A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Humaira Mehmood v The State and o<strong>the</strong>rs (Pakistan)<br />
which enjoins member states to take all appropriate measures in relati<strong>on</strong> to ensuring<br />
equality in matters <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> marriage and <strong>the</strong> right to c<strong>on</strong>sensual marriage (Article 16).<br />
The Court also referred to <strong>the</strong> Cairo Declarati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> in Islam 1990,<br />
which Pakistan had adopted. Articles 5 and 6 state that women have <strong>the</strong> right to enter<br />
marriage without any restricti<strong>on</strong>s stemming from race, colour or nati<strong>on</strong>ality and that<br />
<strong>the</strong> State has a duty to facilitate marriage. <strong>Women</strong> have an equal right to human<br />
dignity with men, <strong>the</strong>y also have <strong>the</strong>ir own civil entity and financial independence<br />
and <strong>the</strong> right to retain name and lineage.<br />
Commentary<br />
This judgment is significant for women’s rights in Pakistan in a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ways.<br />
Firstly, <strong>the</strong> finding was favourable for both petiti<strong>on</strong>ers validating Mst. Humaira’s<br />
choice <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> husband and censuring <strong>the</strong> police for <strong>the</strong>ir treatment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> her. Sec<strong>on</strong>dly, <strong>the</strong><br />
Court was sensitive to, and acknowledging <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>text <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> women’s rights. The<br />
Court made a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> positive comments about <strong>the</strong> place <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> women in Pakistani<br />
society describing women’s equality as a fundamental tenet <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Islam, “male<br />
chauvinism, feudal bias, and compulsi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a c<strong>on</strong>ceited ego should not be c<strong>on</strong>fused<br />
with Islamic values. An enlightened approach is called for”. By acknowledging <strong>the</strong><br />
role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> family, traditi<strong>on</strong>, and religi<strong>on</strong>, and by speaking out against <strong>the</strong> abuse <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Mst. Humaira by both <strong>the</strong> State and her family <strong>the</strong> Court made a distinctive step<br />
towards <strong>the</strong> “enlightened approach” that it encourages.<br />
Finally, <strong>the</strong> Court referred favourably to <strong>the</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al obligati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pakistan,<br />
including reference to CEDAW. Although its decisi<strong>on</strong> was based <strong>on</strong> domestic statutes<br />
and <strong>the</strong> case law <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pakistan it noted that its findings accorded with internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
instruments that protect <strong>the</strong> rights <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> women.<br />
25