01.05.2013 Views

industry news - SAPA

industry news - SAPA

industry news - SAPA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONTENTS<br />

Dear All<br />

If we were to think that the flavour enhancement saga<br />

was going to sleep we were clearly on planet Mars. On<br />

the 9th February, the Department of Agriculture, Forestry<br />

and Fisheries (DAFF) issued a press statement which<br />

essentially said that all South African companies adding<br />

any kind of flavour enhancement solutions to both<br />

portions and whole carcasses were acting illegally in<br />

terms of the Agricultural Product Standards Act. A rather<br />

dramatic claim wouldn't you agree? An urgent meeting<br />

with the DAFF later, and a new statement was issued which has helped bring us a bit<br />

closer to the position we were in before the first press release. In future, both parties<br />

have agreed to first speak to each other before running off to the media. We have<br />

enough expert legal advice to know that the flavour enhancement practices we follow<br />

(both brining and marinating) are legal, as are the various returns practices used by<br />

the different companies in terms of the Meat Safety Act. So that is not the issue, but<br />

the public perception of us is actually the real issue. I hope all broiler companies will<br />

accept and realise that this practice needs to be regulated and that we must reach<br />

agreement with the state on the best way forward. We had actually written to the<br />

Department of Agriculture in early 2006 suggesting some changes to the regulations,<br />

but we were not even afforded the courtesy of a reply. As you can see, this shows<br />

that our engagement with the Department is not new.<br />

“Indien ons voor die<br />

media-twak ’n goeie saak<br />

gepubliseer het waarom die<br />

praktyk van smaakverhoging<br />

tot voordeel van ALLE<br />

Suid-Afrikaners is, het ons<br />

moontlik regulering vermy”.<br />

Hoewel ons onsself ’n ontwikkelingstaat noem, is<br />

Suid-Afrika ’n intervensiestaat. Dit mag<br />

opdringerig klink, maar aangesien ’n sleutelrede<br />

om deur die proses van regeringsverandering te<br />

gaan was om in Suid-Afrika geleenthede vir al sy<br />

mense oop te stel, moet ons verwag dat die staat<br />

tussenbeide sal kom. Dit wil nie sê ons is ’n<br />

“ k i n d e r o p p a s s e r s t a a t ” s o o s s o m m i g e<br />

ontwikkelde state nie, maar een waarin die staat<br />

sy mag moet aanwend om maatskaplike<br />

verandering teweeg te bring. As mens dit so<br />

beskou, sou jy in staat moes wees om te begryp<br />

waarom regulering nodig is. Indien ons voor die media-twak ’n goeie saak<br />

gepubliseer het waarom die praktyk van smaakverhoging tot voordeel van ALLE<br />

Suid-Afrikaners is, het ons moontlik regulering vermy. Wysheid agterna is in die<br />

algemeen leersaam, maar ongelukkig verander dit nie die verlede nie.<br />

A follow up meeting to the October flavour enhancement / Independent Meat<br />

th<br />

Inspection system meeting held last October took place on the 16 February.<br />

Attendance was good and apart from the producer contingent we also had a number<br />

of key individuals from the DAFF, Department of Health and the National Regulator<br />

for Compulsory Standards. To try and avoid competition law concerns, our<br />

competition law attorneys, Denys Reitz, were also in attendance. We tried to deal<br />

with flavour enhancement by using descriptive categories, comparing our products to<br />

fruit squashes, fruit nectars, 'pure' fruit juices and freshly squeezed juice. This<br />

approach did not win universal favour as it is hard to find hard evidence as to when<br />

MAR |<br />

11<br />

| Features<br />

03<br />

10<br />

16<br />

21<br />

24<br />

26<br />

32<br />

36<br />

40<br />

46<br />

46<br />

47<br />

48<br />

49<br />

49<br />

50<br />

53<br />

54<br />

56<br />

57<br />

58<br />

62<br />

64<br />

65<br />

66<br />

03 | MARCH 2011 PLUIMVEE POULTRY BULLETIN<br />

From the desk of the CEO<br />

<strong>SAPA</strong> Statistics<br />

Modern Disease Control for a Modern<br />

Poultry Industry<br />

Pfizer and Comipharm launch the<br />

Pfizer Poultry Vaccine Range<br />

Die Implentering van Kwaliteit<br />

Bestuursisteme in die Pluimveebedryf<br />

Afrox achieves level 3 BBBEE Rating<br />

Northern Views - Indigestible<br />

Training Options at University of<br />

KwaZulu - Natal<br />

Grain Prices continue to shock the<br />

Poultry World<br />

ABC responds to budget<br />

SA’s Food Inflation compares<br />

favourably with BRIC Nations<br />

Alltech opens renovated US $200<br />

million Algae Facility<br />

Giving “Egg-head” an entirely new<br />

meaning<br />

Afri Compliance hernu hul kontrak met<br />

AFMA<br />

IEC London 2011 Conference<br />

Effects of incubation temperature on<br />

hatching and carcass performance of<br />

broilers<br />

Birthday Time<br />

Poultry Science - Contentious Issues<br />

on Poultry House Ventilation<br />

What is Egg Shell Quality and how to<br />

preserve it<br />

A Page in Time<br />

Focus - Arbor Acres Annual Conference<br />

Update from Astral sheds light on<br />

Poultry Industry Myths<br />

DPFO Page<br />

DownTime<br />

Blokkiesraaisel<br />

Poultry Bulletin | Pluimvee Bulletin<br />

Subscription rates: Free to members; non-members R395.00 p.a.<br />

Intekengeld: Gratis aan lede; Nie-lede R395 p.j<br />

Official mouthpiece of the Southern African Poultry Association.<br />

For private circulation only .<br />

Amptelike mondstuk van die Suider-Afrikaanse<br />

Pluimveevereniging.<br />

Alleenlik vir private verspreiding.<br />

Copyright Reserved | Kopiereg voorbehou.<br />

News, views, content and opinion in this publication does not<br />

necessarily represent the views/policies or positions of the<br />

Southern African Poultry Association.<br />

Nuus, standpunte, inhoud en menings in hierdie publikasie<br />

verteenwoordig nie noodwending die mening, beleid of standpunt<br />

van die SAPV nie.<br />

Published by:<br />

Suider Afrikaanse Pluimveevereniging<br />

Southern African Poultry Association<br />

Editor: Cameron Mackenzie - editor@sapoultry.co.za<br />

CEO: Kevin Lovell - kevin@sapoultry.co.za<br />

Brand Manager: Masanda Peter - masanda@sapoultry.co.za<br />

Advertising: Louisa Nel - advertising@ sapoultry.co.za<br />

Design and Layout: Jelliweb - lisa@jelliweb.co.za<br />

Subscriptions: Cynthia Ncube - sapaadmin@sapoultry.co.za<br />

Letters to / Briewe aan: editor@sapoultry.co.za<br />

Physical Address: Vesting Centre, Bosbok Road,<br />

Randpark Ridge, Randburg<br />

Postal Address: P.O. Box 1202, Honeydew,<br />

2040, South Africa<br />

Tel: 011 795 2051 | Fax: 011 795 3180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!