13.06.2013 Views

Effectiveness of Laxatives in the Elderly - NIHR Health Technology ...

Effectiveness of Laxatives in the Elderly - NIHR Health Technology ...

Effectiveness of Laxatives in the Elderly - NIHR Health Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

effectiveness and high acceptability and<br />

compliance have been claimed for some<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se simple treatments.<br />

• Pattee and West (1988) supplemented <strong>the</strong><br />

diets <strong>of</strong> 24 nurs<strong>in</strong>g-home residents with a<br />

dietary fibre product consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 75%<br />

powdered cellulose (equivalent to 6–12 mg<br />

<strong>of</strong> dietary fibre) over a 99-day period. Frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> bowel movement and laxative <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />

were monitored dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> study, and <strong>the</strong><br />

rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention was compared with that<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> month preced<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> supplementation<br />

programme. The majority <strong>of</strong> residents ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

experienced significant reductions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> laxative <strong>in</strong>tervention or ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed an<br />

acceptable frequency <strong>of</strong> bowel movement.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention with laxatives<br />

was reduced from 72% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> observation<br />

days pre-study to 3–7% dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> study.<br />

The powdered cellulose fibre supplement<br />

was found to be convenient and palatable,<br />

with only two residents withdraw<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

<strong>the</strong> trial.<br />

• Hagberg and colleagues (1987) supplemented<br />

<strong>the</strong> diets <strong>of</strong> 21 elderly nurs<strong>in</strong>g-home patients<br />

(mean age 89 years) with bran. Fluid <strong>in</strong>take was<br />

also <strong>in</strong>creased. Bowel movement frequency was<br />

improved with no adverse effects.<br />

• Groth (1988) compared <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />

bran <strong>in</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g constipation <strong>in</strong> 22 orthopaedic<br />

patients (mean age 69 years). Bran<br />

supplementation <strong>in</strong>creased frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

bowel movements and stool consistency.<br />

• Odes (1993) studied <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> a high<br />

dietary fibre breakfast cereal conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

oats, wheat and soya bean and found<br />

it improved frequency <strong>of</strong> bowel movement<br />

and stool consistency, and use <strong>of</strong> laxatives<br />

was reduced.<br />

These and o<strong>the</strong>r observational studies report<br />

that <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> bulk<strong>in</strong>g agents such as fibre<br />

to <strong>the</strong> diet <strong>of</strong> elderly patients is an effective<br />

means <strong>of</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g constipation (Hull et al,<br />

1980; Meier et al, 1990; Pr<strong>in</strong>gle et al, 1984;<br />

Richards-Hall et al, 1995; Rodrigues-Fisher<br />

et al, 1993).<br />

Observational studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> fruit<br />

mixtures have also been described. One comparative<br />

study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditional Ch<strong>in</strong>ese treatment,<br />

mulberry, found marked improvements<br />

<strong>in</strong> both bowel movement frequency and<br />

<strong>Health</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Assessment 1997; Vol. 1: No. 13<br />

consistency (M<strong>in</strong>ghan & Zhu, 1989). Beverley<br />

and Travis (1992) described <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a “natural<br />

laxative mixture” <strong>in</strong> 35 geriatric patients. The<br />

mixture, which comprised prunes, currants,<br />

figs, dates and prune concentrate, was shown<br />

to be very effective. Frequency <strong>of</strong> bowel movement<br />

and stool consistency improved and<br />

laxative costs were reduced.<br />

In a non-randomised comparative study,<br />

Gibson and colleagues (1995) added a mixture<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kellogg’s All Bran ® , apple sauce and prune<br />

juice (2 tablespoons per day) to <strong>the</strong> diet <strong>of</strong><br />

45 patients on a geriatric ward and found that<br />

treated patients were significantly less likely than<br />

controls to require enemas or laxatives, with no<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> side-effects. A laxative jam <strong>of</strong> dates<br />

and prunes has also been reported to be effective<br />

<strong>in</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g constipation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hospitalised<br />

elderly by Durand and colleagues (1991), and a<br />

laxative pudd<strong>in</strong>g has been claimed to be effective<br />

<strong>in</strong> a small study among <strong>the</strong> homebound elderly<br />

(Neal, 1995). Behm (1985) also reported that<br />

<strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> a ‘special recipe’ <strong>of</strong> bran, apple<br />

sauce and prune juice to <strong>the</strong> diets <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong><br />

nurs<strong>in</strong>g-home patients with physical and mental<br />

disabilities resulted <strong>in</strong> improved stool consistency<br />

and reduced laxative use.<br />

Stewart and colleagues (1997) reported <strong>the</strong> use<br />

<strong>of</strong> dietary strategy for prevent<strong>in</strong>g constipation<br />

<strong>in</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> UK psychogeriatric patients aged<br />

68–102 years. This <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>creased amounts<br />

<strong>of</strong> cereals, fruit and vegetables, and soups and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r fluids. This added £0.20 per head to <strong>the</strong><br />

daily ward food bill but laxative use became<br />

negligible. However, <strong>the</strong>re is no quantitative<br />

data <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study and few o<strong>the</strong>r details.<br />

There is also one study <strong>in</strong> which a community<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention aimed at reduc<strong>in</strong>g laxative sales and<br />

promot<strong>in</strong>g consumption <strong>of</strong> wholemeal/wholemeal<br />

bread by <strong>the</strong> elderly is reported (Egger et al, 1991).<br />

Small retirement communities <strong>in</strong> New South Wales,<br />

Australia, were targeted us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me, Bread:<br />

It’s a Great Way to Go. There was a 49% decrease<br />

<strong>in</strong> laxative sales and a 58% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sales <strong>of</strong><br />

wholemeal/wholegra<strong>in</strong> bread <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> group at<br />

which <strong>the</strong> community organisation strategy,<br />

<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> media and social market<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

was aimed.<br />

Fluid <strong>in</strong>take<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> fluid <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> diet is also worth<br />

mention<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this context. It has been suggested<br />

that fluid <strong>in</strong>take may play an important role <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g development <strong>of</strong> constipation<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!