02.04.2013 Views

“The End of Art” - ETD - University of Notre Dame

“The End of Art” - ETD - University of Notre Dame

“The End of Art” - ETD - University of Notre Dame

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

followed the poetic forms <strong>of</strong> T.S. Eliot and W. H. Auden even well-after WWII, “the careers<br />

<strong>of</strong> the inheritors were too <strong>of</strong>ten ‘literary,’ resting the idea <strong>of</strong> literature itself on a fixed notion<br />

<strong>of</strong> poetry & poem, which might be improved upon but never questioned at the root.” 22<br />

Similarly, inheritance betokens an obstacle to formal innovation when Olson calls for<br />

“COMPOSITION BY FIELD, as opposed to inherited line, stanza, over-all form, what is<br />

the ‘old’ base <strong>of</strong> the non-projective” (SW, 16).<br />

It might surprise us that historical poets want to reach outside <strong>of</strong> history, to a “FIELD,”<br />

an “unfilled space,” or, as Olson writes during his investigation <strong>of</strong> Mayan culture, “the<br />

substances <strong>of</strong> history now useful lie outside, under, right here, anywhere but in the direct<br />

continuum <strong>of</strong> society as we have had it…” (SW, 84). It is necessary to see that that this space<br />

is not ahistorical so much as a gesture to events or people that have never been subsumed in<br />

an <strong>of</strong>ficial record and hence remain outside our knowledge <strong>of</strong> the past and unavailable to the<br />

conceptual resources that allow us to think about inheritance. Only from this perspective<br />

does it make sense to talk about inheritance in works by Pound, Olson, and Howe. They<br />

each want an inheritance that goes beyond or beneath our received inheritance. To reach<br />

“outside” exposes received inheritance to its shortcomings—but then it enables the<br />

founding <strong>of</strong> an alternative, more open inheritance which has yet to be codified. Howe cites<br />

such an inheritance when she says, “Here is unappropriated autonomy. Uncounted occupied<br />

space. No covenant <strong>of</strong> King and people. No centralized State. Heavy pressure <strong>of</strong> finding no<br />

content. Openers <strong>of</strong> the breach.” (BM, 49). This “Here” has the promise <strong>of</strong> unforeseen<br />

initiative in an open space. The idea is that inheritance <strong>of</strong> the conventional kind—at it is<br />

imposed by textbooks, national holidays, famous men and so forth—never accounts for<br />

22 See his preface to Revolution <strong>of</strong> the Word (1974) in Jerome Rothenberg, Pre-faces & Other Writings (New<br />

York: New Directions, 1981), 101.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!