29.03.2013 Views

Aliens Newsletter - ISSG

Aliens Newsletter - ISSG

Aliens Newsletter - ISSG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

1984<br />

1985<br />

The arrival of Ruddy Ducks in Europe<br />

As the UK population grew and its breeding range<br />

spread, increasing numbers of Ruddy Ducks began<br />

to appear in Europe, most notably in the countries<br />

adjoining the UK such as France, Belgium and the<br />

Netherlands. DNA analysis has confirmed that the<br />

European Ruddy Duck population is likely to derive<br />

solely from the captive population in the UK<br />

(Muñoz-Fuentes et al. 2006). Captive birds are also<br />

present in some European countries, but the close<br />

correlation between the rise in the UK population<br />

and the increase in records in mainland Europe suggests<br />

that escapes from captivity are not the main<br />

source of birds in Europe. In addition, the appearance<br />

of winter flocks of 30–40 birds in France (winter<br />

1995/96) and Spain (January 1997, following<br />

freezing conditions across northern Europe) cannot<br />

be explained by escapes from captivity (Hughes<br />

1996). By 1999 the breeding range of Ruddy Ducks<br />

in the UK included most suitable habitat in England<br />

and Wales as well as several areas of Scotland and<br />

parts of Ireland. By January 2000, the UK population<br />

was estimated at c. 6,000 birds (Kershaw &<br />

Hughes 2002). Annual breeding attempts were also<br />

believed to occur in at least six countries in the<br />

Western Palearctic, in addition to the UK: France,<br />

the Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Iceland and Morocco<br />

(Hughes 1999).<br />

The background to the eradication programme<br />

in the UK<br />

By the early 1990s, when the UK held around 95%<br />

of all the Ruddy Ducks in Europe, it had become<br />

1986<br />

1987<br />

1988<br />

1989<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

Figure 4. Numbers of Ruddy Ducks recorded in Spain, 1984-2009<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

clear that to do nothing would eventually allow Ruddy<br />

Ducks to spread through the continent. The Spanish<br />

authorities would then find it increasingly difficult<br />

to prevent the establishment of Ruddy Ducks<br />

with the attendant risk of increasing levels of hybridisation<br />

between Ruddy Ducks and White-headed<br />

Ducks. Given that White-headed Ducks in Spain<br />

are now protected from hunting and habitat loss, it<br />

is generally recognised that introgressive hybridisation<br />

with the Ruddy Duck is now the greatest longterm<br />

threat to the White-headed Duck (e.g. Hughes<br />

et al. 2006).<br />

The case of the Ruddy Duck is unique in that action<br />

has been taken in one country to protect a<br />

species in another. Ruddy Ducks were regarded by<br />

many as an attractive and harmless addition to the<br />

British avifauna, and to a lesser degree this remains<br />

the case. Many in the UK took the view that if the<br />

Ruddy Duck was a problem it should be dealt with<br />

in Spain. It was also highly uncertain whether control<br />

of Ruddy Ducks in the UK was feasible (particularly<br />

to the point of eradication), how much eradication<br />

might cost, and whether it would be acceptable<br />

to the general public. For these reasons the UK<br />

Government commissioned small-scale research into<br />

control in the early 1990s. This involved the<br />

culling of fewer than 100 birds per year and had no<br />

significant effect on the population, but the results<br />

indicated that breeding-season shooting was the<br />

most effective method of control, followed by winter<br />

shooting. Although nest trapping had a high intrinsic<br />

efficiency, the rate of control in terms of staff<br />

effort was very low and the method would therefore<br />

be an ineffective means of attempting eradication.<br />

The report concluded that eradication was feasible<br />

<strong>Aliens</strong> 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!