cumulated number of eggsacs per fem
- Page 7 and 8: from females reared on Normal flies
- Page 9 and 10: on offspring size was not measured
- Page 11 and 12: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 13 and 14: Dysdera gamarrae FERRÁNDEZ, 1984 D
- Page 15 and 16: Araneus grossus (C. L. KOCH, 1844)
- Page 17 and 18: Zodarion viduum DENIS, 1937 PRODIDO
- Page 19 and 20: Synageles venator (LUCAS, 1836) Tal
- Page 21: BLAUWE, R., 1980: Revision de la fa
- Page 24 and 25: made on the specimen of October 19
- Page 26 and 27: 34 Fig. 4. Distribution map of Neme
- Page 28 and 29: Acknowledgements I would like to th
- Page 30 and 31: Argenna prominula TULLGREN, 1948 (F
- Page 34 and 35: Dictyna paramajor sp.nov. (Figs 9-1
- Page 36 and 37: References DANILOV, S.N., 1994: Cri
- Page 38 and 39: Introduction Flemish forests have b
- Page 40 and 41: T a b l e 1. List of sampled forest
- Page 42 and 43: T a b l e 2. (cont.) 50 Species No.
- Page 44 and 45: T a b l e 3. Values of the physico-
- Page 46 and 47: impression that, according to the f
- Page 48 and 49: These results were compared with or
- Page 50 and 51: MAELFAIT, J.-P., BAERT, L., JANSSEN
- Page 52 and 53: Fig. 1. Geographic division of the
- Page 54 and 55: Number of species 62 140 120 100 80
- Page 56 and 57: the mountains compared with the low
- Page 59 and 60: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 61 and 62: is beyond the scope of this paper.
- Page 63 and 64: T a b l e 1. Synapomorphies of Hapl
- Page 65 and 66: a problem with using this term sinc
- Page 67 and 68: part in Solifugae and Pseudoscorpio
- Page 69 and 70: Acknowledgements I thank Bill Shear
- Page 71 and 72: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 73 and 74: Figs 1-11. Eusimonia divina, male [
- Page 75 and 76: Figs 13-19. Eusimonia turkestana, m
- Page 77 and 78: Eusimonia birulai (ROEWER) BIRULA,
- Page 79 and 80: Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 81 and 82: al., 1996). Especially in these fra
- Page 83 and 84:
The interpretation of the banding p
- Page 85 and 86:
Two different measures were used to
- Page 87 and 88:
DE WOLF, H., BACKELJAU, T., VERHAGE
- Page 89 and 90:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 91 and 92:
cally-controlled design patterns an
- Page 93 and 94:
presence of previously-spun lines (
- Page 95 and 96:
a web, and tested the effects of th
- Page 97 and 98:
HIGGINS, L., 1995: Direct evidence
- Page 99 and 100:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 101 and 102:
T a b l e 1. Characterisation of th
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 2. (cont.) Species Red Data L
- Page 105 and 106:
A 0/Z 0 30/Z 30 50/Z 50 100/ Z 100
- Page 107 and 108:
Discussion With a total of 97 speci
- Page 109 and 110:
OTTO, H.-J., 1994: Waldökologie. U
- Page 111 and 112:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 113 and 114:
Fig. 1. Comparison of most abundant
- Page 115 and 116:
Discussion A spider community is a
- Page 117 and 118:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 119 and 120:
Fig. 1. Map of Central Europe with
- Page 121 and 122:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 123 and 124:
T a b l e 1. Main staining affiniti
- Page 125 and 126:
Fig. 2. Oblique section of the ante
- Page 127 and 128:
2 ). The basic histological structu
- Page 129 and 130:
Excretory duct Lycosa tarentula. Th
- Page 131 and 132:
ARVY, L., 1966: Données histochimi
- Page 133 and 134:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 135 and 136:
Electron Microscopy for two species
- Page 137 and 138:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 139 and 140:
Figs 1-4. Brazilobothriurus pantana
- Page 141 and 142:
Fig. 15. Map showing the location o
- Page 143 and 144:
Variability of characters in paraty
- Page 145 and 146:
Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 19, Sup
- Page 147 and 148:
ottle. Higher quality flies (called
- Page 149 and 150:
Fig. 1. Specific consumption [mg pr