Design of Experiments - US Army Conference on Applied Statistics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Infeasible Factor Combinations Especially when there are categorical factors with multiple levels, it is <strong>of</strong>ten the case that certain factor combinations are either infeasible or even impossible to run. For example the Navy attack aircraft, A4, could not operate at night. The A6 was able to operate day or night. Suppose you want to run an experiment with both aircraft testing three different weapon systems under varying light conditions. How can we accomplish this given the problem with the A4 not being able to fly at night?
Module 7 - Summary • Constraints on design factors, unusual blocking requirements, and non-standard models are common in RSM • Optimal designs are a logical way to solve these problems. • Objective is to use a design that is customized to the specific problem
Page 1 and 2:
Design of<
Page 3 and 4:
What Is a Designed
Page 5 and 6:
What Is a Response? A response is a
Page 7 and 8:
What is a model? a simplified mathe
Page 9 and 10:
Important Points from the Fathers <
Page 11 and 12:
ANOVA Model for Mileage Study Note
Page 13 and 14:
Orthogonal Coding and Orthogonal <s
Page 15 and 16:
ANOVA/Regression Model - Matrix Not
Page 17 and 18:
Categorical Factor Coding - 2 level
Page 19 and 20:
Continuous Factor Coding MR - midra
Page 21 and 22:
The Model/Design R
Page 23 and 24:
The Model/Design R
Page 25 and 26:
Design Optimality
Page 27 and 28:
Simple experiment for three factors
Page 29 and 30:
Standard designs using an optimal d
Page 31 and 32:
INPUTS (Factors) Airspeed Turn Rate
Page 33 and 34:
Fractional Factorial designs are D-
Page 35:
Consider the 2 5-1 - Again Created
Page 38 and 39:
JMP Demo Relative Variance
Page 40 and 41:
INPUTS (Factors) 40 SPEAR AGM Tests
Page 42 and 43:
Suppose that we want to focus on ma
Page 44 and 45:
Alias Matrix Effect Intercept A B C
Page 46 and 47:
Module 2 - Summary 1. Main message
Page 48 and 49:
Regular Designs ma
Page 50 and 51:
Define Nonisomorphic Two designs ar
Page 53 and 54:
Screening for Shrinkage Contrasts T
Page 55 and 56:
Where Did the Data in this Experime
Page 57 and 58:
Stepwise Fit Response: Shrinkage St
Page 59 and 60:
No-Confounding Design</stro
Page 61 and 62:
Hall II 15 Factor Design</s
Page 63 and 64:
Hall IV 15 Factor Design</s
Page 65 and 66:
Constructing the Recommended 6 Fact
Page 67 and 68:
Color Plot for the Standard Minimum
Page 69 and 70:
Recommended Nonregular 7 Factor <st
Page 71 and 72:
Color Plot for the Standard Minimum
Page 73 and 74:
Recommended Nonregular 8 Factor <st
Page 75 and 76:
Alternatives to Resolution III <str
Page 77 and 78:
Recommended 10 Factor Desig
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Note that both main effects and two
Page 85 and 86:
Main effects are not aliased. One t
Page 87 and 88:
Plackett-Burman Design</str
Page 89:
A 12-Factor Example 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 92 and 93:
The data for the example came from
Page 94 and 95:
Embarrassing Problem Case Suppose w
Page 96 and 97:
Reactor Case Study Box, Hunter and
Page 98 and 99:
Robust Screening Design</st
Page 100 and 101:
Robust Screening Design</st
Page 102 and 103:
The Case for Non-orthogonal <strong
Page 104 and 105:
References Hall, M. Jr. (1961). Had
Page 106 and 107:
Module 4 - Blocking • Many experi
Page 108 and 109:
Blocking • Blocking is a techniqu
Page 110 and 111: The randomized complete block desig
Page 112 and 113: Cars The Latin Square Desig
Page 114 and 115: JMP Demo
Page 116 and 117: Another Example of
Page 118 and 119: In general, if there are p treatmen
Page 120 and 121: Back to tire testing • Suppose th
Page 122 and 123: Module 4 - Summary • Most design
Page 124 and 125: Split-plot Graphic Definition
Page 126 and 127: Model for Split-plot Experi
Page 128 and 129: General procedure Split-plot <stron
Page 130 and 131: Scenario 1. Four factors Split-Plot
Page 132 and 133: Ad hoc Design #1
Page 134 and 135: I-optimal Split-Plot Design
Page 136 and 137: OLS vs GLS Data Analysis OLS Analys
Page 138 and 139: Module 6 - Introduction to RSM •
Page 140 and 141: E(y) = f( ) The response surface Th
Page 142 and 143: Response Surface Methodology • Wh
Page 144 and 145: CI on the mean response at a point
Page 147 and 148: Three Typical Applications
Page 149 and 150: Useful References on RSM • Box, G
Page 151 and 152: Categorical and Continuous Variable
Page 153 and 154: Goals Module 7 - RSM with Factor Co
Page 155 and 156: A problem with a constrained design
Page 157 and 158: JMP Default RSM Design</str
Page 159: Design Comparison
Page 163 and 164: Robust Parameter Design</st
Page 165 and 166: The Response Surface Approach Secti
Page 167 and 168: Filtration Robust Processing Exampl
Page 169 and 170: JMP Demo
Page 171 and 172: • Goals Module 9 Mixture
Page 173 and 174: Mixtures occur in lots of</
Page 175 and 176: Simplex Designs Si
Page 177 and 178: An experiment involving shampoo for
Page 179 and 180: Makeup of an Aircr
Page 181 and 182: Mixtures in JMP Ternary Plot .1 X1
Page 183 and 184: • Goals Module 10 - Covering Arra
Page 185 and 186: Covering Array Definition A coverin
Page 187 and 188: Covering arrays 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2
Page 189 and 190: Covering arrays and sof</st
Page 191 and 192: Example - Air to ground missile sys
Page 193 and 194: CA(N:2,k,2) Results k 2-3 4 5-10 11
Page 195 and 196: References • R. Brownlie, J. Prow
Page 197 and 198: Module 10 - Summary • Covering ar
Page 199 and 200: 199 What is a supersaturated design
Page 201 and 202: 201 A more general definition… Su
Page 203 and 204: 203 Classical “supersaturated”
Page 205 and 206: 205 Case 2 - Fractional Factorial <
Page 207 and 208: 207 Problem D-Optimal designs depen
Page 209 and 210: 209 Example 2 6-2 Fractional Factor
Page 211 and 212:
211 Bayesian D-Optimal designs Find
Page 213 and 214:
213 Question Why should only higher
Page 215 and 216:
Card Trick in JMP
Page 217:
DOX Course - Final Thoughts 1. Opti
show all

Design of Experiments - US Army Conference on Applied Statistics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?