Effectiveness of Laxatives in the Elderly - NIHR Health Technology ...
Effectiveness of Laxatives in the Elderly - NIHR Health Technology ...
Effectiveness of Laxatives in the Elderly - NIHR Health Technology ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
52<br />
Appendix 4<br />
Heitland and Mauersberger (1988) –<br />
Osmotic versus osmotic<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 60 chronically constipated patients<br />
(approximate age range 37–68 years) received<br />
ei<strong>the</strong>r Lactitol or lactulose over <strong>the</strong> 2-week study<br />
period dur<strong>in</strong>g which bowel movement frequency<br />
was monitored. The treatments were equally<br />
effective <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g frequency, with patients<br />
receiv<strong>in</strong>g ei<strong>the</strong>r treatment produc<strong>in</strong>g a bowel<br />
movement on approximately three-quarters <strong>of</strong><br />
study days, and consistency <strong>of</strong> stools was similar<br />
for both treatments. Both treatments were well<br />
tolerated. (No quality assessment score has<br />
been awarded as <strong>the</strong> paper has not been<br />
fully translated.)<br />
Bobbio and colleagues (1995) –<br />
Osmotic versus osmotic plus fibre<br />
In a double-bl<strong>in</strong>d RCT, 40 patients aged between<br />
48 years and 84 years were treated with ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
lactulose or lactulose plus glucomannan (soluble<br />
fibre) for 4 weeks. At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> treatment<br />
period, <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> stools per week was<br />
slightly higher with lactulose alone (6.55 versus<br />
5.75). The comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>the</strong>rapy was associated<br />
with significantly lower <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> flatulence,<br />
meteorism and diarrhoea. (No quality assessment<br />
score has been awarded as <strong>the</strong> paper has not<br />
been fully translated.)<br />
Bruckschen and Horosiewicz (1994) –<br />
Osmotic versus o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
In this open trial, E. coli (‘microbiological<br />
treatment’) was compared with lactulose <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> 108 adults aged > 18 years<br />
over a 14-week period. Frequency was significantly<br />
higher with <strong>the</strong> microbiological <strong>the</strong>rapy<br />
than with lactulose (6.3 versus 5.5 stools per<br />
week). Consistency and ease <strong>of</strong> defecation<br />
was also superior with E. coli treatment. Adverse<br />
events were significantly higher with lactulose<br />
<strong>the</strong>rapy. (No quality assessment score has<br />
been awarded as <strong>the</strong> paper has not been<br />
fully translated.)<br />
Baldarassi and colleagues (1980) –<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r versus o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
In this s<strong>in</strong>gle-bl<strong>in</strong>ded RCT, three herbal<br />
preparations conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g vary<strong>in</strong>g quantities<br />
<strong>of</strong> potentially-laxative agents such as boldo,<br />
rhubarb, bile acids and phenolphthale<strong>in</strong><br />
were compared. Frequency, consistency and<br />
tolerance were assessed and <strong>the</strong> authors concluded<br />
that <strong>the</strong> three mixtures differ markedly<br />
<strong>in</strong> effectiveness. (No quality assessment score<br />
has been awarded as <strong>the</strong> paper has not been<br />
fully translated.)<br />
Unpublished data<br />
One unpublished RCT was supplied by a<br />
drug manufacturer. In this, Codalax ® was<br />
compared with lactulose <strong>in</strong> patients aged<br />
over 60 years. This study was not <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
as <strong>the</strong> patients <strong>in</strong>cluded did not appear to<br />
be chronically constipated.<br />
References<br />
Ashraf W, Park F, L<strong>of</strong> J, Quigley EM, 1995. Effects <strong>of</strong><br />
psyllium <strong>the</strong>rapy on stool characteristics, colon transit.<br />
Aliment Pharmacol Ther;9:639–47.<br />
Baldarassi R, de Ritis G, Roscioni C, et al,<br />
1980. Studio cl<strong>in</strong>icao comparativo fra tre<br />
farmaci ad azione lassative. Cl<strong>in</strong> Ter;94:67–75.<br />
Bobbio F, Giussani E, Zaccala G, 1995. Studio<br />
comparativo di un preparato di associazione di<br />
lattulosio e glucomannano (Dimalosio) con lattulosio<br />
nel trattamento della stipsi abituale. Rass Int Cl<strong>in</strong><br />
Ter;75:313–22.<br />
Bruckschen E, Horosiewicz HC, 1994. Chronische<br />
Obstipation: Vergleich von mikrobiologischer Therapie<br />
und Lactulose. Münch Med Wochenschr;136:241–5.<br />
Cantal R, Tasias J, Bada J, Asensio J, 1977. Treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
constipation with sulisat<strong>in</strong>: a double-bl<strong>in</strong>d study. Cl<strong>in</strong><br />
Ther;1:216–18.<br />
Hammer B, Ravelli GP, 1992. Chronische funktionelle<br />
obstipation. Ther Schweiz;8:328–5.<br />
Heitland W, Mauersberger H, 1988. [A cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />
compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> laxative effect <strong>of</strong> lactitol to that <strong>of</strong><br />
lactulose <strong>in</strong> a randomised open parallel study]. Schweiz<br />
Rundsch Med Prax;77:493–5.<br />
Matek W, Frühmorgen P, Riemann JJ, Deml<strong>in</strong>g L, 1982.<br />
Die Behqandlung der chronischen Obstipation mit<br />
quellende Substanzen. Fortschr Med;(1–2):16–19.<br />
Möllenbr<strong>in</strong>k M, Bruckschen E, 1994. Behandlung der<br />
chronischen Obstipation mit physiologischen E-Coli<br />
Bakterien. Med Kl<strong>in</strong>;89:587–93.<br />
Reichard H, Dahl A, Hermansson T, et al, 1990. A<br />
comparison between Testa Triticum Tricum and<br />
ispaghula <strong>in</strong> constipation. Opus C Med;35(4):121–4.<br />
Sculati O, Giampiccoli G, 1984. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial <strong>of</strong> a new<br />
preparation with a high concentration <strong>of</strong> dietary fiber<br />
(Fibraform). Curr Ther Res;36:261–6.