A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Government is discriminatory. Some challenges have been made in <strong>the</strong> superior<br />
courts, using both <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al guarantee <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> equality and <strong>the</strong> obligati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>the</strong><br />
Indian Government has under CEDAW. In most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> cases which have challenged<br />
religi<strong>on</strong>-based family laws <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis that <strong>the</strong>y discriminate against women, <strong>the</strong><br />
courts have declined to intervene <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ground that <strong>the</strong> parliament and not <strong>the</strong><br />
judiciary is <strong>the</strong> appropriate forum for such matters.<br />
The first review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> India’s obligati<strong>on</strong>s under CEDAW by <strong>the</strong> CEDAW Committee was<br />
held in New York in January 2000. The Committee str<strong>on</strong>gly urged <strong>the</strong> Government<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> India, in <strong>the</strong>ir c<strong>on</strong>cluding comments <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> review, to initiate reforms in <strong>the</strong><br />
area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> family law. They also urged <strong>the</strong> Government to introduce a requirement<br />
for <strong>the</strong> compulsory registrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> marriages. However, so far, <strong>the</strong> Government has<br />
not removed or amended <strong>the</strong> reservati<strong>on</strong> or <strong>the</strong> declarati<strong>on</strong>s made when it ratified<br />
CEDAW.<br />
103<br />
CEDAW Country Ratificati<strong>on</strong> Report: India