10.04.2013 Views

A GUIDE TO CAROTENOID ANALYSIS IN FOODS

A GUIDE TO CAROTENOID ANALYSIS IN FOODS

A GUIDE TO CAROTENOID ANALYSIS IN FOODS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18 A Guide to Carotenoid Analysis in Foods<br />

Absorbance<br />

sorption peak, designated III, and that of the middle<br />

absorption peak, designated II, taking the minimum<br />

between the two peaks as baseline, multiplied by 100<br />

(Britton 1995). In a few cases, such as ζ-carotene,<br />

III is greater than II, thus the %III/II value is slightly<br />

higher than 100 (Table 7). For conjugated<br />

ketocarotenoids, such as canthaxanthin and echinenone,<br />

the spectrum consists of a broad single maximum,<br />

having no defined fine structure, thus %III/II<br />

is 0.<br />

Wavelength<br />

Figure 11. Calculation of %III/II as indication of spectral fine<br />

structure (%III/II = III/II × 100).<br />

The absorption coefficient A1% of a carotenoid<br />

1cm<br />

(absorbance at a given wavelength of a 1% solution<br />

in spectrophotometer cuvette with a 1-cm light path)<br />

used in the calculation of the concentration also varies<br />

pronouncedly in different solvents (Table 8).<br />

Carotenoids in solution obey the Beer-Lambert<br />

law—their absorbance is directly proportional to the<br />

concentration. Thus, carotenoids are quantified spectrophotometrically.<br />

This quantification, however, depends<br />

on the availability of accurate absorption coefficients,<br />

which are difficult to obtain. The procedure<br />

normally involves weighing a small amount of the<br />

carotenoid, typically 1 to 2 mg, with an accuracy of<br />

±0.001 mg (Britton 1995). An accurate and sensitive<br />

balance is required and the carotenoid should be absolutely<br />

free from all contaminants, including residual<br />

solvent. Moreover, complete dissolution of the carotenoids<br />

in the desired solvent can be difficult. Thus,<br />

some published values may have some significant<br />

level of error or uncertainty (Britton 1995), and some<br />

discrepancies can be noted in the values presented in<br />

Table 8. Because authors choose different coefficients<br />

for some carotenoids (in the same solvents),<br />

this alone can account for a good part of the variations<br />

in analytic results. For the accuracy of both opencolumn<br />

chromatography and HPLC methods , reassessment<br />

of the absorption coefficients is warranted.<br />

Adsorption and Partition Properties<br />

The chromatographic behavior of carotenoids bears<br />

a definite relationship with their structures. However,<br />

chromatographic data cannot be used as sole criteria<br />

for carotenoid’s identity. Nevertheless, these data<br />

serve as useful complementary information. In normalphase<br />

open-column chromatography, the adsorption<br />

affinity depends on the number of conjugated double<br />

bonds, cyclization, and the presence of oxygen<br />

substituents.<br />

The influence of the double bonds is best illustrated<br />

by the adsorption affinities of the acyclic carotenoids,<br />

which elute in the sequence phytoene, phytofluene,<br />

ζ-carotene, neurosporene, and lycopene. Comparing<br />

monocyclic and bicyclic carotenes, δ-carotene elutes<br />

before γ-carotene, and α-carotene elutes before βcarotene.<br />

Cyclization decreases the adsorption affinity.<br />

Thus, β-carotene is much more weakly adsorbed than<br />

γ-carotene, which in turn elutes before lycopene.<br />

The presence of oxygen substituents increases<br />

adsorption, the extent of such increase depending on<br />

the type, number, and location of the functions. This<br />

is demonstrated in a silica thin layer developed with<br />

3% methanol in benzene or 5% methanol in toluene,<br />

in which all carotenes elute with the solvent front and<br />

the xanthophylls distributed in the plate according to<br />

the number and type of substituents present (Figure<br />

12).<br />

The hydroxyl group exerts a great influence on<br />

adsorption; methylation, acetylation, and silylation<br />

markedly reduce this effect. The adsorption affinity<br />

of a carbonyl group is less than that of a free hydroxyl<br />

substituent. The contribution of the functional groups<br />

on adsorption affinity increases in the sequence<br />

(Davies 1976)<br />

-OR < -C=O < 2 [-C=O] < -OH < -COOH<br />

The 5,8-epoxide is more strongly adsorbed than<br />

is the corresponding 5,6-epoxide. Thus, the adsorption<br />

affinity of β-carotene and its epoxides on an alumina<br />

thin layer increases in the following order (El-Tinay<br />

and Chichester 1970):<br />

β-carotene < 5,6-epoxide < 5,6,5´,6´-diepoxide < 5,8epoxide<br />

< 5,6,5´,8´-diepoxide < 5,8,5´,8´-diepoxide<br />

The effects of more than one oxygen substituent<br />

are not always additive; a second substituent in the<br />

same end group tends to have less influence than the<br />

first.<br />

The order of elution of carotenoids in a given<br />

adsorbent-solvent system does not vary but the order<br />

may differ in different adsorbents. For example, β-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!