20.06.2013 Views

A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...

A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...

A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW<br />

Japan<br />

Violence Against <strong>Women</strong><br />

Sexual Harassment<br />

Kanazawa Sexual Harassment <str<strong>on</strong>g>Case</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Roudouhanrei No. 707, pp. 37-49<br />

Nagoya High Court, Kanazawa Branch<br />

1 March 1997<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Law</str<strong>on</strong>g>s C<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

Civil Code, Articles 44.1 and 709;<br />

Labour Standards <str<strong>on</strong>g>Law</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Chapter 2.<br />

This case deals with sexual harassment in employment and its place in Japanese<br />

law.<br />

An employer subjected a female employee to unwanted sexual attenti<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />

workplace. The female employee argued that <strong>the</strong> unwanted sexual attenti<strong>on</strong> from<br />

her employer took advantage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> his positi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> power. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, such acts were<br />

illegal because <strong>the</strong>y violated <strong>the</strong> petiti<strong>on</strong>er’s dignity and right to sexual freedom.<br />

Decisi<strong>on</strong><br />

The Court decided in favour <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> female employee and held that <strong>the</strong> employer’s<br />

“acts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> obscenity by compulsi<strong>on</strong>” were illegal because <strong>the</strong>y were bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong><br />

socially permissible limit and <strong>the</strong>refore violated <strong>the</strong> petiti<strong>on</strong>er’s dignity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

pers<strong>on</strong>ality, her sexual freedom and her right to sexual determinati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Commentary<br />

This case is significant because it set a precedent in relati<strong>on</strong> to sexual harassment. It<br />

was <strong>the</strong> first High Court case in Japan to recognise an acti<strong>on</strong> for sexual harassment<br />

as a distinct category. Previously, <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly avenue for sexual harassment was in<br />

libel. This is positive for women’s rights because it recognised sexual harassment<br />

as a serious and specific problem that is worthy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> attenti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> High Court.<br />

However, some have criticised <strong>the</strong> amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> compensati<strong>on</strong> awarded <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis<br />

that it is low in comparis<strong>on</strong> to similar cases in o<strong>the</strong>r countries.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!