07.04.2013 Views

^ f. UBBARV - JScholarship - Johns Hopkins University

^ f. UBBARV - JScholarship - Johns Hopkins University

^ f. UBBARV - JScholarship - Johns Hopkins University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VISION II<br />

shall consider these according as they bear upon the organ<br />

{ov function), the medium, or the object of vision. It is to<br />

be noticed that Alcmaeon, with whom we begin, has left<br />

US no Information on what he conceived to be the nature<br />

of the medium or the object. His recorded views are concerned<br />

only with the visual organ, its functions, and its<br />

relationship to the organism as a whole.<br />

Alcmaeon of Crotona.<br />

§ 3. ' Seeing takes place,' says Alcmaeon ^, ' by reflexion Alcmaeon<br />

in the diaphanous dement.' ' Alcmaeon of Crotona ^ held tona on<br />

that the eyes see through the environing water. That [each '^* *^.°^*<br />

eye] contains fire is, indeed, manifest, for a flash takes place<br />

within it when it receives a stroke. It is with the glittering<br />

and diaphanous dement, however, that it sees, whenever<br />

this reflects an image (avTL(paivri), and it sees better in<br />

Proportion to the purity of this dement^.'<br />

Chalcidius * teils us that Alcmaeon was the first to<br />

practise dissection, and that to him, as well as (long afterwards)<br />

to Callisthenes and Herophilus, many important<br />

^ Stob. Ecl. Pkys. i. 52 (Diels, Box., p. 404, Vors. p. 104). I have<br />

translated Diels' {Box. proU. p. 223) Suggestion avTiKap.^iv for MS.<br />

äfri'X?p/'ii'='apprehension' by the diaphanous element, which still<br />

brings us to the idea of reflexion. 'AiTi'Aafii//'tj'=reflexion, corresponds to<br />

the ävTKpaivTj of Theophr. § 26; see next extract. To ascribe 'apprehensive'<br />

power to the Siaipaves within the eye is quite out of keeping with<br />

the doctrine of Alcmaeon, nor is he likely to have employed the term<br />

avriXijyjris. Indeed it surprises one to find even tö 8ta(paves—a distinctively<br />

Aristotelean word in this connexion—ascribed to him.<br />

^ Theophr. de Sens. § 26 (Diels, Vors., p. 104).<br />

' Wachtier, de Ale. Crot. (Teubner, 1896), p. 49, refers t« a-TiKßovn<br />

here to the fire and t^ 8ia(f)aveT to the water within the eye. But (niKßeiv<br />

is not often found used of the gleam of fire (which would rather be<br />

Xa/iffetj/), whereas it is regularly used of lustre, and of the glittering of<br />

water. Cf. Arist. 370* 18 cpaiveTai t6 vSaip ariKßeiv, and 561^ 32 iypov<br />

evecTTi X^-uKhv Ka\ ^)(p6v, cr(j)65pa (TTiKßov. Both participles should,<br />

notwithstanding the repetition of the article, be referred to the same<br />

thing, viz. the ' diaphanous' element in which the image is said to be<br />

reflected. C. Bäumker {Arist. Lekre von den äussern und innern<br />

Sinnesvermögen, p. 49) notices that in the passage above translated, the<br />

words hpav Se ra ariXßovri Kai tw Sia^ave'i form an iambic trimeter.<br />

* In Plat. Tim., p. 279, ed. Wrobel, pp. 340-1, ed. Meursius.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!