04.06.2013 Views

Surface magneto-plasmons in magnetic multilayers - Walther ...

Surface magneto-plasmons in magnetic multilayers - Walther ...

Surface magneto-plasmons in magnetic multilayers - Walther ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 2.4<br />

Simulation of the reflectivity of surface <strong>plasmons</strong> 23<br />

θB = arctan<br />

n2<br />

n1<br />

<br />

. (2.48)<br />

n1 and n2 are the refractive <strong>in</strong>dices of the two media. For BK7 the Brewster angle is<br />

about 33.4 ◦ [46] what matches with the simulated value.<br />

With <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g θ the reflectivity <strong>in</strong>creases and reaches 1 at θ ≈ 41.4 ◦ what is quite<br />

similar to the literature value of 41.34 ◦ (Eq. (2.23)). S<strong>in</strong>ce the simulation is done<br />

with a step size of 0.1 ◦ the difference between both values can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

lack of resolution <strong>in</strong> the simulation.<br />

When the prism is covered by a Ag film of dAg = 20 nm (Fig. 2.9(b)) then the<br />

reflectivity for θ = 0 ◦ goes up to 0.67. With <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g θ, R p slowly decreases and<br />

goes through a m<strong>in</strong>imum at θB = 38.6 ◦ and then <strong>in</strong>creases and reaches a maximum<br />

of 0.98 at θc, i.e. for total <strong>in</strong>ternal reflection. At somewhat larger θ, a m<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong><br />

R p develops at the resonance angle (θSPP = 44.2 ◦ ) of the surface <strong>plasmons</strong>. This can<br />

be expla<strong>in</strong>ed with destructive <strong>in</strong>terference (Sect. 2.3.1).<br />

For silver films with dAg = 50 nm the surface plasmon resonance dip gets sharper<br />

and θSPP shifts to 43 ◦ (Fig. 2.9(c)). While for dAg = 100 nm, a vanish<strong>in</strong>g resonance<br />

appears at θSPP = 42.9 ◦ (Fig. 2.9(d)).<br />

The change of R p at θSPP can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by radiation damp<strong>in</strong>g [9]. As expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> Sect. 2.3.1 the light at the metal-air <strong>in</strong>terface is radiated light <strong>in</strong>to the metal<br />

which <strong>in</strong>terferes with the <strong>in</strong>cident light at the prism-metal <strong>in</strong>terface. S<strong>in</strong>ce, the metal<br />

has a complex dielectric function, this back-radiated light is damped. This effect is<br />

called radiation damp<strong>in</strong>g. On <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the thickness of the metal films the radiation<br />

damp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases, so that the destructive <strong>in</strong>terference between the <strong>in</strong>cident and back-<br />

radiated light at the prism-metal <strong>in</strong>terface decreases and thus R p <strong>in</strong>creases. As the<br />

surface plasmon dip <strong>in</strong> R p is due to <strong>in</strong>terference the depth of the surface plasmon dip<br />

(the m<strong>in</strong>imal R p value) thus decreases. Now, decreas<strong>in</strong>g the metal film thickness at a<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> metal film thickness dopt the amplitude of the back-reflected light equals the<br />

amplitude of the <strong>in</strong>cident light and the phase of the back-reflected light is shifted by<br />

π, so that R p = 0. When the thickness is decreased further d < dopt the effect of the<br />

radiation damp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases aga<strong>in</strong> which yields an <strong>in</strong>crease of R p .<br />

For a s<strong>in</strong>gle layer the optimal layer thickness dopt for which the R p goes to zero at<br />

θ = θSPP can be calculated with a first order approximation equation reported by<br />

Kretschmann [34].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!