Technical highlights - Department of Primary Industries ...
Technical highlights - Department of Primary Industries ...
Technical highlights - Department of Primary Industries ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Part 2 Landscape protection and restoration<br />
13. Biological control <strong>of</strong> cat’s claw creeper (Macfadyena unguis-cati)<br />
Project dates<br />
September 2002 – June 2014<br />
Project leader<br />
Dr K. Dhileepan<br />
Ecosciences Precinct<br />
Tel: (07) 3255 4449<br />
Email: k.dhileepan@deedi.qld.gov.au<br />
Other staff in 2010–11<br />
Di Taylor and Mariano Treviño<br />
Objective<br />
Achieve biological control <strong>of</strong> cat’s claw<br />
creeper using introduced insect species.<br />
Rationale<br />
Cat’s claw creeper (Macfadyena unguiscati),<br />
an invasive liana native <strong>of</strong> Central<br />
and South America, is a major weed<br />
in coastal Queensland and New South<br />
Wales, where it poses a significant<br />
threat to biodiversity in riparian and<br />
rainforest communities. The plant is<br />
a structural parasite and produces<br />
stolons and subterranean root tubers.<br />
Biological control appears the most<br />
suitable management option for this<br />
weed. Management objectives focus<br />
on reducing the rate <strong>of</strong> shoot growth<br />
to limit the weed’s ability to climb and<br />
smother native vegetation, as well as<br />
reducing tuber biomass to minimise the<br />
tuber bank.<br />
Methods<br />
Host-specificity tests<br />
Host-specificity testing is conducted<br />
using potted test plants in a<br />
temperature-controlled (22 °C to 27 °C)<br />
quarantine insectary. We evaluate the<br />
potential host range <strong>of</strong> the leaf-mining<br />
buprestid beetle (Hylaeogena jureceki)<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> larval survival and<br />
development, adult feeding and survival,<br />
and oviposition preference using choice<br />
and no-choice tests involving 38 plant<br />
species in 12 families.<br />
Field-release and monitoring<br />
We mass-rear and field-release two<br />
biological control agents, the leafsucking<br />
tingid (Carvalhotingis visenda)<br />
and leaf-tying moth (Hypocosmia<br />
pyrochroma), in partnership with<br />
community groups. We use a simple<br />
and cost-effective method to mass-rear<br />
the leaf-tying moth by replacing potted<br />
plants with field-collected cut foliage<br />
to allow greater numbers <strong>of</strong> insects<br />
to be released in the field. After fieldrelease<br />
we conduct recovery surveys to<br />
determine the field establishment status<br />
<strong>of</strong> C. visenda and H. pyrochroma. At<br />
all release sites, we spend 20 minutes<br />
visually examining cat’s claw creeper<br />
plants and recording the incidence and<br />
abundance <strong>of</strong> C. visenda eggs, nymphs<br />
and adults and H. pyrochroma larvae.<br />
Progress in 2010–11<br />
Host-specificity tests<br />
We completed host-specificity tests<br />
<strong>of</strong> the leaf-mining buprestid beetle<br />
(H. jureceki) in quarantine at the<br />
Ecosciences Precinct in May 2011.<br />
These tests support previous studies<br />
from South Africa indicating that the<br />
beetle is highly host-specific and does<br />
not pose risk to any non-target plants<br />
in Australia. Minor exploratory adult<br />
feeding occurred on eight non-target<br />
species and oviposition on one nontarget<br />
species, but larval development<br />
occurred only on M. unguis-cati.<br />
Observations indicate that this is a<br />
highly damaging insect with two<br />
destructive life stages: larvae mine<br />
within the leaves and adults chew holes<br />
into leaves. Under laboratory conditions,<br />
high populations can completely<br />
defoliate cat’s claw creeper plants.<br />
A short generation time, longliving<br />
adults and predator-evading<br />
characteristics suggest that rapid<br />
population growth is likely in the<br />
field. We have applied to the relevant<br />
regulatory authorities to release this<br />
agent in Australia.<br />
Field-release and monitoring<br />
No further field-releases <strong>of</strong> the leafsucking<br />
tingid (C. visenda) were made<br />
after June 2010. Field-release <strong>of</strong> the<br />
leaf-tying moth (H. pyrochroma) was<br />
continued until October 2010. Over three<br />
years, 1272 adult moths, 77 750 mature<br />
larvae and 837 pupae have been released<br />
across 36 sites in Queensland and New<br />
South Wales. Field establishment status<br />
<strong>of</strong> the moth was not monitored due to<br />
relocation to the Ecosciences Precinct.<br />
Funding in 2010–11<br />
• Land Protection Fund ($148 000)<br />
• Queensland Government (Blueprint<br />
for the Bush)<br />
Collaborators<br />
• Stefan Neser and Anthony King<br />
[Agricultural Research Council—Plant<br />
Protection Research Institute (ARC-<br />
PPRI), South Africa]<br />
• Dr Tanya Scharaschkin (Queensland<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Science and<br />
Engineering Faculty)<br />
• Local government and community<br />
groups across south-eastern and<br />
central Queensland<br />
More information<br />
Key publications<br />
Dhileepan, K, Treviño, M, Bayliss, D,<br />
Saunders, M, Shortus, M, McCarthy, J,<br />
Snow, EL et al. 2010, ‘Introduction and<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> Carvalhotingis visenda<br />
(Hemiptera: Tingidae) as a biological<br />
control agent for cat’s claw creeper<br />
Macfadyena unguis-cati (Bignoniaceae)<br />
in Australia’, Biological Control<br />
55(1): 58–62.<br />
Dhileepan, K, Bayliss, D & Treviño, M<br />
2010, ‘Thermal tolerance and potential<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> Carvalhotingis visenda<br />
(Hemiptera: Tingidae), a biological<br />
control agent for cat’s claw creeper,<br />
Macfadyena unguis-cati (Bignoniaceae)’,<br />
Bulletin <strong>of</strong> Entomological Research<br />
100(2): 159–66.<br />
Part 2 Landscape protection and restoration 29