20.06.2013 Views

Fuselage self-propulsion by static-pressure thrust - CAFE Foundation

Fuselage self-propulsion by static-pressure thrust - CAFE Foundation

Fuselage self-propulsion by static-pressure thrust - CAFE Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Configuration<br />

Integrated Conf. 00<br />

Integrated Conf. 01<br />

Integrated Conf . 02<br />

Integrated Conf. 12<br />

Body/Wake-Propeller 1<br />

Bady/Wake-Propeller 2<br />

Body/Jet-Propulsion A<br />

Body/Jet-Propulsion B<br />

Body/Jet-Propulsion C<br />

Body/Jet-Propulsion D<br />

Body/Jet-Propulsion E<br />

Body/Jet-Propulsion F<br />

Table V - Propulsion Evaluation Summary<br />

=2rlO)<br />

6<br />

0.33<br />

d/Y Lm-<br />

0.147 0.0118<br />

0.147 0.0115<br />

0.147 0 0124<br />

0.163 0.0150<br />

0.351 0.0869<br />

0.240 0.0415<br />

0.0846 0.0115<br />

0.0861 0.0124<br />

0.0969 0.0150<br />

0.147 0.0250<br />

0.147 0.0260<br />

0.163 0.0312<br />

among aeronautical engineers, that the best that can<br />

be done with axial <strong>pressure</strong> forces is to achieve near<br />

zero <strong>pressure</strong> drag with unseparated concave aftbodies.<br />

In this study, the integration of the radial <strong>pressure</strong><br />

17,20<br />

distribution of the <strong>self</strong>-propelled Conf. 10<br />

(transition tripped at 10% length) yielded a <strong>thrust</strong> of<br />

0.0166; the agreement with the above 0.0168 is indeed<br />

remarkable, as it demonstrates the nature of this<br />

<strong>thrust</strong> force.<br />

- C pt VjD0<br />

0.970 0.674<br />

0.965 0.669<br />

1.05 0.715<br />

1.044 0.690<br />

1.10 0.961<br />

1.18 0.987<br />

4.17 2.043<br />

4.53 2.129<br />

4.13 2.033<br />

2.18 1.479<br />

2.36 1.536<br />

2.24 1.497<br />

-Pj G - CHPS_<br />

0.52 0.0139<br />

0.52 0.0128<br />

0.54 0.0141<br />

0.57 0.0182<br />

0.175 0.0271<br />

0.191 0.0318<br />

-0.10 0.0417<br />

-0.10 0.0500<br />

"0.10 0.0537<br />

"0.10 0.0337<br />

-0.10 0.0404<br />

"0.10 0.0443<br />

Ips-<br />

172.6%<br />

187.5%<br />

198.5%<br />

170.3%<br />

103.0%<br />

88.0%<br />

57.5%<br />

55.9%<br />

57.7%<br />

71.0%<br />

69.3%<br />

69.9%<br />

are below 0.2 and the body/jet-propulsor systems are In 1983 Goldschmied" presented the experimental<br />

practically at the free-stream level, with values wind-tunnel evidence that the <strong>self</strong>-propelled freebelow<br />

0.1.<br />

transition models (Confs. 00 and 01) were in<br />

It is quite evident that the integrated system equilibrium flight with jet total-head equal to free<br />

presents <strong>propulsion</strong> characteristics which are far stream's and jet velocities less than 70% free<br />

superior to, and radically different from, those of stream's. In this study integration of the radial<br />

conventional systems.<br />

<strong>pressure</strong> distributions seem to yield <strong>thrust</strong> much<br />

greater than the computed skin-friction O.?lO; there<br />

VI. Summarl:<br />

can be no doubt that body <strong>self</strong>-<strong>propulsion</strong> has been<br />

achieved <strong>by</strong> <strong>static</strong>-<strong>pressure</strong> <strong>thrust</strong>, with all the power<br />

Thirty years ago the experimental wind-tunnel data applied to BLC and none to reaction <strong>thrust</strong>. This is<br />

of Cerreta' demonstrated conclusively a 40% reduction indeed a significant milestone in applied aerodynamics<br />

in "equivalent drag" (including BLC power) as against for General Aviation aircraft.<br />

a streamlined body of equal volume, with transition A propulsive efficiency evaluation was also carried<br />

tripped at 10% length on both bodies; this voided the out, on the basis of the conventional badylwakestill<br />

popular "flat-plate syndrome" that substantial propeller and body/jet-<strong>thrust</strong>er configurations; the<br />

body drag reductions can only be achieved through efficiency index ranged from 88% to 103% and from 55%<br />

laminar skin-friction.<br />

to 70%, respectively. On the other hand, for the<br />

The same Cerreta data also showed experimental <strong>self</strong>-propelled Goldschmied system the efficiency index<br />

wake-drags as low as 0.0022, while the computed ranged from 172% to 198%; also it is well worth noting<br />

turbulent skin-friction drag was 0.0190; clearly a that the mass flow required was only 15% of that for<br />

body <strong>thrust</strong> force of 0.0168 had to occur to make this the best wake-propeller and 50% of that for the jethappen.<br />

This voided another belief, still current <strong>thrust</strong>er with equal jet diameter.<br />

-18-<br />

YII. Conclusions<br />

In conclusion, since the fuselage represents at<br />

least 50% of the total aircraft drag, fuselage <strong>self</strong>-<br />

<strong>propulsion</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>static</strong>-<strong>pressure</strong> <strong>thrust</strong> should yield at<br />

'W<br />

least 25% total power reduction.<br />

A preliminary design study <strong>by</strong> F. R. Goldschmied<br />

(1984)" for 200 MPE cruise speed indicates a u

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!