05.04.2013 Views

WEALTH, DISPOSABLE INCOME AND CONSUMPTION - Economics

WEALTH, DISPOSABLE INCOME AND CONSUMPTION - Economics

WEALTH, DISPOSABLE INCOME AND CONSUMPTION - Economics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3<br />

Cumulative growth factors used to evaluate human wealth<br />

state xˆ \rˆ<br />

1 2 3 ... 24 25<br />

value xˆ \rˆ –0.0067 –0.0049 –0.0031 ... 0.0341 0.0359<br />

1 –0.0270 114.1 112.9 111.7 ... 85.4 84.5<br />

2 –0.0244 114.2 113.0 111.7 ... 85.5 84.6<br />

3 –0.0219 114.3 113.1 111.8 ... 85.5 84.7<br />

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />

24 0.0320 116.1 115.0 113.7 ... 86.9 86.0<br />

25 0.0346 116.2 115.0 113.8 ... 87.0 86.1<br />

Comparing the cumulative growth factors across states we see that<br />

the higher is the real interest rate in the current state, the lower is the<br />

cumulative growth factor and, thus, human wealth. This largely reflects<br />

the persistence of real interest rate movements as captured in the estimated<br />

VAR. An above average realization of rt raises the probability of an above<br />

average realization of rt + 1 and thus lowers the expected present value of<br />

future net income growth. Reinforcing this own effect is a cross-effect stemming<br />

from the negative relationship between the real interest rate and net<br />

income growth. An above average realization of rt also lowers the<br />

expected value of future net income growth, thereby further reducing<br />

human wealth. The quantitative impact on human wealth of a rise in the<br />

interest rate depends on the initial state of the system, which reflects the<br />

non-linear nature of the problem. To be more concrete, the response of the<br />

cumulative growth factor to a positive 25-basis-point shock to the real<br />

interest rate (at quarterly rates) ranges between –1.4 and –1.8 per cent, with<br />

the larger responses coming when r is near its mean.<br />

The effects of innovations in net income growth are much smaller,<br />

which reflects the fact that shocks to net income provide very little information<br />

about the future. Net income growth exhibits very little serial correlation,<br />

and there are no significant cross-effects in the estimated VAR of net<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!