QUARTERLY REPORT Quarter 2 of 2012 - Холдинг МРСК

Indicator Description H1 2011 H1 2012
- reestablished reserve 72,420
- income from sale of securities 2,057,382
Other expense (rubles in thousands)
(1,630,300) (96,537)
Including - expense from sale of securities (1,544,242)
- other expense (86,058) (96,537)
Profit/loss before tax (rubles in thousands) 2,668,113 2,576,741
Profit tax and other dues (235,101) (239,712)
Net profit/loss (rubles in thousands) 2,433,012 2,337,029
The analysis of factors showed that the Company’s performance result was mainly affected by interests in other
entities.
Factors Affecting the Amount of the Company’s Profit (for H1 2012)
Indicator Level of Factor (%)
Balance of income/expense from operating activities 77.65%
Including:
- balance of services in relation to organizing operation of and to developing UPS 19.35%
- balance of income from interests in other entities 56.83%
- balance of income from leases 1.47%
Balance of other income/expense 32.61%
Tax factor effects -10.26%
Assessment of Factors Affecting the Change in Net Profit
Indicator Indicator Deviation (H1 2012 Actuals
from H1 2011 Actuals)
(rubles in millions)
Level of Factor Affecting
Change in Net Profit (%)
Revenues 111.5 -116.20%
Production costs 152.3 -158.64%
Selling and administrative expenses 0 0%
Other income -1,584.4 1,650.71%
Other expense -1,533.8 1,597.95%
Profit tax and other similar dues 4.6 -4.80%
Net profit -95.9 100%
The issuer’s management bodies have different opinions about reasons or the degree of their influence on the
issuer’s financial and economic performance: No
A member of the issuer’s Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) or a member of the issuer’s collegial
executive body has a dissenting opinion about the above-mentioned reasons and/or the degree of their
influence on the issuer’s financial and economic performance, which opinion is contained in the minutes of a
meeting of the issuer’s Board of Directors (Supervisory Board) or the issuer’s collegial executive body that
dealt with the relevant issues, and insists that this opinion be included in the quarterly report: No
4.2. Liquidity of the Issuer, Capital and Current Asset Adequacy
52