2009-09 - IRI Portugal - FINAL REPORT - IMPEL
2009-09 - IRI Portugal - FINAL REPORT - IMPEL
2009-09 - IRI Portugal - FINAL REPORT - IMPEL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Annex 1<br />
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR <strong>IMPEL</strong> PROJECT<br />
No Name of project<br />
Test of the Reviewed <strong>IRI</strong> Scheme on the Portuguese Environmental<br />
and Spatial Planning General Inspectorate (IGAOT)<br />
1. Scope<br />
1.1. Background The Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council<br />
providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections in the<br />
Member States (2001/331/EC) (RMCEI) says in recommendation III<br />
(4).<br />
“In order to promote best practice across the Community,<br />
Member States may, in co-operation with <strong>IMPEL</strong>, consider<br />
the establishment of a scheme, under which Member States<br />
report and offer advice on Inspectorates and inspection<br />
procedures in Member States, paying due regard to the<br />
different systems and contexts in which they operate, and<br />
report to the Member States concerned on their findings.”<br />
<strong>IMPEL</strong> was willing to take this forward and to foresee the eventual<br />
need for arrangements to review implementation of such<br />
recommendations and proposes a voluntary scheme for the purpose.<br />
The potential benefits of this scheme include:<br />
• Encouragement of capacity–building in EU Member State<br />
inspectorates.<br />
• Encouragement of further collaboration between EU Member<br />
State inspectorates on common issues or problems, on exchange<br />
of experience and on development and dissemination of good<br />
practice in environmental regulation.<br />
• Provision of advice to candidate inspectorates who may be<br />
seeking an external view of their structure, operation or<br />
performance by trusted, knowledgeable and independent<br />
counterparts for the purpose of benchmarking and continuous<br />
improvement of their organisation.<br />
• The spread of good practice leading to improved<br />
quality of inspectorates and inspections, and contributing to<br />
continuous improvement of quality and consistency of<br />
application of environmental law across the EU.<br />
The Helsinki Plenary Meeting of <strong>IMPEL</strong>, in December 1999,<br />
requested that proposals be drawn up for “a voluntary scheme for<br />
reporting and offering advice on inspectorates and inspection<br />
procedures” (the “scheme”). This was against the background of<br />
preparation of a European Parliament and Council Recommendation<br />
on Providing Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the<br />
Member States and the expectation that further recommendations<br />
would follow on Minimum Criteria for Inspector Qualifications and<br />
for Inspector Training.<br />
40