WWF Guide to Building REDD+ Strategies

© JULIE PUDLOWSKI / WWF
intRoduCtion
Monitoring, measuring, reporting and
verification (MMRV) systems can be broken
down into four major components: forest
monitoring (M1), measurement (M2),
reporting systems (R) and verification (V).
These concepts are frequently, and often
confusingly, interchanged, and their difference
is seldom elaborated. Here we will show
how these systems differ and how together
they constitute the backbone of REDD+
implementation by providing a resource
tracking and inventory system of land use and
land-use change and their related emissions.
Throughout this chapter we will refer to the
three different systems outlined below:
Forest monitoring (M1) systems are the
physical and technological systems that are
used to generate forest-cover data and detect
and quantify changes observed in forest cover
(including above- and below-ground biomass,
forest types, canopy density, etc.). The
information that we collect in our forest
monitoring systems are the primary data
source and are therefore critical for the
overall accuracy and precision of our MMRV
system. As such, forest monitoring systems
need to be comprehensive enough to allow
the tracking of all forests in a country as well
as sensitive enough to be able to detect forest
presence/absence according to the country’s
forest definition.
Measurement (M2), Reporting and
Verification (M2RV) systems in contrast are a
combined set of methodologies and standards
that we use to translate our primary data
into measurable and reportable emissions
estimates that are verifiable by an external
entity or authority. For much of the purpose
of this document the external institution that
we are reporting to will be the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC); however, we might also develop
M2RVsystems under other third-party entities
such as the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS);
the Climate, Community and Biodiversity
Alliance (CCBA) or the American Carbon
Registry (ACR).
video: WHat do you need to knoW
to make tHe RiGHt deCiSion?
LEARNING SESSION 3
Monitoring, measurement, reporting and
verification (MMRV) is the combination of
the two above systems, with the purpose to
track changes in forest areas in a way that is
transparent, consistent, accurate and reduces
uncertainties. This is critical if we are to
establish whether or not our interventions
are having positive or negative effects in
forest ecosystems over time.
MMRV systems are often discussed in the
context of climate change, and therefore
measuring greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
will be important. They can also help track
a range of other indicators (e.g. biodiversity,
hydrology, cultural values). Throughout this
chapter we will predominantly be discussing
GHG emissions MMRV systems, recognizing
that developing MMRV systems across a
range of indicators will improve both the
efficiency and effectiveness of our tracking
systems.
inteRnational PoliCy Context
There are several international
standard-setting bodies for
MMRV. The most important
of these is the UNFCCC since
it sets the international legal,
regulatory and institutional framework for
forest owning countries to monitor, measure
and report on their forests. Other systems
include VCS and CCBA, which to a greater or
lesser extent influence developing country
MMRV systems. The following section will
summarize the major decisions that have
been made under the UNFCCC and where
relevant in other arenas that guide the
national and subnational context for MMRV.
COP 13: Bali, 2007
The UNFCCC has provided guidance on
MMRV dating back to the UNFCC 13th
Conference of the Parties (COP 13) in Bali
in 2007. The Bali Decision requested that
parties improve their data collection,
estimation of emissions from deforestation
and forest degradation and monitoring and
reporting capabilities. 1 It was also agreed
that parties should use their national GHG
inventories as a basis for reporting emissions
from deforestation, noting also that developing
country parties should use the IPCC Good
Practice Guidance (GPG) for Land Use,
Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) 2
and IPCC Guidelines for National GHG
inventories (see Box 1 below).
COP 15: Copenhagen, 2009
In 2009, at COP 15 in Copenhagen, developing
countries were asked to establish robust
and transparent national forest monitoring
systems 3 that use a combination of remote
sensing and ground-based forest carbon
inventory approaches for estimating emissions,
removals, forest carbon stocks and
forest area changes; and for providing
estimates that are transparent, consistent,
accurate, and reduce uncertainties. 4
COP 16: Cancun, 2010
In 2010, at COP 16 in Cancun further
guidance was given on ways to integrate
subnational monitoring systems into national
monitoring systems, including provisions for
reporting on how displacement of emissions
is being addressed. 5 Importantly Cancun
created a roadmap for parties to discuss
forest monitoring systems and MRV systems
(MMRV) with an agreement scheduled for
COP 17 in Durban.
WWF FOREST AND CLIMATE INITIATIVE monitoRinG, meaSuRement, RePoRtinG and veRiFiCation // 51