07.06.2013 Views

Country Report - Zawya

Country Report - Zawya

Country Report - Zawya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Libya<br />

August 2010<br />

Economist Intelligence Unit<br />

26 Red Lion Square<br />

London WC1R 4HQ<br />

United Kingdom


Economist Intelligence Unit<br />

The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing<br />

operations across national borders. For 60 years it has been a source of information on business developments,<br />

economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide.<br />

The Economist Intelligence Unit delivers its information in four ways: through its digital portfolio, where the<br />

latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual<br />

reference works; through research reports; and by organising seminars and presentations. The firm is a<br />

member of The Economist Group.<br />

London<br />

Economist Intelligence Unit<br />

26 Red Lion Square<br />

London<br />

WC1R 4HQ<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Tel: (44.20) 7576 8000<br />

Fax: (44.20) 7576 8500<br />

E-mail: london@eiu.com<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Economist Intelligence Unit<br />

60/F, Central Plaza<br />

18 Harbour Road<br />

Wanchai<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Tel: (852) 2585 3888<br />

Fax: (852) 2802 7638<br />

E-mail: hongkong@eiu.com<br />

New York<br />

Economist Intelligence Unit<br />

The Economist Group<br />

750 Third Avenue<br />

5th Floor<br />

New York, NY 10017, US<br />

Tel: (1.212) 554 0600<br />

Fax: (1.212) 586 0248<br />

E-mail: newyork@eiu.com<br />

Geneva<br />

Economist Intelligence Unit<br />

Boulevard des Tranchées 16<br />

1206 Geneva<br />

Switzerland<br />

Tel: (41) 22 566 2470<br />

Fax: (41) 22 346 93 47<br />

E-mail: geneva@eiu.com<br />

This report can be accessed electronically as soon as it is published by visiting store.eiu.com or by contacting a<br />

local sales representative.<br />

The whole report may be viewed in PDF format, or can be navigated section-by-section by using the HTML links.<br />

In addition, the full archive of previous reports can be accessed in HTML or PDF format, and our search engine<br />

can be used to find content of interest quickly. Our automatic alerting service will send a notification via email<br />

when new reports become available.<br />

Copyright<br />

© 2010 The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited. All rights reserved. Neither this publication nor<br />

any part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means,<br />

electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission<br />

of The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited.<br />

All information in this report is verified to the best of the author's and the publisher's ability. However, the<br />

Economist Intelligence Unit does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from reliance on it.<br />

ISSN 0269-4328<br />

Symbols for tables<br />

“0 or 0.0” means nil or negligible; “n/a” means not available; “–” means not applicable<br />

Printed and distributed by IntypeLibra, Units 3/4, Elm Grove Industrial Estate, Wimbledon, SW19 4HE.


Libya 1<br />

Libya<br />

Executive summary<br />

3 Highlights<br />

Outlook for 2010-11<br />

4 Political outlook<br />

5 Economic policy outlook<br />

7 Economic forecast<br />

Monthly review: August 2010<br />

10 The political scene<br />

12 Economic policy<br />

15 Economic performance<br />

Data and charts<br />

18 Annual data and forecast<br />

19 Quarterly data<br />

20 Monthly data<br />

21 Annual trends charts<br />

22 Monthly trends charts<br />

23 Comparative economic indicators<br />

<strong>Country</strong> snapshot<br />

24 Basic data<br />

25 Political structure<br />

Editors: Rory Fyfe (editor); David Butter (consulting editor)<br />

Editorial closing date: August 12th 2010<br />

All queries: Tel: (44.20) 7576 8000 E-mail: london@eiu.com<br />

Next report: To request the latest schedule, e-mail schedule@eiu.com<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


2 Libya<br />

MEDITERRANEAN SEA<br />

TUNISIA<br />

Shahhat<br />

Dernah<br />

Al Bayda a<br />

Al Marj arj<br />

Al Bardi<br />

Tobruq<br />

Benghazi<br />

Gulf of Sirte<br />

TRIPOLI<br />

Zuwara ara<br />

Azzawiya Azzawiya<br />

Khums<br />

Zlitan<br />

Al-Aziziyah<br />

Al Aziziyah<br />

Gharyan<br />

Misurata<br />

Yefren<br />

Bani Walid<br />

Nalut ut<br />

Qaminis<br />

Ajdabiya<br />

Sirte<br />

Marsa Marsa al-Brega<br />

al-Brega<br />

Sidra<br />

Ghadames<br />

Al Jaghbub<br />

Jalu<br />

Raqubah<br />

Waddan<br />

Zillah<br />

ALGERIA<br />

LIBYA<br />

Birak<br />

EGYPT<br />

Sebha<br />

Awbari Awbari<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010<br />

Murzuq<br />

Al Qatrun<br />

Ghat<br />

Kufra<br />

Sahara Desert<br />

Main road<br />

International boundary<br />

Sahara Desert<br />

Main airport<br />

Capital<br />

NIGER<br />

Major town<br />

Other town<br />

SUDAN<br />

CHAD<br />

0 km 100 200 300 400<br />

0 miles 100 200<br />

© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 3<br />

Outlook for 2010-11<br />

Monthly review<br />

Executive summary<br />

Highlights<br />

August 2010<br />

• Political power will remain vested in the Libyan leader, Muammar Qadhafi.<br />

Libya will retain its unique jamahiriya (republic of the people) system, but the<br />

structures of government will undergo halting reform.<br />

• Colonel Qadhafi's most likely successor is his son, Saif al-Islam Qadhafi, a<br />

reformer who has been put forward as the general co-ordinator of the Popular<br />

Social Command with powers over parliament and the executive.<br />

• Relations with the US and EU will be subject to periodic bouts of tension,<br />

despite the resolution of the Lockerbie affair and the scrapping of Libya's<br />

weapons of mass destruction programme.<br />

• The hydrocarbons sector will dominate the economy, but non-oil growth will<br />

be strong. However, the government's inconsistent and unwelcoming policies<br />

risk deterring international oil companies and other investors.<br />

• We forecast that real GDP growth will average 3.6% in 2010-11. Oil output is<br />

likely to rise modestly alongside strong non-oil-sector growth.<br />

• We have revised up our forecasts for inflation to an average of 3.9% in 2010-11<br />

owing to likely rises in international food prices following the Russian<br />

decision to ban grain exports.<br />

• The current account will record a surplus of 21.7% of GDP in 2010 and 21.3% in<br />

2011 as higher average annual oil prices help to boost exports.<br />

• A US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing into the release of<br />

Abdelbaset al-Megrahi has been postponed. It had been poised to investigate<br />

whether BP had lobbied for Mr Megrahi's release.<br />

• A South Korean diplomat has been deported for spying and trying to collect<br />

information on Colonel Qadhafi and his family.<br />

• Government figures have been released showing a higher than expected<br />

budget surplus owing to a failure to meet capital spending targets.<br />

• UniCredit has won a foreign banking licence, but the Central Bank has<br />

dropped plans to issue a second licence. Meanwhile, the Libyan Investment<br />

Authority has expanded its stake in UniCredit.<br />

• Poor families have benefited from the Wealth Distribution Programme that<br />

aimed to distribute oil revenue directly to the people.<br />

• Inflation has picked up owing to higher food and clothing prices.<br />

• The current-account surplus narrowed sharply in 2009, as expected, in line<br />

with lower oil export revenue, and FDI inflows have declined.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


4 Libya<br />

Domestic politics<br />

Outlook for 2010-11<br />

Political outlook<br />

The Libyan leader, Muammar Qadhafi, has ruthlessly repressed political<br />

dissent, and there are now few real domestic threats to his rule. He has now<br />

been in power for over 40 years. Colonel Qadhafi is likely to withdraw slowly<br />

from domestic politics, investing more time in symbolic roles, such as the "king<br />

of kings of Africa". There is no agreed process in place for the transfer of power,<br />

but the proposed appointment of Colonel Qadhafi's second-eldest son, Saif<br />

al-Islam Qadhafi, as general co-ordinator of the Popular Social Command in<br />

October 2009 has made him the most likely successor, and would give him<br />

powers equivalent to those of head of state, with control over parliament and<br />

the executive. Although the appointment has not been confirmed, the fact that<br />

Saif Qadhafi was put forward by his father strengthens his position and<br />

suggests that he has been given a mandate to implement his economic and<br />

political reform programme—he has long been in favour of creating a formal<br />

constitution and of implementing administrative reform. Other possible<br />

successors include one of Colonel Qadhafi's other six children, or someone<br />

may emerge from within the political elite. However, the succession is unlikely<br />

to become a pressing issue while Colonel Qadhafi retains power, which he is<br />

expected to do throughout the forecast period.<br />

Significant political reform is unlikely. Colonel Qadhafi remains wedded to<br />

Libya's opaque and ineffective jamahiriya (republic of the people) system and<br />

continues to manipulate its structure to maintain the illusion of democracy—as<br />

demonstrated in early 2009 by the apparent rejection by the local-level Basic<br />

People's Congresses and the General People's Congress (akin to a national<br />

parliament) of the Wealth Distribution Programme (WDP). The Libyan leader<br />

will continue to deny any individual minister the opportunity to build up a<br />

personal power base. Saif Qadhafi's proposed appointment could in part be<br />

intended to counterbalance conservative and vested interests within the regime.<br />

There is at present little immediate threat to the ruling elite. However, if the<br />

socioeconomic environment were to deteriorate through, for example, rising<br />

unemployment, collapsing oil prices or growing inequality, the government<br />

could be faced with increased unrest. Feelings of political exclusion have been<br />

exacerbated by the eradication of Libya's privately owned media, which were<br />

nationalised in June 2009. However, with the economy expected to remain<br />

relatively strong and the opposition, with the exception of domestic Islamists,<br />

either in exile or lacking clout and coherence, the prospect of any threat to the<br />

regime appears limited.<br />

The greatest fear for the authorities remains the potential challenge from homegrown<br />

Islamist militant groups, in light of regionwide concerns over the threat<br />

posed by al-Qaida affiliates and past Islamist-inspired assassination attempts<br />

against Colonel Qadhafi. Reconciliation and rehabilitation negotiations<br />

have proceeded secretly, and 214 Islamists, including 34 from the Libyan<br />

Islamic Fighting Group—the largest local militant organisation, which recently<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 5<br />

International relations<br />

Policy trends<br />

renounced violence—were released from prison in March. This suggests that the<br />

local Islamist militant threat is declining.<br />

The Libyan government is likely to remain embroiled in unpleasant<br />

disagreements with various countries, although the majority of these will have<br />

no serious consequences. A dispute with Switzerland seriously damaged<br />

commercial and diplomatic relations after a son of Colonel Qadhafi was<br />

arrested in Geneva in 2008 for allegedly mistreating a maid. The disagreement,<br />

which has now been resolved, assumed international proportions when the<br />

Libyan government briefly suspended visas for citizens of EU countries within<br />

the Schengen visa area. Libya's past involvement in terrorist activities will<br />

continue to resurface, souring international relations. The case of a British oil<br />

major, BP, which has recently been accused by US senators of lobbying for the<br />

release of the man convicted of the 1988 bombing of a plane over Lockerbie,<br />

Scotland, is an example. Nonetheless, Colonel Qadhafi will continue to seek to<br />

strengthen ties with the US and the EU, particularly Italy, while sporadically<br />

voicing anti-Western rhetoric and engaging with countries viewed as rivals of<br />

the US, such as Russia.<br />

Efforts to integrate Libya into the international community will continue and<br />

the country was recently elected to the UN's Human Rights Council. Generally,<br />

economic imperatives, mainly in the oil and gas sectors, are likely to dictate<br />

relations with the West. Libya will also continue to have tense relations with<br />

other Arab states. A number of major regional leaders failed to attend the<br />

annual meeting of the League of Arab States in Libya at the end of March. Poor<br />

Arab relations have encouraged Libya to focus on ambitions to lead Africa<br />

towards continental unity. The growing wealth of the Libyan Investment<br />

Authority, a sovereign wealth fund, and its increasingly strategic objectives will<br />

help to increase Libya's international clout, particularly in Africa, which will be<br />

a focus for investment.<br />

Economic policy outlook<br />

Economic reform has been limited and is likely to remain so, despite recent<br />

proposals to liberalise the economy and privatise state companies. Even if Saif<br />

Qadhafi is elevated to a high political position, it will take considerable time for<br />

him to establish himself and to implement his vision for economic development.<br />

Any reform will face stiff resistance from vested interests, as some regime<br />

insiders are reluctant to relax their control over large swathes of the statedominated<br />

economy—which has slowed progress on increasing private-sector<br />

and foreign-investor participation.<br />

However, there have been some privatisations and reforms. Large public stakes<br />

in the banking sector have been sold off, with more to follow, and a new<br />

preliminary banking licence has been issued to UniCredit (Italy). However, this<br />

was instead of the two licences initially proposed, illustrating a lack of<br />

transparency in the process. Nonetheless, in conjunction with technical<br />

assistance from international organisations, this will help to modernise the<br />

sector. Bank lending to the private sector has increased significantly since 2007<br />

and is set to continue expanding, which will help the small private sector to<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


6 Libya<br />

Fiscal policy<br />

Monetary policy<br />

grow. The partial privatisation of two telecommunications companies and an<br />

iron and steel firm has been proposed. An initial public offering for shares in<br />

the latter was reported in August to be going ahead. The government is also<br />

committed to streamlining the bureaucracy, but little action has been taken. Ten<br />

new laws have been introduced in 2010 to improve the business and<br />

investment environment, but are still awaiting executive regulations to clarify<br />

how they will be implemented.<br />

The whims of Colonel Qadhafi will continue to create uncertainty in<br />

policymaking. This will deter investors, who are unlikely to be assuaged by a<br />

proposed new hydrocarbons law. During 2009-10 the government suspended<br />

visas for EU citizens living within the Schengen visa area and hinted that it<br />

might nationalise the hydrocarbons sector. Despite the award of dozens of<br />

exploration permits, drilling success has been limited, and when exploration<br />

has been successful development of the discoveries has been impeded. This has<br />

dented the positive perceptions of investing in Libya's hydrocarbons sector and<br />

its entire economy more generally. Foreign investment, which is vital for<br />

development, is therefore likely to become harder and more expensive for Libya<br />

to obtain, and more major foreign oil companies may leave—particularly as a<br />

number of exploration permits lapse this year. BP has confirmed its intention to<br />

proceed with its own major exploration programme, although its deepwater<br />

exploration programme has been delayed, possibly as a consequence of safety<br />

concerns related to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.<br />

The government has had a healthy budget surplus in recent years owing to high<br />

oil revenue and a tendency to fall short of spending commitments. The fiscal<br />

surplus shrunk in 2009 to 4.6% of GDP owing to lower average oil prices and<br />

revenue. The government expects to increase expenditure by 32% in 2010.<br />

Although current expenditure will increase, as efforts to cut the size of the civil<br />

service have been postponed, a public-sector pay rise is planned and subsidies<br />

will be kept in place to control consumer prices, capital expenditure is likely to<br />

fall short of targets. Combined with higher oil prices this will lead to an increase<br />

in the budget surplus in 2010 to 5.9% of GDP. In 2011 cutbacks in capital<br />

expenditure to meet existing government plans and spending restraint owing to<br />

lower international oil prices will lead to a further increase in the budget<br />

surplus to 10.2% of GDP. Lower than expected government expenditure in 2009<br />

has led us to revise up our estimates and forecasts for the fiscal balance.<br />

The currency is pegged to the IMF's special drawing rights (SDR), which<br />

restricts monetary policy flexibility. Nonetheless, the Central Bank of Libya<br />

cut benchmark interest rates by 2 percentage points in early 2009 and<br />

increased them back to 5% in early 2010. Pressure on the Central Bank to<br />

overhaul its approach to monetary policy and regulation of financial services is<br />

likely to increase as the banking sector is liberalised. Liquidity is excessive,<br />

and state-subsidised credit institutions are currently crowding out commercial<br />

bank lending. Efforts will be made to address these issues.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 7<br />

International assumptions<br />

Economic growth<br />

Economic forecast<br />

International assumptions summary<br />

(% unless otherwise indicated)<br />

2008 2009 2010 2011<br />

Real GDP growth<br />

World 2.8 -0.7 4.2 3.6<br />

OECD 0.6 -3.3 2.5 1.7<br />

EU27<br />

Exchange rates<br />

0.9 -4.2 0.8 1.1<br />

US$ effective (2000=100) 92.5 97.0 97.7 100.9<br />

US$:€ 1.470 1.393 1.258 1.193<br />

¥:US$<br />

Financial indicators<br />

103.4 93.7 92.6 93.0<br />

US$ 3-month commercial paper rate 2.18 0.26 0.22 0.35<br />

€ 3-month interbank rate<br />

Commodity prices<br />

4.65 1.23 0.77 0.88<br />

Oil (Brent; US$/b) 97.7 61.9 80.0 78.5<br />

Gold (US$/troy oz)<br />

Food, feedstuffs & beverages<br />

871.8 973.0 1,187.3 1,242.5<br />

(% change in US$ terms) 28.3 -20.4 -3.4 0.0<br />

Industrial raw materials (% change in US$ terms) -5.1 -25.6 33.7 5.1<br />

Note. Regional GDP growth rates weighted using purchasing power parity exchange rates.<br />

The Economist Intelligence Unit forecasts that world real GDP growth (at<br />

purchasing power parity exchange rates) will be 4.2% in 2010, declining to 3.6%<br />

in 2011, as the effect of government stimulus packages fades. Growth in the<br />

euro area, the main market for Libyan exports is only forecast to average 0.8%.<br />

The benchmark dated Brent Blend is forecast to rise to US$80/barrel in 2010 but<br />

to fall back to US$78.5/b in 2011.<br />

Libyan real GDP contracted by 0.7% in 2009, which was well below potential<br />

and suggests that growth is being limited by structural constraints, such as the<br />

inefficiency of the bureaucracy. We therefore forecast that real GDP growth will<br />

be relatively weak in 2010-11 at an average of 3.6%. The Libyan economy will<br />

continue to be dependent on the hydrocarbons sector for future expansion and<br />

growth will be further limited by minimal increases in crude oil production.<br />

Development work and new oil exploration will move forward slowly in an<br />

attempt to boost production capacity, although export volumes will grow<br />

slowly in the short term owing to sluggish demand and OPEC production<br />

quotas. Investment and imports related to oil and gas developments will<br />

therefore grow to some extent in 2010-11, provided that international oil<br />

companies are not significantly deterred by the recent threats to nationalise<br />

foreign oil operations or by subsequent regulations that aim to give the Libyan<br />

government greater control over the development of the country's<br />

hydrocarbons assets.<br />

There is potential for rapid growth in the non-oil sector, albeit from a low base,<br />

supported by government infrastructure investment programmes, particularly<br />

in the construction, utilities and transport sectors. There is strong foreign<br />

interest in Libyan investment opportunities, and although reform tends to be<br />

slow and unpredictable, the government appears committed to encouraging<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


8 Libya<br />

Inflation<br />

Exchange rates<br />

External sector<br />

private-sector participation. Moves to raise the proportion of locals in the<br />

workforce could stimulate greater private consumption, and strong growth in<br />

bank lending to the private sector could help to kick-start private-sector<br />

economic activity. However, these factors are not yet having a major impact on<br />

overall economic growth.<br />

After years of negative or low inflation, consumer prices picked up sharply in<br />

2007-08 but fell again in 2009, mainly because of lower international food<br />

prices—food is the dominant component of consumer price inflation. Inflation<br />

is forecast to pick up to an annual average of 3.9% in 2010-11, as consumer<br />

confidence returns and higher oil revenue increases domestic liquidity, but it<br />

will not reach the highs of 2008, as the government maintains subsidies and<br />

increases in international food prices are less dramatic. We have revised up our<br />

forecast for inflation as poor grain harvests around the world, particularly in<br />

Russia, are likely to lead to higher international food prices than previously<br />

expected. A stronger euro against the Libyan dinar could also add to<br />

inflationary pressure in 2010-11.<br />

The dinar is pegged to the SDR and is managed through tight official controls.<br />

The country's huge stocks of foreign reserves—US$97bn in March 2010—mean<br />

that the authorities will be able to defend the exchange-rate regime should any<br />

pressure on the currency arise over the forecast period. We expect the SDR to<br />

depreciate against the US dollar in 2010-11, mainly owing to a depreciation of<br />

the euro, which is a component of the SDR. The dinar is therefore forecast to<br />

depreciate to an average of LD1.28:US$1 in 2010 and LD1.33:US$1 in 2011.<br />

The current account is dominated by hydrocarbons exports. Earnings from<br />

goods exports are expected to grow to an average of US$47bn in 2010-11, from<br />

US$37bn in 2009, owing to higher oil prices and production increases. Goods<br />

imports will rise to an annual average of US$25bn in 2010-11, lifted by demand<br />

for inputs for government development projects. Consequently, we forecast that<br />

the trade surplus will average US$22bn in 2010-11.<br />

The most important element of the services account is oil-sector payments<br />

abroad, which are expected to stagnate in line with development of the sector.<br />

We therefore expect the services deficit to remain steady at an average of<br />

US$4.4bn in 2010-11. The income surplus is forecast to increase owing to growth<br />

in dividends from Libya's rapidly expanding investments abroad and low<br />

growth in profit repatriation by foreign oil companies. The current-account<br />

surplus is therefore expected to widen to an average of US$17bn (22% of GDP)<br />

in 2010-11.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 9<br />

Forecast summary<br />

(% unless otherwise indicated)<br />

2008 a 2009 a 2010b 2011b<br />

Real GDP growth 2.7 -0.7 3.3 4.0<br />

Oil production ('000 b/d) 1,721 1,550 1,567 1,620<br />

Oil exports (US$ bn) 60.7 35.8 44.7 45.6<br />

Consumer price inflation (av) 10.4 2.4 3.2 4.6<br />

Consumer price inflation (year-end) 9.8 0.4 5.3 4.7<br />

Deposit rate 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.0<br />

Government balance (% of GDP) 23.7 4.6 5.9 10.2<br />

Exports of goods fob (US$ bn) 62.0 37.2 46.1 47.1<br />

Imports of goods fob (US$ bn) 21.7 22.0 24.1 25.0<br />

Current-account balance (US$ bn) 35.7 10.1 17.2 17.4<br />

Current-account balance (% of GDP) 37.5 14.6 21.7 21.3<br />

External debt (year-end; US$ bn) 5.6 c 5.9 c 6.3 6.7<br />

Exchange rate LD:US$ (av) 1.22 1.25 1.28 1.33<br />

Exchange rate LD:€ (av) 1.80 1.75 1.61 1.58<br />

Exchange rate LD:¥100 (av) 1.18 1.34 1.38 1.43<br />

Exchange rate LD:SDR (av) 1.94 1.94 1.90 1.93<br />

a Actual. b Economist Intelligence Unit forecasts. c Economist Intelligence Unit estimates.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


10 Libya<br />

BP is embroiled in accusations<br />

over the release of Mr Megrahi<br />

Monthly review: August 2010<br />

The political scene<br />

A US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing into the release of<br />

Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the only man convicted of the bombing of passenger<br />

airline over Lockerbie in 1988, from a Scottish jail in August last year, due to be<br />

held on July 29th, was indefinitely postponed after all the witnesses it<br />

requested to appear declined the invitation. A committee member and<br />

Democratic senator, Robert Menendez, had called on the former British justice<br />

secretary, Jack Straw, the Scottish justice minister, Kenny MacAskill, and the<br />

former BP chief executive, Tony Hayward, to testify at the hearing. But as the<br />

committee has no jurisdiction over non-US nationals, all declined to attend.<br />

The hearing sought to examine the interplay between the British and Scottish<br />

governments and about the communications between the British government<br />

and BP in this matter. They have made clear that they hoped the process could<br />

result in Mr Megrahi being sent back to jail and in BP being prevented from<br />

proceeding with its contract to invest US$900m in oil and gas exploration in<br />

Libya. They have also urged the British government to launch a formal inquiry<br />

and to investigate in particular a letter sent in July 2009 by Lord Trefgarne, the<br />

head of the Libyan British Business Council—of which BP is a member—<br />

stressing to Mr MacAskill that there would be serious implications for UK-<br />

Libyan relations if Mr Megrahi were to die in prison. Lord Trefgarne said last<br />

year that there would be benefits to UK businesses from the release of<br />

Mr Megrahi.<br />

US Senators have suggested that Lord Trefgarne's letter may have facilitated BP's<br />

operations in the Libyan market. According to another senator, Kirsten<br />

Gillibrand, the committee has seen "an abundance of circumstantial evidence<br />

that the British and Scottish governments may have circumvented justice and<br />

organized his release in order to secure a lucrative oil drilling concession for BP".<br />

BP has denied direct involvement in Mr Megrahi's release, although admits it<br />

lobbied the UK government over the signing of a prisoner transfer agreement<br />

(PTA) with Libya in 2007, arguing that delays in the PTA would have a "negative<br />

impact on UK commercial interests". It is also important to point out that BP's<br />

drilling concessions remain far from proven to be lucrative. Instead they are a<br />

major commitment and investment in Libya with no certainty of returns, which<br />

undermines the argument that BP would have needed to secure the release of<br />

Mr Megrahi. However, it is plausible that the Libyan authorities could have<br />

made it easier for BP to operate in the country by, for example, removing<br />

obstacles to importing equipment, on the basis that the company had helped to<br />

secure the release of Mr Megrahi. Similar allegations were made at the time of<br />

Mr Megrahi's release.<br />

In support of BP, the Scottish Executive denied having any contact with BP, and<br />

the British foreign secretary, William Hague, stated in a letter to John Kerry,<br />

chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, that there was no<br />

evidence to support the allegations being made that BP and the Scottish<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 11<br />

South Korean diplomat<br />

is deported<br />

Executive had colluded on the release of Mr Megrahi. Nevertheless, the US<br />

senators, Mr Menendez and Ms Gillibrand called on BP to suspend its drilling<br />

plans in Libya until an investigation takes place. Possibly in response to this<br />

request, BP announced on August 11th that it had delayed its plans for the<br />

offshore Libyan drilling, which would not begin until later this year. Previously,<br />

BP and the National Oil Corporation (NOC)—Libya's state-owned oil company—<br />

had confirmed that a rig was in place to start drilling the first offshore well.<br />

Onshore drilling is set to commence later this year.<br />

Offshore drilling had been supposed to begin in July, although separate<br />

concerns over the environmental impact have delayed operations, since the<br />

offshore drilling is in deep water and sensitivities are running high after the oil<br />

spill in the Gulf of Mexico. BP's announcement of delays to offshore drilling<br />

might have been aimed at soothing these sensitivities. Shokri Ghanem, head of<br />

the NOC, has said that he retains full confidence in BP. However, there is<br />

domestic support for resource nationalism, and many Libyans have been less<br />

forgiving of BP. These elements have taken the opportunity to fight for the<br />

expulsion of BP from Libya and have launched a campaign on the Facebook<br />

social networking website, called "BP Get Out". However, given that Libya has<br />

not lived up to its exploration potential in recent years, the country retains the<br />

need for foreign expertise in deepwater drilling and for the large exploration<br />

commitments that BP has made. Final judgement on the company will come<br />

once a full investigation has been made into the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.<br />

The fact that the interest of US legislators in the Lockerbie case has been revived<br />

in the aftermath of the oil spill suggests that the senators may be preoccupied<br />

with trying to find another stick with which to beat BP. However, it also arises<br />

from the resentment at the circumstances of Mr Megrahi's release from prison<br />

and from lingering doubts about the Lockerbie verdict itself. More broadly, it<br />

provides a reminder that major dealings with the Libyan government risk<br />

becoming embroiled in the country's murky past.<br />

It came to light in late July that the Libyan authorities had expelled a South<br />

Korean diplomat for spying, or more specifically, trying to collect information<br />

on the Libyan leader, Muammar Qadhafi, and his family. According to South<br />

Korean news sources, the diplomat had been followed for three months before<br />

his arrest. The strain that this placed on relations between the two countries<br />

was immediately evident when South Korean officials questioned the Libyan<br />

authorities' actions after they reportedly started following numerous other<br />

South Koreans working in Libya. In response, Libya withdrew its entire staff<br />

from its Economic Co-operation Bureau in the South Korean capital, Seoul.<br />

According to subsequent uncorroborated reports, Libya then demanded US$1bn<br />

in compensation for South Korea's espionage activities, which Libya wanted to<br />

be paid through construction works. It was unclear whether a power plant<br />

project deal, announced in early August, was related to Libya's compensation<br />

claims. Daewoo, a South Korean construction firm, has said that it secured a<br />

contract to build a 750-mw power plant in Zuweitina, south-west of Benghazi,<br />

for US$438m. The contract has taken over 10 years to negotiate. A Daewoo<br />

spokesman told the press that "a diplomatic row is one thing and business is<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


12 Libya<br />

Spending constraints lead to<br />

larger budget surplus<br />

NOC claims large rise<br />

in reserves<br />

another". South Korean companies have heavily invested in Libya and have<br />

carried out a huge amount of construction work for a number of years. It is<br />

therefore important for them to establish Libya's probable policy direction and<br />

who is likely to succeed Colonel Qadhafi.<br />

Economic policy<br />

The government has released provisional budget data for 2009, which show<br />

that expenditure was lower than expected. Administrative expenditure fell by<br />

10% from 2008 to LD14bn (US$11bn), and development expenditure fell by 39%<br />

to LD18bn. However, a new category of "other expenditure" was included,<br />

which totalled LD8.9bn. Assuming previously announced government capital<br />

expenditure plans are correct, this should be included as part of capital<br />

expenditure, which, in this case would total LD27bn.<br />

Meanwhile, revenue was broadly in line with expectations. Oil revenue fell by<br />

45% from 2008 to LD35bn, which was 80% of total revenue, down from 88% in<br />

2008. These developments were a consequence of lower average oil prices.<br />

Non-oil revenue increased by 7.9% to LD9bn as a result of a higher tax take. The<br />

increase was primarily due to an increase of LD651m (US$509m) in customs tax<br />

revenue. Although the government has tended to cut tariffs in recent years, an<br />

increase in services import tax from 4% to 10% and also increases in<br />

consumption taxes on imported products in 2009 are probably responsible for<br />

this. In total, the budget was LD4bn, or 4.6% of GDP, in surplus, considerably<br />

lower than the LD28bn (24% of GDP) in 2008 as a result of lower oil revenue.<br />

80,000<br />

70,000<br />

60,000<br />

50,000<br />

40,000<br />

30,000<br />

20,000<br />

10,000<br />

0<br />

Public finances<br />

(LD m)<br />

Budget revenue<br />

2005<br />

06<br />

Budget expenditure<br />

Sources: Central Bank of Libya; Economist Intelligence Unit forecasts.<br />

Budget balance<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010<br />

07<br />

According to the head of the NOC, Mr Ghanem, oil companies met with<br />

considerable success during 2009 and the first half of 2010 in their<br />

hydrocarbons exploration efforts. Mr Ghanem claimed in early August that of<br />

the 65 new wells drilled last year, the NOC, in concert with international oil<br />

companies (IOCs), found recoverable reserves of either oil or gas in 51% of<br />

them. As a result, the country's oil reserves rose by 653m barrels, which was<br />

more than total production in 2009 of around 566m barrels. Mr Ghanem also<br />

claimed that gas reserves had increased by 782bn cu ft. Libya's exploration<br />

programme has seemingly had even greater success over the first six months of<br />

08<br />

09<br />

10<br />

11


Libya 13<br />

this year with an additional 612m barrels of oil and more than 1trn cu ft of gas<br />

having been found. Based on statistics from BP, proven reserves at the end of<br />

2009 were 44bn barrels of oil (3.3% of total world reserves) and 54trn cu ft of<br />

gas (0.8% of total world reserves).<br />

Mr Ghanem also claimed that recent drilling operations had indicated an<br />

additional 20 potential oil wells and he expected reserves to be further boosted<br />

by the end of this year. Particularly since the drilling activity in the first half of<br />

2010 only represented 40% of this year's total programme.<br />

Companies that have made discoveries include the predominantly US-owned<br />

Oasis Consortium; Agoco (Libya); TPIC (Turkey); Tatneft (Russia); Medco Energi<br />

Internasional (Indonesia); Sirte Oil Company (Libya); Zueitina Oil Company, an<br />

international consortium including Occidental (US), OMV (Austria) and the<br />

NOC; and Sonatrach (Algeria).<br />

Until these additional reserves are confirmed by a globally recognised<br />

independent energy organisation, there will remain doubts over their veracity.<br />

Libya has good reason to talk up its reserves; in recent months a number of<br />

international oil companies have either relinquished their concessions, or<br />

hinted that they would do so, on account of growing concern over a lack of<br />

exploration success, the NOC's hard bargaining and the threat that awkward<br />

political demands may be made of operators in the sector.<br />

In focus<br />

UniCredit awarded banking licence after LIA increases its stake in the bank<br />

On August 9th the Central Bank of Libya announced that UniCredit, an Italian bank,<br />

had won preliminary approval to open a joint venture in Libya. The bank will be<br />

permitted a maximum stake of 49% in the local company, although it will receive full<br />

management control. The Central Bank had originally stated that it would award two<br />

new foreign banking licences, but it said that it had decided to only issue one, citing<br />

changes in the global financial environment. This decision will come as a<br />

disappointment to HSBC, the UK-based bank that was thought to be almost certain<br />

to win one of the licences, especially after a senior Libyan official said in July that he<br />

was 99% sure that HSBC would be awarded a licence (July 2010, Economic policy).<br />

The recent furore surrounding the case of BP, a British oil major, and the release of<br />

the man convicted of the bombing of a plane over Lockerbie in 1988, Abdelbaset<br />

al-Megrahi, may have put the Libyan leadership off more involvement with major<br />

British companies. Alternatively, HSBC could have determined that it would be<br />

better not to announce any involvement in Libya until the release of Mr Megrahi is<br />

receiving less media attention. Neither HSBC nor the Central Bank has commented<br />

on why the UK-based bank was not successful.<br />

There were also three gulf banks in the running for the licences—Mashreq Bank<br />

(UAE), Emirates NBD (UAE) and Qatar Islamic Bank—and these banks have also been<br />

rejected. It could be the case that the authorities are extremely cautious owing to<br />

concerns about exposing the local banking sector to foreign competition. The local<br />

banking sector is undeveloped with a lack of infrastructure, poor service quality and<br />

backward business models. If this is the real reason behind the withdrawal of the<br />

second banking licence, it might also take some time before the preliminary approval<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


14 Libya<br />

Poor families benefit from oil<br />

wealth redistribution<br />

that UniCredit has received is translated into the actual establishment of a joint<br />

venture.<br />

Earlier in August it was announced that the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA), a<br />

sovereign wealth fund, had increased its stake in UniCredit to 2.075% of the bank's<br />

capital. Recent data suggest that the Central Bank already owns around 5% of the<br />

bank, taking the Libyan government's holding to around 7%. The award of the licence<br />

so close to the announcement of the increased stake of the LIA in UniCredit is bound<br />

to attract some criticism and accusations of preferential treatment. This also poses the<br />

possibility that vested interests within the regime could be responsible for derailing<br />

HSBC's bid for the licence. Libyan political machinations are often cast as a battle<br />

between reformers, whom the central bank governor, Farhat Bengdara, is widely<br />

regarded to be among, and a conservative "old guard" that aims to maintain the<br />

status quo. Backroom dealings and power plays between these camps are often used<br />

to explain unusual outcomes or unexpected actions of the Libyan authorities and<br />

may be applicable in this instance.<br />

The LIA, which has around US$65bn at its disposal, is becoming increasingly<br />

acquisitive, taking advantage of the period of low global asset prices. In recent<br />

months, it has acquired holdings in a Russian Aluminium company, RUSAL; in the<br />

world's largest brickmaking firm, Wienerberger of Austria; and in a British media<br />

group, Pearson. It is particularly interested in financial services, not least to gain inhouse<br />

expertise at managing its assets. To this end, it was reported in early August<br />

that it had handed over "a few hundred million dollars" to a newly created asset<br />

manager in London, FM Capital Partners, for it to manage, while at the same time<br />

training up Libyan staff in the field of asset management. The intention is that the<br />

Libyan team will then take hold of the asset portfolio after five years. FM Capital<br />

Partners will make most of its investments in the traditional areas of equities, foreign<br />

exchange, derivatives and commodities. But it will also have a strong focus on Africa,<br />

were about 40% of its investments would be made. Indeed, it is understood that the<br />

Libyan African Investment Portfolio (LAP), a subsidiary of the LIA, put up most of<br />

the funds for the scheme. Africa is a key area of investment for Libya; it already has<br />

significant assets in the sub-Saharan region and at the summit of the Community of<br />

Sahel-Saharan States held in the Chadian capital, N'Djamena, in mid-July, the Libyan<br />

Leader, Colonel Muammar Qadhafi, announced that he was looking to invest<br />

considerably more. He told the audience that "the Libyan Jamahiriya [republic of the<br />

people] has US$90bn waiting for investment markets. The Libya market can absorb<br />

only part of this money. We started by focusing our attention on Africa hoping that it<br />

would absorb these huge sums of money." But he added a caveat, saying that Libya<br />

was looking for markets in the region that had "stability, peace, security, confidence,<br />

real independence, political will and corruption free environment", which provides<br />

additional reasons for not investing in Libya itself.<br />

Local news sources have revealed that Colonel Qadhafi's oil wealth plan, by<br />

which he intended to allocate part of the country's oil revenue directly to poor<br />

families, has benefited 230,815 such families since the scheme's launch in 2006.<br />

According to the report in a Libyan newspaper, Al Jamahiria, 45,912 three-person<br />

households received LD30,000 (US$23,587) each, while 34,362 four-person<br />

households were each allocated LD40,000, and 150,588 households of five or<br />

more people were given LD50,000. In total, the programme has reportedly<br />

distributed funds worth LD10.3bn (US$8.1bn). However, in the government<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 15<br />

Consumer price inflation<br />

(% change, year on year)<br />

budget figures only US$2.7bn was spent on wealth distribution when the<br />

programme was launched, and nothing was spent in 2009.<br />

Economic performance<br />

Year-on-year inflation showed a significant jump at the end of the second<br />

quarter, with the consumer price index rising by 3.4% over the 12 months to<br />

end-June, compared with just 0.2% to end-March. The rise was most marked in<br />

the food and beverages and clothing and footwear categories—the most heavily<br />

weighted items—which increased by 3.9% and 10.5% respectively. Education and<br />

culture and personal services also rose strongly, but their weighting in the<br />

overall basket is limited. The narrow range of movement in housing and<br />

healthcare reflects the raft of subsidies which protect prices in these sectors.<br />

2009 2010<br />

3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr<br />

Food & beverages 0.1 0.1 -0.6 3.9<br />

Clothing & footwear 1.0 6.5 8.0 10.5<br />

Housing -0.3 -0.5 -0.1 0.1<br />

House furniture 4.0 3.4 2.5 2.5<br />

Healthcare -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.0<br />

Transport 0.4 0.1 -0.6 -1.0<br />

Education & culture 4.8 9.5 8.1 7.8<br />

Personal services 1.5 3.3 4.3 5.6<br />

Consumer price inflation -0.6 0.4 0.2 3.4<br />

Source: Central Bank of Libya.<br />

Inflation picks up in<br />

second quarter<br />

The strong rise in the second quarter led to average inflation of 1.9% in the first<br />

six months, compared with 2.4% for the whole of 2009. Much of Libya's<br />

inflation is imported; everyday items such as food and clothing are increasingly<br />

brought in from outside the country and are therefore subject to global market<br />

forces. Higher global commodity prices have exerted upward pressure on<br />

domestic prices, which is likely to persist for the rest of the year, particularly<br />

with seasonal rises in prices during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.<br />

7.0<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

Consumer price inflation<br />

(% change, year on year)<br />

-1.0<br />

Jan<br />

2009<br />

Feb Mar Apr May<br />

Source: Central Bank of Libya.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010<br />

Jun<br />

Jul<br />

Aug<br />

Sep<br />

Oct<br />

Nov<br />

Dec<br />

Jan<br />

10<br />

Feb<br />

Mar<br />

Apr<br />

May<br />

Jun


16 Libya<br />

Current-account surplus<br />

narrows sharply<br />

The impact of the global economic downturn is fully reflected in data recently<br />

released by the Central Bank of Libya showing Libya's external position. With<br />

oil and gas exports constituting some 96.4% of total exports, Libya's trade<br />

surplus was severely dented in 2009, as both global demand and prices<br />

slumped. Total export revenue fell from a record LD76bn (US$59bn) in 2008 to<br />

LD47bn last year; a decline of 39%. Conversely, imports continued to grow.<br />

Since Libya's reintegration into the global community, its demand for foreign<br />

manufactured goods has grown unabated, as the access to global markets has<br />

exposed the country's shortcomings in terms of manufacturing output. It will<br />

take some years for Libya to develop a viable manufacturing base of its own;<br />

until that point, Libya's demand for imported goods will continue to rise. As a<br />

result of the shift in trade flows, Libya's trade surplus narrowed markedly,<br />

declining to LD19bn in 2009, down from LD49bn the previous year.<br />

Rising consumption and demand for foreign manufactures will also take its toll<br />

on Libya's non-merchandise account in the form of services debits. These are<br />

constituted chiefly of import-related services costs—such as insurance and<br />

freight—and so, as Libya's imports continue to rise, so will the ancillary services<br />

payments. Just as Libya's imports have risen by 75% over the past four years, so<br />

its services bill has almost doubled.<br />

Current account<br />

(LD m)<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Exports 51,552 63,181 75,959 46,630<br />

Oil & gas 50,269 61,706 74,182 44,932<br />

Imports -15,674 -22,371 -26,807 -27,623<br />

Trade balance 35,878 40,810 49,152 19,007<br />

Services -2,751 -3,231 -4,672 -5,529<br />

Credits 145 247 273 824<br />

Debits -2,896 -3,478 -4,945 -6,352<br />

Income 1,506 1,838 1,938 1,120<br />

Credits 4,014 5,482 4,885 2,515<br />

Debits -2,508 -3,644 -2,947 -1,395<br />

Current transfers 435 -276 -1,285 -1,971<br />

Credits 1,603 686 -94 -264<br />

Debits -1,167 -962 -1,191 -1,707<br />

Non-merchandise balance -810 -1,669 -4,019 -6,379<br />

Current account balance 35,068 39,140 45,133 12,628<br />

Source: Central Bank of Libya.<br />

The effect of reduced oil export earnings is that oil companies operating in<br />

Libya post reduced profits and so repatriate fewer funds to their home<br />

countries. This is reflected in the income account, which shows a 52% fall in<br />

debits. Income credits, most probably representing interest accrued on Libyan<br />

assets overseas also showed a decline in 2009, as global interest rates fell as the<br />

credit crunch set in. Conversely, current transfers debits—made up mostly of<br />

remittances paid by immigrant workers back to their countries of origin—rose<br />

markedly as Libya's project development programme continued apace, and<br />

continued to attract increasing numbers of expatriate labourers.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 17<br />

FDI declines<br />

As a result, Libya's non-merchandise deficit grew by 60% to record levels of<br />

LD6.4bn (US$5bn). However, with the value of merchandise trade—made up<br />

almost entirely of oil exports—many times greater than non-merchandise trade,<br />

the composition of Libya's current account clearly shows the country's total<br />

dependency on oil to bring in hard currency and support its balance of<br />

payments. Overall, Libya's current-account surplus was cut by almost three<br />

times, falling from LD45.1bn in 2008, to LD12.6bn last year, equivalent to an<br />

estimated 15% of GDP.<br />

According to data from the latest World Investment <strong>Report</strong> from the UN<br />

Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), inward foreign direct<br />

investment (FDI) into Libya in 2009 declined by 35%, from US$4.1bn in 2008, to<br />

US$2.7bn last year. Much of the fall was due to the global economic downturn,<br />

with investment falling globally; in North Africa, total inward investment fell<br />

from US$21.4bn in 2008 to US$14.9bn in 2009.<br />

However, Libya's share of FDI into North Africa has fallen from a high of 21% in<br />

2007, to 18% in 2009, suggesting that there are other factors at play. These are<br />

likely to be concerns amongst the investment community over political risk in<br />

Libya, particularly the highly politicised nature of the business environment.<br />

Incidents such as the spat with Switzerland, temporary bans on EU Schengenarea<br />

visas and threats to nationalise the hydrocarbons sector are likely to have<br />

had a deterrent effect. In addition, the slowdown is likely to reflect the decline<br />

in oil and gas investment over the period; this peaked in 2007, but has since<br />

subsided, possibly as a result of the ever-harder bargain that has been driven by<br />

the NOC, forcing international oil companies to question the competitiveness<br />

of Libya as an investment destination.<br />

Foreign direct investment inflows<br />

(US$ m unless otherwise indicated)<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Algeria 1,081 1,795 1,662 2,646 2,487<br />

Egypt 5,376 10,043 11,578 9,495 6,712<br />

Libya 1,038 2,013 4,689 4,111 2,674<br />

Morocco 1,653 2,450 2,804 2,388 1,331<br />

Tunisia 782 3,312 1,618 2,761 1,688<br />

North Africa 9,931 19,613 22,350 21,400 14,892<br />

Libyan % share in North Africa 10 10 21 19 18<br />

Source: UNCTAD.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


18 Libya<br />

Data and charts<br />

Annual data and forecast<br />

e g c Pl ease se ra phi bel ow<br />

2005a 2006a 2007a 2008a 2009 a 2010b 2011b<br />

GDP<br />

Nominal GDP (US$ m) 50,394 59,925 73,387 95,246 68,837 79,194 81,397<br />

Nominal GDP (LD m) 65,934 78,716 92,661 116,540 86,289 101,203 108,092<br />

Real GDP growth (%)<br />

Expenditure on GDP (% real change)<br />

10.9 5.6 5.0 2.7 -0.7 3.3 4.0<br />

Private consumption 8.9 3.9c 3.8c 4.2c 4.1 c 4.4 4.3<br />

Government consumption 7.7 8.5c 10.5c 13.0c -0.4 c 7.0 3.0<br />

Gross fixed investment 30.5 8.5c 7.5c 13.1c 9.0 c 8.6 8.0<br />

Exports of goods & services 1.6 8.6c 6.3c -7.0c -12.0 c 0.1 2.3<br />

Imports of goods & services<br />

Origin of GDP (% real change)<br />

3.0 8.5c 9.0c 8.2c 4.5 c 8.9 5.2<br />

Agriculture 7.6 9.8 4.0 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.3<br />

Industry 10.0 4.4 3.6 1.1 -4.4 2.7 3.7<br />

Services<br />

Population and income<br />

13.1 7.7 7.9 6.0 5.7 4.6 4.7<br />

Population (m) 5.9 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.7<br />

GDP per head (US$ at PPP)<br />

Fiscal indicators (% of GDP)<br />

13,493 14,304c 16,068c 17,190c 18,186 c 18,697 18,433<br />

Public-sector revenue 56.7 59.8 58.4 62.4 51.4 54.6 57.3<br />

Public-sector expenditure 28.9 27.2 33.5 38.7 46.7 48.6 47.1<br />

Public-sector balance 27.8 32.7 24.9 23.7 4.6 5.9 10.2<br />

Net public debt<br />

Prices and financial indicators<br />

5.9c 4.6c 3.6c 3.0c 3.9 c 3.4 3.3<br />

Exchange rate LD:US$ (end-period) 1.35 1.28 1.22 1.25 1.23 1.29 1.33<br />

Exchange rate LD:€ (end-period) 1.59 1.70 1.79 1.74 1.77 1.54 1.58<br />

Consumer prices (end-period, %) 2.9 1.8 6.3 10.4 2.4 3.2 4.6<br />

Stock of money M1 (% change) 31.8 15.5 42.4 51.4 18.1 35.0 18.0<br />

Stock of money M2 (% change) 29.0 14.1 38.0 49.2 22.4 32.0 16.5<br />

Lending interest rate (av; %) 6.3 6.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 7.0<br />

Deposit interest rate (av; %)<br />

Current account (US$ m)<br />

2.1 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.0<br />

Trade balance 20,184 25,968 29,269 40,292 15,148 22,086 22,116<br />

Goods: exports fob 31,358 39,187 46,970 61,950 37,162 46,145 47,084<br />

Goods: imports fob -11,174 -13,219 -17,701 -21,658 -22,013 -24,059 -24,968<br />

Services balance -1,815 -2,075 -2,556 -4,136 -4,404 -4,402 -4,397<br />

Income balance -281 -595 2,017 586 891 1,057 1,248<br />

Current transfers balance -634 586 -219 -1,040 -1,572 -1,544 -1,604<br />

Current-account balance<br />

External debt (US$ m)<br />

17,454 23,884 28,511 35,702 10,064 17,196 17,363<br />

Debt stock 4,291c 4,456c 4,957c 5,611c 5,891 c 6,326 6,700<br />

Debt service paid 978c 1,095c 1,172c 1,249c 1,327 c 1,607 1,677<br />

Principal repayments 790c 840c 890c 940c 1,015 c 1,290 1,340<br />

Interest<br />

International reserves (US$ m)<br />

188c 255c 282c 309c 312 c 317 337<br />

Total international reserves 39,702 59,483 79,599 92,508 99,220 102,191 109,330<br />

a Actual. b Economist Intelligence Unit forecasts. c Economist Intelligence Unit estimates.<br />

Source: IMF, International Financial Statistics.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 19<br />

Quarterly data<br />

Pl ea se se e g ra phi c bel ow<br />

2008 2009 2010<br />

3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr<br />

Prices<br />

Consumer prices (2003=100) 124.7 126.8 127.7 125.5 125.4 128.2 128.7 129.2<br />

Consumer prices (% change, year on year)<br />

Financial indicators<br />

9.8 8.8 5.8 2.5 0.6 1.1 0.8 3.0<br />

Exchange rate LD:US$ (end-period) 1.24 1.25 1.29 1.24 1.22 1.23 1.27 1.31<br />

Deposit rate (av; %) 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 n/a<br />

Lending rate (av; %) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 n/a<br />

Money market rate (av; %) 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 n/a<br />

M1 (end-period; LD m) 32,796 33,323 31,110 36,473 41,762 39,338 39,212 n/a<br />

M1 (% change, year on year) 70.8 51.4 37.9 22.2 27.3 18.1 26.0 n/a<br />

M2 (end-period; LD m) 37,534 38,653 37,193 42,194 47,018 47,330 47,314 n/a<br />

M2 (% change, year on year)<br />

Sectoral trends<br />

65.8 49.2 39.8 22.9 25.3 22.4 27.2 n/a<br />

Crude oil production (m barrels/day) 1.68 1.72 1.59 1.54 1.55 1.52 1.61 1.62<br />

Crude oil production (% change, year on year)<br />

Foreign trade & reserves (US$ m)<br />

-1.2 -1.1 -9.8 -11.6 -7.7 -11.4 1.4 5.4<br />

Exports fob 18,342 10,775 7,124 8,288 10,003 10,351 n/a n/a<br />

Imports foba -5,709 -4,686 -4,531 -4,968 -5,222 -5,306 n/a n/a<br />

Trade balance 12,633 6,089 2,593 3,320 4,781 5,045 n/a n/a<br />

Reserves excl gold (end–period) 97,605 92,313 91,075 91,663 100,219 99,026 97,117 n/a<br />

a Data do not include defence imports.<br />

Sources: International Energy Agency (IEA), Monthly Oil Market <strong>Report</strong>; IMF, International Financial Statistics, Direction of Trade Statistics.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


20 Libya<br />

Monthly data<br />

Pl ea se se e g ra phi c bel ow<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec<br />

Exchange rate LD:US$ (av)<br />

2008 1.22 1.22 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.22 1.24 1.28 1.30 1.27<br />

2009 1.27 1.30 1.30 1.29 1.27 1.25 1.25 1.24 1.22 1.22 1.21 1.22<br />

2010 1.23 1.26 1.27 1.27 1.30 1.32 1.29 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Exchange rate LD:US$ (end-period)<br />

2008 1.21 1.20 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.19 1.23 1.24 1.30 1.30 1.25<br />

2009 1.28 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.25 1.24 1.24 1.23 1.22 1.22 1.20 1.23<br />

2010 1.24 1.26 1.27 1.28 1.31 1.31 1.28 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Exchange rate LD:€ (end-period)<br />

2008 1.80 1.82 1.86 1.85 1.86 1.86 1.86 1.81 1.75 1.65 1.65 1.75<br />

2009 1.64 1.67 1.71 1.71 1.76 1.75 1.78 1.77 1.78 1.79 1.80 1.77<br />

2010 1.72 1.72 1.72 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

M1 (% change, year on year)<br />

2008 54.4 50.9 46.4 57.7 99.6 81.9 69.6 40.2 70.8 49.9 57.5 51.4<br />

2009 42.7 44.2 37.9 35.0 14.8 22.2 31.4 50.5 27.3 27.8 17.8 18.1<br />

2010 21.0 21.6 26.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

M2 (% change, year on year)<br />

2008 44.2 42.7 40.9 52.9 85.6 71.8 62.6 37.8 65.8 50.0 53.6 49.2<br />

2009 45.7 45.1 39.8 34.3 16.6 22.9 31.8 47.2 25.3 25.6 21.7 22.4<br />

2010 25.1 24.9 27.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Deposit rate (%)<br />

2008 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5<br />

2009 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5<br />

2010 2.5 2.5 2.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Lending rate (%)<br />

2008 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0<br />

2009 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0<br />

2010 6.0 6.0 6.0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Goods exports fob (US$ m)<br />

2008 5,305 4,797 4,952 5,643 5,406 6,365 6,999 6,517 4,826 4,715 3,072 2,988<br />

2009 2,397 2,570 2,157 2,747 2,676 2,866 3,267 3,409 3,326 3,710 3,214 3,427<br />

2010 3,436 2,855 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Goods imports cif (US$ m)<br />

2008 1,225 1,216 1,452 1,579 1,647 1,620 2,138 1,802 1,769 1,807 1,413 1,467<br />

2009 1,402 1,369 1,760 1,587 1,690 1,691 1,722 1,706 1,794 1,758 1,659 1,889<br />

2010 1,440 1,487 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Trade balance fob-cif (US$ m)<br />

2008 4,080 3,581 3,500 4,064 3,758 4,745 4,860 4,716 3,057 2,908 1,659 1,521<br />

2009 995 1,201 397 1,159 986 1,175 1,546 1,703 1,532 1,952 1,555 1,538<br />

2010 1,996 1,368 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Foreign-exchange reserves excl gold (US$ m)<br />

2008 82,276 83,293 87,143 89,049 89,983 90,802 94,510 94,365 97,605 89,864 89,223 92,313<br />

2009 90,401 90,423 91,075 93,996 93,635 91,663 95,378 98,682 100,219 99,673 102,184 99,026<br />

2010 98,337 97,431 97,117 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />

Sources: IMF, International Financial Statistics; Direction of Trade Statistics; Haver Analytics.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 21<br />

Annual trends charts<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

-2.0<br />

-4.0<br />

35.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

-5.0<br />

Others<br />

36.0%<br />

Spain<br />

7.9%<br />

France<br />

8.4%<br />

Real GDP growth<br />

(% change)<br />

2005<br />

Budget balance<br />

(% of GDP)<br />

Pl ea se se e g ra phi c bel ow<br />

Annual trends charts<br />

Consumer price inflation<br />

(av; %)<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit. Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

2005<br />

Libya<br />

Libya<br />

06<br />

06<br />

Middle East and North Africa<br />

07<br />

08<br />

09<br />

Middle East and North Africa<br />

07<br />

08<br />

09<br />

10<br />

10<br />

Current-account balance<br />

(% of GDP)<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit. Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

Leading markets, 2009<br />

Leading suppliers, 2009<br />

(share of total) (share of total)<br />

Italy<br />

37.6%<br />

Germany<br />

10.1%<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit. Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

World<br />

11<br />

11<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

45.0<br />

40.0<br />

35.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

Others<br />

55.1%<br />

2005<br />

Libya<br />

Libya<br />

2005<br />

06<br />

06<br />

Middle East and North Africa<br />

07<br />

08<br />

09<br />

Middle East and North Africa<br />

07<br />

08<br />

09<br />

10<br />

10<br />

World<br />

11<br />

11<br />

Italy<br />

17.1%<br />

China<br />

9.9%<br />

Turkey<br />

9.0%<br />

Germany<br />

8.9%


22 Libya<br />

Monthly trends charts<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

Consumer price inflation<br />

(% change, year on year)<br />

-2.0<br />

Jan<br />

2007<br />

Apr Jul<br />

8,000<br />

7,000<br />

6,000<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

18.0<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

Oct<br />

Jan<br />

08<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

Foreign trade<br />

(US$ m; goods only)<br />

Exports<br />

0<br />

Jan<br />

2007<br />

Apr Jul<br />

Apr<br />

Jul<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

Natural gas: Europe price<br />

(US$/BTU m)<br />

6.0<br />

Jan<br />

2007<br />

Apr Jul<br />

Oct<br />

Oct<br />

Jan<br />

08<br />

Imports<br />

Jan<br />

08<br />

Apr<br />

Apr<br />

Jul<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

Jul<br />

Oct<br />

Oct<br />

Jan<br />

09<br />

Oct<br />

Pl ea se se e g ra phi c bel ow<br />

Apr<br />

Balance<br />

Jan<br />

09<br />

Jan<br />

09<br />

Apr<br />

Jul<br />

Apr<br />

Jul<br />

Monthly trends charts<br />

Oct<br />

Jul<br />

Oct<br />

Jan<br />

10<br />

Oct<br />

Jan<br />

10<br />

Apr<br />

Jan<br />

10<br />

Apr<br />

Monetary aggregates<br />

(% change, year on year)<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

Foreign-exchange reserves<br />

(US$ m)<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

Oil: Brent crude price<br />

(US$/b; av)<br />

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

105,000<br />

95,000<br />

85,000<br />

75,000<br />

65,000<br />

55,000<br />

Jan<br />

2007<br />

Apr Jul<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

M1<br />

0<br />

Jan<br />

2007<br />

Apr Jul<br />

20<br />

Jan<br />

2007<br />

Apr Jul<br />

Oct<br />

Oct<br />

Oct<br />

M2<br />

Jan<br />

08<br />

Jan<br />

08<br />

Jan<br />

08<br />

Apr<br />

Apr<br />

Apr<br />

Jul<br />

Jul<br />

Jul<br />

Oct<br />

Oct<br />

Oct<br />

Jan<br />

09<br />

Jan<br />

09<br />

Jan<br />

09<br />

Apr<br />

Apr<br />

Apr<br />

Jul<br />

Jul<br />

Jul<br />

Oct<br />

Oct<br />

Oct<br />

Jan<br />

10<br />

Jan<br />

10<br />

Jan<br />

10<br />

Apr


Libya 23<br />

Comparative economic indicators<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Iran<br />

United Arab Emirates<br />

Israel<br />

Egypt<br />

Algeria<br />

Kuwait<br />

Qatar<br />

Morocco<br />

Iraq<br />

Libya<br />

Sudan<br />

Syria<br />

Oman<br />

Tunisia<br />

Lebanon<br />

Yemen<br />

Jordan<br />

Bahrain<br />

Qatar<br />

Lebanon<br />

Syria<br />

Morocco<br />

Egypt<br />

Iraq<br />

Sudan<br />

Yemen<br />

Bahrain<br />

Tunisia<br />

Jordan<br />

Algeria<br />

Oman<br />

Israel<br />

Iran<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Libya<br />

United Arab Emirates<br />

Kuwait<br />

Pl ea se se e g ra phi c bel ow<br />

Gross domestic product<br />

(US$ bn; market exchange rates)<br />

Gross domestic product<br />

(% change, year on year)<br />

Comparative economic indicators, 2009<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400<br />

Sources: Economist Intelligence Unit estimates; national sources.<br />

-6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0<br />

Sources: Economist Intelligence Unit estimates; national sources.<br />

United Arab Emirates<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Gross domestic product per head<br />

(US$ '000; market exchange rates)<br />

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0<br />

Sources: Economist Intelligence Unit estimates; national sources.<br />

Consumer prices<br />

(% change, year on year)<br />

Sources: Economist Intelligence Unit estimates; national sources.<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010<br />

Qatar<br />

Kuwait<br />

Israel<br />

Bahrain<br />

Oman<br />

Libya<br />

Lebanon<br />

Iran<br />

Algeria<br />

Tunisia<br />

Jordan<br />

Morocco<br />

Syria<br />

Iraq<br />

Egypt<br />

Sudan<br />

Yemen<br />

Iran<br />

Egypt<br />

Sudan<br />

Algeria<br />

Yemen<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Kuwait<br />

Tunisia<br />

Oman<br />

Israel<br />

Bahrain<br />

Syria<br />

Libya<br />

United Arab Emirates<br />

Lebanon<br />

Morocco<br />

Jordan<br />

Iraq<br />

Qatar<br />

59.3<br />

38.2<br />

36.8<br />

13.5<br />

11.8<br />

11.3<br />

-6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0


24 Libya<br />

Land area<br />

Population<br />

Main towns<br />

Climate<br />

Weather in Tripoli<br />

Language<br />

Measures<br />

Currency<br />

Time<br />

Public holidays<br />

<strong>Country</strong> snapshot<br />

Basic data<br />

1,759,540 sq km<br />

6.16m (2007 mid-year estimate, IMF)<br />

Population in '000 (2003 estimates, National Authority for Information and<br />

Documentation)<br />

Tripoli (capital) 1,149<br />

Benghazi 636<br />

Misurata 360<br />

Al Mirqab 328<br />

Al Bitnan 142<br />

Sebha 126<br />

Hot and dry with mild winters<br />

Hottest month, August, 22-30°C (average daily minimum and maximum);<br />

coldest month, January, 8-16°C; driest month, July, 1 mm average rainfall; wettest<br />

month, December, 94 mm average rainfall<br />

Arabic<br />

Metric<br />

Libyan dinar (LD) = 1,000 dirham. Average official exchange rate in 2009:<br />

LD1.21:US$1<br />

2 hours ahead of GMT<br />

Commercial offices and government establishments are closed on Fridays.<br />

Other than the usual Islamic celebrations, national holidays include Declaration<br />

of the People's Power Day (March 3rd); Evacuation Day (June 11th); Revolution<br />

Day (July 23rd); and National Day (September 1st)<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010


Libya 25<br />

Official name<br />

Form of state<br />

Head of state<br />

Executive<br />

Legislature<br />

Key ministers<br />

Secretariat of the General<br />

People's Congress<br />

National Oil Corporation<br />

chairman<br />

Central Bank governor<br />

Political structure<br />

The Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya<br />

Since 1977 Libya has been a jamahiriya (republic of the people) in accordance with the<br />

Third Universal Theory propounded by Muammar Qadhafi in his Green Book, which is a<br />

blend of socialist and Islamic theories inspired by tribal traditions. The jamahiriya system<br />

defines the political and social order, which is also governed by the Holy Quran. The<br />

General People's Congress is the highest legislative body. In 1992 Colonel Qadhafi<br />

changed the political structure by dividing Libya into 1,500 mahallat (communes), each<br />

with its own budget and legislative and executive powers, formerly vested in the Basic<br />

People's Congresses. The mahallat and the congresses are supervised by Revolutionary<br />

Committees directed by secretaries, who are chosen personally by Colonel Qadhafi<br />

Colonel Qadhafi was appointed supreme leader by the General People's Congress in<br />

March 1990 after taking power in a coup in 1969. Saif Qadhafi was put forward as general<br />

co-ordinator of the Popular Social Command in October 2009 with power over the<br />

legislature<br />

In 2000 Colonel Qadhafi abolished most central government executive functions,<br />

devolving responsibilities to the 26 municipal councils that make up the General People's<br />

Congress. Centralised control is maintained over the economy, finance, defence and<br />

security, energy, infrastructure, foreign affairs, social security and trade portfolios, the<br />

heads of which all report directly to the prime minister's office<br />

The General People's Congress, delegates to which are chosen by the Basic People's<br />

Congresses<br />

Secretary of General People's<br />

Committee (prime minister) Baghdadi al-Mahmudi<br />

Agriculture & fisheries Abu Bakr al-Mabruk al-Mansouri<br />

Communications Mohammed Ali Zeidan<br />

Economy, industry & trade Mohammed Ali al-Huwaij<br />

Education & scientific research Abdel-Kabir al-Fakhri<br />

Energy Ali Shamikh Mohammed<br />

Finance & planning Abdel-Hafez Zleitni<br />

Foreign affairs & international<br />

co-operation Mousa Kousa<br />

Health & environment Mohammed Mahmoud al-Hijazi<br />

Industry & mines Ali Yusuf Zikri<br />

Justice Mustafa Mohammed Abdel-Jalil<br />

National security Abdel-Fattah al-Ubaidi<br />

Social affairs Ibrahim al-Zarruq<br />

Utilities Matouq Mohammed Matouq<br />

Foreign affairs Suleiman Sasi al-Shahumi<br />

Popular Committees Huda Fathi bin Amir<br />

Popular Congresses Ibrahim Abderrahman Abjad<br />

Secretary (speaker) Mohammed Abdul Quasim al-Zwai<br />

Shokri Ghanem<br />

Farhat Omar Bengdara<br />

<strong>Country</strong> <strong>Report</strong> August 2010 www.eiu.com © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!