19.06.2013 Views

Fascist Spectacle.pdf

Fascist Spectacle.pdf

Fascist Spectacle.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Fascist</strong> <strong>Spectacle</strong> http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft18700444&chunk.id=0&doc.v...<br />

We are all vindicating Victory. . . . We are in sum decided to defend at any cost the Revolution within and Italy's rights in<br />

the world. [80]<br />

To those who uselessly want to worry the world by representing an Italian imperialism, we will remind them yet another<br />

time that Italy contains its expenses for arms within the limits of the most elementary necessities of security and<br />

defense. We will remind them that Italy wants to live in peace with all people, and in particular with those next to her;<br />

that Italy has stipulated friendship and trade treaties with many states, and that frequently these acts have dispersed<br />

fog, thwarted intrigues, reestablished equilibrium in the spirits; we will remind them that Italy, since it is engaged in the<br />

interior in her work of economic and political reconstruction . . . does not want to disturb peace, but is ready to defend<br />

her interests in any part of the world. [81]<br />

Fascism's ambiguous rhetoric gyrated between peaceful proposals and warlike threats. But the<br />

latter were presented as consequences; other countries' malignant behavior determined Italy's military<br />

stance. As Mussolini told the Senate in 1925:<br />

One cannot think, honorable Senators, that an eventual war tomorrow in Europe would spare us the sacrifice. We need to<br />

get ready. Nor can one think that the war starts and leaves us the time to get ready. War can fall on us suddenly. [82]<br />

― 166 ―<br />

Mussolini firmly asserted Italy's duty to be militarily prepared, although he cast Italy less as the<br />

initiator of any potential conflict than as its victim. The war would "fall" on Italians suddenly, without<br />

them knowing it. Whether ready or not, Italy would be involved in the battle. There was no chance<br />

that the sacrifice could be avoided.<br />

The frustration over the European nations' unwillingness to help Italy achieve its goals through<br />

peaceful means led Mussolini to take a more militant tone in his speeches of the early 1930s. At this<br />

time, the regime's discourse on war escalated, though it maintained the familiar narrative format,<br />

especially in its second variant. On May 11, 1930, Mussolini thus addressed the people of Livorno:<br />

I want to tell you, and not only you, but all the Italian people and also the people beyond the borders, that we are not<br />

anxious for precipitous adventures, but if anybody made an attempt on our independence and future, they do not know<br />

yet at what temperature I would bring all the Italian people! [83]<br />

Things had come to a turning point when the regime could legitimately claim its right to respond<br />

to other nations' threats. If Italy the virtuous were provoked, then it would defend itself, as Mussolini<br />

reiterated in his Milan speech of May 24, 1930, anniversary of Italy's intervention in the Great War. At<br />

this event, Mussolini first warned the Italian people not to be deceived by the "bleating of lambs who<br />

are authentic wolves." [84] Then he affirmed that the Italian people were armed—i.e., "ready to defend<br />

their right under the sign of the Littorio ." [85] Then he evoked the injustice of Versailles:<br />

We left Versailles with a mutilated Victory. But Victory is still in our hands. It was mutilated in the diplomatic protocols,<br />

but it is not mutilated in our arms and hearts. [86]<br />

This highly dramatic address asked the whole of Italy to share the same emotions and feel the<br />

injustice. In the wake of these sentiments, Mussolini's message for Year IX of the regime (October 27,<br />

1930) responded to the accusations that his recent speeches in Tuscany and Milan were a declaration<br />

of war. Mussolini denounced what he called "a state of 'moral' war against us" by a "hypocritical<br />

Europe that stutters peace in Geneva and prepares war everywhere." [87] He then accused the League<br />

of Nations of being responsible for "perpetually maintaining two categories of states: armed and<br />

unarmed ones." [88] What kind of justice was this? Mussolini asked. What judicial and moral equality<br />

could exist between armed and unarmed states?<br />

― 167 ―<br />

The principles guiding the League were unfair, and Italy as a victim was paying the price. "Some<br />

injustices have been committed, also against us, above all against us," Mussolini told the people of<br />

Milan on October 25, 1932. [89] He continued: "And nothing is more sad than the task, which<br />

sometimes we need to take, of having to defend what has been the magnificent sacrifice of blood of all<br />

the Italian people." [90] Debased, wealthy nations were denying Italy the rights it had earned through<br />

the sacrifice and blood of millions of soldiers. The rhetoric of blood, which Mussolini had adopted for<br />

the cult of fascist martyrs, resurfaced in the regime's representation of Italy's moral stance in world<br />

politics. The sanctified blood of war heroes functioned to dramatize further the degree of injustice to<br />

which Italy was being subjected. The image of Italy as virtuous victim served Mussolini's attempt to<br />

98 of 199 7/11/2006 12:54 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!