02.04.2013 Views

CONTENTS

CONTENTS

CONTENTS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

234 MIHAIELA LUPEA (1)<br />

For reducing Π12 we apply the rule (S3). No extension of the initial theory satisfies<br />

the constraint L¬T , so the default sequent Π12 is reduced to a basic anti-sequent and<br />

therefore is a true sequent according to the following:<br />

Q,R,T,H,¬P ⇒¬T<br />

Π12:{M(P ∧S),L¬T };({Q,R},{d3= R:¬P<br />

H<br />

,d4= H:T<br />

T });{ Q<br />

S } ↦−→T (S3)<br />

Π2 can also be reduced to basic sequent/anti-sequents, therefore the initial sequent:<br />

∅; ({Q, R} , {d1, d2, d3, d4}); ∅ ↦−→ T is true and thus T is a skeptical constrained<br />

default consequence of ∆.<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

In this paper we have introduced an axiomatic system which formalizes the skeptical<br />

nonmonotonic inference in constrained default logic. This system is based on<br />

sequent and anti-sequent calculi for classical logics and uses specific rules for the<br />

defaults. Using the monotonic rules called residues and constraints for the applied<br />

defaults, the default reasoning process becomes a monotonic one.<br />

References<br />

[1] Bonatti, P.A., Olivetti, N., “Sequent Calculi for Propositional Nonmonotonic Logics”, ACM<br />

Trans. Comput. Log., 2002, pp. 226–278.<br />

[2] Lupea, M., “Nonmonotonic inference operations for default logics”, ECIT - Symposium on<br />

Knowledge-based Systems and Expert Systems, Iasi, Romania, 2002, pp. 1–12.<br />

[3] Lupea, M., “Axiomatization of credulous reasoning in default logics using sequent calculus”,<br />

10-th International Symposium SYNASC 2008, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 49–55.<br />

[4] Mikitiuk, A., Truszczynsky, M.,“Constrained and rational default logics”, Proceedings of<br />

IJCAI-95, Morgan Kaufman, 1995, pp. 1509–1515.<br />

[5] Milnikel, R.S., “Sequent calculi for skeptical reasoning in predicate default logic and other<br />

nonmonotonic logics”, pp. 1-40, Kluwer, 2004.<br />

[6] Reiter, R., “A Logic for Default reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence 13, 1980, pp. 81–132.<br />

[7] Schaub, T.H., “Considerations on default logics”, Ph.D. Thesis, Technischen Hochschule<br />

Darmstadt, Germany, 1992.<br />

[8] Stalnaker, R.C., “What is a nonmonotonic consequence relation”, Fundamenta Informaticae,<br />

21, 1995, pp. 7–21.<br />

(1) Babes¸-Bolyai University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Cluj-<br />

Napoca, Romania<br />

E-mail address: lupea@cs.ubbcluj.ro

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!