TRAPPED IN A MASONIC WORLD

To the best of my knowledge, what I have written is true and easily verifiable. If I have doubts about
the source, I will tell you and refer to it as being alleged. If I feel there is perhaps insufficient evidence, I
normally wouldn‘t bother including it, however at certain times, the ―no smoke without fire‖ analogy
maybe appropriate if I feel it might verify another point or issue etc. I‘m far from infallible, and
unintentional mistakes could be possible, and if the reader finds this is the case, I will be more than happy
to hear from them so as I can rectify the situation if possible, and if of course I feel a correction or deletion
is warranted to do so in the first place - and so as it doesn‘t reappear in any subsequent editions.
Working on two books simultaneously, my research represents almost three years of reading and
careful study, while analysing, source verifying and trying to make a logical deduction among the awash
of misinformation, dressed-up in the guise of being factual and true, when in fact it‘s deliberately put out
there hoping the enquirer will be ―hoodwinked‖, and fall foul of this propaganda or party-line kind of
deceit, so therefore whenever someone like me tries to expose the truth, they‘ll instead be quoting halftruths,
misinformation, disinformation or in fact damn right lies as opposed to it being true and something
factual and correct, - in which I can assure you is my sincere intention at all times. Every event and quote
presented here is 100% accurate as far as I am aware of, the many sources I have accrued my information
from have been listed the best I can following each chapter. I encourage, no-urge readers to explore and
verify these sources for themselves, as by doing so, it should and will most probably lead you onto much
more information and evidence - which of course I am limited to adequately do so here due to the sheer
volume of topics I‘m touching on.
It goes without saying, that there are well organised and concerted efforts-continuously under way to
suppress, bastardise or even alter many of the facts I detail, and some of these news links are mysteriously
disappearing even as I write. Wikileaks original website has been obliterated, though mirrored by many
other people, and I try to explain how and why this is occurring a little further on. Fortunately, in many
cases this information has been ―mirrored‖, copied and transcribed by various web users, and has therefore
been preserved from the censors, and you should still also be able to find a link to get to the data that may
have gone missing, or has been deleted from the original link from where it was first sourced.
Then again, much of the sources of information on the subjects I cover, also came from books,
newspapers, magazines and the media in general, including TV and radio news broadcasts, or and
programme makers, as well as an array of other sources, such as a direct confession from a third party to
me, or my own direct personal experiences and undisclosed information, - that for instance and for the very
first time, I expose and explain about the time when I made a ―secret deal‖ with the police in order to be
granted immunity from charges on a £1,000,000 fraud I had been involved in. Then when partway through
that secret pact with Scotland Yard‘s SFO, their go-between police officer admitted to me; ‗..they [the
Police] could pretend they‘ve found some one‘s fingerprints on something, or even plant them onto an
object the suspect has never even touched before‘. Little did the policeman, whom was telling me this
incredibly explosive confession, realise I had a hidden microphone taped to my chest, and that our
conversation was being recorded via a reel to reel tape recorder by some bloke [connected to me], sitting in
a van only yards from where we were positioned on a bench in Finsbury Park, North London, in 1987.
Had I not had this powerful evidence to produce to my solicitors, whom then in turn confirmed to the
police the contents of the tape, and that a series of high profile IRA trial‘s and appeals were also taking
place around the same period of time, though unbelievably not to my knowledge, and in fact it didn‘t even
occur to me, until I started writing this book, that, that was the case and how significant my taped
recording was to the trials of the; Birmingham Six, the Guilford Four, the Maguire Seven and Danny
McNamee‘s case, when in 1987 he was sentenced to 25 years for the Hyde Park bombing, despite
McNamee pleading that he was innocent. In 1998, shortly after his release under the ―Good Friday
Agreement‖, a judge overturned his conviction, deeming it unsafe because of withheld fingerprint evidence
that implicated other bomb-makers. In the case of the Birmingham Six, the Court of Appeal stated about
the forensic evidence that: ―Dr Skuse‘s conclusion was wrong, and demonstrably wrong, judged even by
the state of forensic science in 1974‖. Then, the Guildford Four: Lord Chief Justice, Lord Lane, said that
the police had; ―completely fabricated the typed notes, amending them to make them look more effective,
and then creating hand-written notes to give the appearance of contemporaneous notes...‖ And the
convictions of the Maguire Seven were quashed in 1991. The court held that members of the London
Metropolitan Police beat some of the seven into confessing to the crimes and withheld information that
would have cleared them.
If it wasn‘t for my secretly taped recorded evidence, I would‘ve no doubt been sentenced to
imprisonment for a minimum of 6 to 8 years and most probably more. My case was deemed ―not in the
public‘s interest‖, the case was held privately in-camera in the back room of a Judge‘s Chambers. I had to
- 4 -