2009-09 - IRI Portugal - FINAL REPORT - IMPEL
2009-09 - IRI Portugal - FINAL REPORT - IMPEL
2009-09 - IRI Portugal - FINAL REPORT - IMPEL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1. Executive Summary<br />
The <strong>IRI</strong> scheme is a voluntary scheme developed by the <strong>IMPEL</strong> Network providing for<br />
informal reviews of environmental authorities in <strong>IMPEL</strong> Member countries.<br />
In line with the Recommendation for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections<br />
(RMCEI), this informal review of the Portuguese Environmental and Spatial Planning<br />
General Inspectorate (IGAOT) by a broad cross section of the <strong>IMPEL</strong> network, focused<br />
upon the inspection and enforcement of the IPPC and SEVESO Directives and where<br />
relevant other EU Directives applicable to industrial processes covered by the RMCEI.<br />
Throughout, the <strong>IRI</strong> team have identified several examples of ‘good practice’ and<br />
‘opportunities for development’, when considering the implementation of the above<br />
Directives during the review. Specifically, the review team have highlighted the<br />
following as particularly strong examples of this:<br />
Good practices:<br />
• The central and formalised screening & tracking system for complaints;<br />
• The exceptional Inspectorate’s information systems (GIS, GESTIGAOT and Risk<br />
Assessment) and;<br />
• The problem solving objectives and targets as described in their annual Activity Plan.<br />
Opportunities for development:<br />
• To develop multi-annual objectives;<br />
• To make inspection reporting more efficient and;<br />
• To use different types of interventions.<br />
The review team considers that the objectives of the area of EC environmental law<br />
within the scope of the review of IGAOT are being delivered in <strong>Portugal</strong>. Furthermore<br />
the arrangements for environmental inspection and enforcement are broadly in line<br />
with the RMCEI.<br />
Overall the review team is impressed by the range of instruments and provisions that<br />
IGAOT has developed over the last few years. This has significantly helped IGAOT in the<br />
process of professionalization to which it is strongly dedicated. IGAOT has shown that a<br />
relatively small inspection organisation can achieve major improvements and may serve<br />
as an example for inspecton organisations with a similar size and scope of work.<br />
4