18.06.2013 Views

TRAGIC RECOGNITION: ACTION AND IDENTITY IN ANTIGONE ...

TRAGIC RECOGNITION: ACTION AND IDENTITY IN ANTIGONE ...

TRAGIC RECOGNITION: ACTION AND IDENTITY IN ANTIGONE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

not in the agency-enhancing recognition of an identity but rather in the acknowledgment what<br />

Hannah Arendt calls the “non-sovereign” character of human action. 62<br />

* * *<br />

In order to bring Aristotle’s claims about action and character to bear on the themes of<br />

action and identity we have been discussing so far, however, we need to deal with a<br />

terminological question: what is the relationship between Aristotelian êthos and the notion of<br />

identity? After all, it might be objected that Aristotelian êthos refers not to the full range of<br />

socially contingent characteristics we bear, but to our specifically moral or ethical qualities—that<br />

is, to the virtues and vices Aristotle discusses in his ethical treatises. 63 What does character in<br />

this sense have to do with the “identities” articulated by Antigone and Creon—much less with<br />

the use of “identity” in contemporary politics, with its heavy emphasis on group membership<br />

and ascriptive characteristics rather than the moral states of individual ethical agents?<br />

We can address this question by briefly examining the meaning of êthos, both in broader<br />

context and in Aristotle’s philosophy. In an illuminating discussion of the development of the<br />

term êthos from Homer down to Aristotle, Charles Chamberlain has shown that êthos originally<br />

referred to the “haunts” of an animal—that is, to the places where animals of a particular type<br />

were typically or characteristically found. 64 The term later came to be extended to human beings<br />

and transformed in a number of ways—but far from being used exclusively to refer to the vices<br />

and virtues of individuals, it was also used to refer to “the peculiarities which people of a certain<br />

polis acquire as a result of being brought up under its particular laws and customs”; Thucydides,<br />

for example, has Pericles remind the Athenians that they were brought up in a certain êthos,<br />

which Rex Warner renders as “way of life.” 65 Importantly, then, the line of continuity that<br />

Chamberlain traces from “haunts” to “character” does not suggest some exclusive connection<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!