25.04.2013 Views

3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Miss - Planning Tribunal

3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Miss - Planning Tribunal

3 4 CHAIRMAN: Good morning, Miss - Planning Tribunal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

1 prepared by the manager, it's submitted to the members, depending on the<br />

2 decision of the members, it then goes into a minute. The minutes go back to<br />

3 the members for confirmation and when they have been confirmed, they are then<br />

4 recorded. Now, this is a confirmed minute, in other words, it has been back to<br />

5 the members for confirmation and they accept it, so that would have happened in<br />

6 respect of 1993. The report of 1993 would have gone to the members, they would<br />

7 have discussed it, confirmed it, and the manager's referring back to this there<br />

8 in the opening statement of his report in this case and then he goes on to deal<br />

9 with, it is a somewhat fairly bleak report, there was not a lot of information<br />

10 in it, but it does tell us what the zonings were, what the rezonings were<br />

11 proposed, what the amendment proposed, the representations we got and the<br />

12 manager's recommendation. Now, say, it is quite a short report but that would<br />

13 have been the format. So what you are looking at here is a confirmed minute of<br />

14 a meeting that took place.<br />

15 Q 57 I fully accept that, Mr. McGlynn. The point I am trying to make is that it's a<br />

16 confirmed minute of a meeting that did take place and I am putting it to you<br />

17 that the minute is in respect of the meeting that was held on the 28th April.<br />

18 It seems to be no other possible --<br />

19 A No, that wouldn't be correct. I couldn't agree with you. The reason being, as<br />

20 I said, I don't have the date of this meeting in front of me because I said I<br />

21 think it was late --<br />

22<br />

23 JUDGE FAHERTY: 29th September, I think.<br />

24 A Yeah, now this report would have been submitted to that meeting on the 29th<br />

25 September and it refers to what occurred following the second display. The<br />

26 minute at the top in 1993 refers back to a previous meeting and would have been<br />

27 for the information for the members as to when this issue was dealt with last<br />

28 and then it goes on to set out what the position is. That's the way the<br />

29 manager's report would have been and there doesn't appear to have been any<br />

30 changes to the manager's report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!