WEALTH, DISPOSABLE INCOME AND CONSUMPTION - Economics
WEALTH, DISPOSABLE INCOME AND CONSUMPTION - Economics
WEALTH, DISPOSABLE INCOME AND CONSUMPTION - Economics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 3<br />
Cumulative growth factors used to evaluate human wealth<br />
state xˆ \rˆ<br />
1 2 3 ... 24 25<br />
value xˆ \rˆ –0.0067 –0.0049 –0.0031 ... 0.0341 0.0359<br />
1 –0.0270 114.1 112.9 111.7 ... 85.4 84.5<br />
2 –0.0244 114.2 113.0 111.7 ... 85.5 84.6<br />
3 –0.0219 114.3 113.1 111.8 ... 85.5 84.7<br />
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...<br />
24 0.0320 116.1 115.0 113.7 ... 86.9 86.0<br />
25 0.0346 116.2 115.0 113.8 ... 87.0 86.1<br />
Comparing the cumulative growth factors across states we see that<br />
the higher is the real interest rate in the current state, the lower is the<br />
cumulative growth factor and, thus, human wealth. This largely reflects<br />
the persistence of real interest rate movements as captured in the estimated<br />
VAR. An above average realization of rt raises the probability of an above<br />
average realization of rt + 1 and thus lowers the expected present value of<br />
future net income growth. Reinforcing this own effect is a cross-effect stemming<br />
from the negative relationship between the real interest rate and net<br />
income growth. An above average realization of rt also lowers the<br />
expected value of future net income growth, thereby further reducing<br />
human wealth. The quantitative impact on human wealth of a rise in the<br />
interest rate depends on the initial state of the system, which reflects the<br />
non-linear nature of the problem. To be more concrete, the response of the<br />
cumulative growth factor to a positive 25-basis-point shock to the real<br />
interest rate (at quarterly rates) ranges between –1.4 and –1.8 per cent, with<br />
the larger responses coming when r is near its mean.<br />
The effects of innovations in net income growth are much smaller,<br />
which reflects the fact that shocks to net income provide very little information<br />
about the future. Net income growth exhibits very little serial correlation,<br />
and there are no significant cross-effects in the estimated VAR of net<br />
15