06.05.2013 Views

Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Word</strong> <strong>Pictures</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NT [Mat<strong>the</strong>w: Chapter 1]<br />

idiom.<br />

{Of <strong>the</strong> Holy Ghost} (\ek pneumatos hagiou\). The discovery that<br />

Mary was pregnant was <strong>in</strong>evitable and it is pla<strong>in</strong> that she had not<br />

told Joseph. She "was found with child" (\heureth• en gastri<br />

echousa\). This way of putt<strong>in</strong>g it, <strong>the</strong> usual Greek idiom, pla<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

shows that it was <strong>the</strong> discovery that shocked Joseph. He did not<br />

as yet know what Mat<strong>the</strong>w pla<strong>in</strong>ly asserts that <strong>the</strong> Holy Ghost, not<br />

Joseph and not any man, was responsible for <strong>the</strong> pregnancy of<br />

Mary. The problem of <strong>the</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong> Birth of Jesus has been a<br />

disturb<strong>in</strong>g fact to some through all <strong>the</strong> ages and is today to<br />

those who do not believe <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pre-existence of Christ, <strong>the</strong> Son<br />

of God, before his Incarnation on earth. This is <strong>the</strong> primal fact<br />

about <strong>the</strong> Birth of Christ. The Incarnation of Christ is clearly<br />

stated by Paul (2Co 8:9; Php 2:5-11; and <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> Col<br />

1:15-19) and by John (Joh 1:14; 17:5). If one frankly admits<br />

<strong>the</strong> actual pre-existence of Christ and <strong>the</strong> real Incarnation, he<br />

has taken <strong>the</strong> longest and most difficult step <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> matter of<br />

<strong>the</strong> supernatural Birth of Christ. That be<strong>in</strong>g true, no merely<br />

human birth without <strong>the</strong> supernatural element can possibly expla<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> facts. Incarnation is far more than <strong>the</strong> Indwell<strong>in</strong>g of God by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> human heart. To admit real <strong>in</strong>carnation and<br />

also full human birth, both fa<strong>the</strong>r and mo<strong>the</strong>r, creates a greater<br />

difficulty than to admit <strong>the</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong> Birth of Jesus begotten by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit, as Mat<strong>the</strong>w here says, and born of <strong>the</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong><br />

Mary. It is true that only Mat<strong>the</strong>w and Luke tell <strong>the</strong> story of <strong>the</strong><br />

supernatural birth of Jesus, though Joh 1:14 seems to refer to<br />

it. Mark has noth<strong>in</strong>g whatever concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> birth and childhood<br />

of Jesus and so cannot be used as a witness on <strong>the</strong> subject. Both<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w and Luke present <strong>the</strong> birth of Jesus as not accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary human birth. Jesus had no human fa<strong>the</strong>r. There is such a<br />

th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> nature as par<strong>the</strong>nogenesis <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower orders of life.<br />

But that scientific fact has no bear<strong>in</strong>g here. We see here God<br />

send<strong>in</strong>g his Son <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> world to be <strong>the</strong> world's Saviour and he<br />

gave him a human mo<strong>the</strong>r, but not a human fa<strong>the</strong>r so that Jesus<br />

Christ is both Son of God and Son of Man, <strong>the</strong> God Man. Mat<strong>the</strong>w<br />

tells <strong>the</strong> story of <strong>the</strong> birth of Jesus from <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t of<br />

Joseph as Luke gives it from <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t of Mary. The two<br />

narratives harmonize with each o<strong>the</strong>r. One credits <strong>the</strong>se most<br />

wonderful of all birth narratives accord<strong>in</strong>g as he believes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

love and power of Almighty God to do what he wills. There is no<br />

miracle with God who has all power and all knowledge. The laws of<br />

nature are simply <strong>the</strong> expression of God's will, but he has not<br />

http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/MT1.RWP.html (4 of 9) [28/08/2004 09:02:52 a.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!