08.04.2013 Views

Narrative Point of View in Louise Erdrich's Tracks - MIUSE

Narrative Point of View in Louise Erdrich's Tracks - MIUSE

Narrative Point of View in Louise Erdrich's Tracks - MIUSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anthony Piccolo<br />

It Comes Up Different Every Time: <strong>Narrative</strong> <strong>Po<strong>in</strong>t</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>View</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Louise</strong> Erdrich‟s <strong>Tracks</strong><br />

also differentiates Paul<strong>in</strong>e‟s manner <strong>of</strong> narration from that <strong>of</strong> Nanapush‟s as the<br />

difference between a “diatribe” and a “dramatic monologue” (71). Jeanne Rosier<br />

Smith notes that<br />

the narrators <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tracks</strong> are more openly hostile to each other‟s stories (each<br />

claim<strong>in</strong>g the other lies) . . . and their philosophical and social differences reflect a<br />

community <strong>in</strong> the grip <strong>of</strong> spiritual and political crisis. (94)<br />

The crisis confront<strong>in</strong>g the Ojibwe 2 <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tracks</strong> is experienced and responded to very<br />

differently depend<strong>in</strong>g upon who is tell<strong>in</strong>g the story. As Perez-Castillo observes,<br />

Paul<strong>in</strong>e narrates from a place <strong>of</strong> “disease, death, spiritual despair” whereas Nanapush<br />

speaks from the position <strong>of</strong> “courageous and irreverent survivors” (qtd. <strong>in</strong> Smith 97).<br />

Also, as Connie A. Jacobs writes, “the truth <strong>of</strong> events lies somewhere <strong>in</strong> between the<br />

versions <strong>of</strong> these two narrators” (118). The reader does, <strong>in</strong>deed, cont<strong>in</strong>uously need to<br />

“shuttle” between the two versions <strong>of</strong> reality presented by Nanapush and Paul<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Erdrich presents us with these two essentially hostile, compet<strong>in</strong>g narrators and, thus,<br />

places the reader <strong>in</strong> a position <strong>of</strong> negotiat<strong>in</strong>g between the narrations <strong>in</strong> search <strong>of</strong> the<br />

truth. Although, as we shall see, our sympathies will clearly lie with Nanapush rather<br />

than Paul<strong>in</strong>e, Erdrich ensures that neither narrator is completely unbiased and<br />

trustworthy. What we are f<strong>in</strong>ally left with is a realization <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>evitable ambiguity<br />

<strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> any accurate presentation <strong>of</strong> events. This ambiguous nature <strong>of</strong> the truth is,<br />

I believe, the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the novel. Before, enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a discussion <strong>of</strong> Erdrich‟s use<br />

<strong>of</strong> these two narrators and the reader‟s confrontation with the ambiguity, it will be<br />

useful to first to discuss the historical background <strong>of</strong> the novel and the significance <strong>of</strong><br />

the moment <strong>in</strong> history when the story opens.<br />

2. <strong>Tracks</strong> and History<br />

- 121 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!