- Page 1 and 2: Tuning the CARIS implementation of
- Page 3 and 4: Abstract This thesis is focused on
- Page 5 and 6: Resumen Esta tesis está orientada
- Page 7 and 8: Acknowledgements My sincere gratitu
- Page 9 and 10: 4.3 Bathymetry Associated with Stat
- Page 11: List of Figures Figure 2.1: Illustr
- Page 15 and 16: In the case of the bathymetric data
- Page 17 and 18: ATLAS FANSWEEP 20 is not one of the
- Page 19 and 20: Capture Distance Minimum were modif
- Page 21 and 22: • HIPS CUBE deep configuration, t
- Page 23 and 24: is performed. Several CARIS surface
- Page 25 and 26: are dependent on the nature of the
- Page 27 and 28: 2.2 Beamwidth, Resolution and Beam
- Page 29 and 30: In the FANSWEEP 20 electronic beamf
- Page 31 and 32: For vessel motion compensation ATLA
- Page 33 and 34: . Transducer referenced depth: trav
- Page 35 and 36: wave lost traveling through the wat
- Page 37 and 38: Sea bottom mistracking Figure 2.3:
- Page 39 and 40: deal with echoes that arrive at the
- Page 41 and 42: Recalling the previous chapter, the
- Page 43 and 44: The fjords’ basins are basically
- Page 45 and 46: 44m 124m Noise-data 168m Figure 3.4
- Page 47 and 48: contained in CARIS HIPS, where main
- Page 49 and 50: The advantage for bathymetric data
- Page 51 and 52: uncertainty. The BASE surface meets
- Page 53 and 54: The algorithm also has built-in che
- Page 55 and 56: 4.4.2 Assimilation (Gathering proce
- Page 57 and 58: hypothesis. Whether incoming soundi
- Page 59 and 60: The Density-Locale rule in HIPS is
- Page 61 and 62: the respective BASE surface. Since
- Page 63 and 64:
dimension and Reference Point (RP)
- Page 65 and 66:
5.2.3 Construction of a new Device
- Page 67 and 68:
Figure 5.3: Estimates of the perfor
- Page 69 and 70:
A new Field Sheet called CUBE was c
- Page 71 and 72:
In order to get comparison metrics
- Page 73 and 74:
6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In this c
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 6.1: Different CUBE configura
- Page 77 and 78:
noise-data affecting the surface re
- Page 79 and 80:
20% of depth or 2 metres from the n
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 6.3: Capture Distance Scale
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure 6.4: The effect of using mul
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 6.5: The CARIS surface gener
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 6.6: (a). The results of CAR
- Page 89 and 90:
The grid resolution selected was 5
- Page 91 and 92:
6.3.2 CUBE new configurations. Seve
- Page 93 and 94:
(a) (b) Figure 6.8: (a). Subset of
- Page 95 and 96:
51,23m 88,93m Figure 6.10: Top left
- Page 97 and 98:
6.4 Summary of results. 1. SHOA sur
- Page 99 and 100:
from the node. Thus, the node estim
- Page 101 and 102:
Interactive editing needs to be hel
- Page 103 and 104:
CARIS intends future implementation
- Page 105 and 106:
References and Bibliography Aber, J
- Page 107 and 108:
CARIS, Geomatics Software. (2006a).
- Page 109 and 110:
Llewellyn, K. (2006). Correction fo
- Page 111 and 112:
APPENDIX A Ancillary sensors of the
- Page 113 and 114:
100 APPENDIX B Device model for ATL
- Page 115 and 116:
102 APPENDIX C DUMP ATLAS SURF Util
- Page 117 and 118:
104 `B' Event Nr. 5 time 152.03 sec
- Page 119 and 120:
106 APPENDIX D HVF population. 106
- Page 121:
108 Vita Name: Miguel Ernesto Vásq