A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
A Digest of Case Law on the Human Rights of Women - Asia Pacific ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CEDAW Country Ratificati<strong>on</strong> Report<br />
<strong>Pacific</strong> Regi<strong>on</strong><br />
Ratificati<strong>on</strong><br />
The following countries in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pacific</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> have ratified CEDAW:<br />
• Western Samoa <strong>on</strong> 11 January 1992;<br />
• Papua New Guinea <strong>on</strong> 11 January 1995;<br />
• Fiji Islands <strong>on</strong> 27 August 1995;<br />
• Vanuatu <strong>on</strong> 7 September 1995;<br />
• Tuvalu <strong>on</strong> 6 October 1999.<br />
Kiribati and o<strong>the</strong>r Micr<strong>on</strong>esian Islands are yet to ratify <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Reservati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
At ratificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fiji Government expressed reservati<strong>on</strong>s to Articles 5(a) and 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>. Article 5(a) provides for <strong>the</strong> modificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> practices and social<br />
and cultural patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>duct <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> men and women, which are based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> idea<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> inferiority or superiority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ei<strong>the</strong>r sex. The Government was reluctant to modify<br />
<strong>the</strong> cultural practices <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> traditi<strong>on</strong>al Fijian societies and believed modificati<strong>on</strong> would<br />
draw str<strong>on</strong>g criticism from <strong>the</strong> Fijian community. The Government also did not<br />
want CEDAW to be seen by <strong>the</strong> people as a “foreign, western document” and to<br />
combat this intended to provide educati<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>duct awareness raising about <strong>the</strong><br />
C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> and <strong>the</strong> implicati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Article 5(a) prior to removing <strong>the</strong> reservati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
At ratificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> citizenship provisi<strong>on</strong>s in Articles 26 and 27 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Fiji 1990 [“<strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>”] were inc<strong>on</strong>sistent with Article 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> CEDAW relating to<br />
nati<strong>on</strong>ality. The C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> was subsequently amended, resulting in gender-neutral<br />
provisi<strong>on</strong>s for nati<strong>on</strong>ality and residency rights <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>-citizen spouses. Articles 12(7)<br />
and 16 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> gave n<strong>on</strong>-citizen spouses married to Fijian women <strong>the</strong><br />
right to acquire Fijian citizenship or to reside in Fiji. These changes nullified <strong>the</strong><br />
reservati<strong>on</strong> to Article 9.<br />
The reservati<strong>on</strong>s to both Articles 5(a) and 9 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> have however, been<br />
subsequently withdrawn.<br />
Impact<br />
In <strong>the</strong> latter years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> last decade, <strong>the</strong> courts in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pacific</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> have cautiously<br />
begun to accept internati<strong>on</strong>al human rights instruments such as CEDAW, CRC, and<br />
ICCPR. This is especially so in <strong>the</strong> courts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fiji, where High Court judges are<br />
specifically applying internati<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s to cases, as opposed to merely quoting<br />
<strong>the</strong>m as references in <strong>the</strong>ir judgments.<br />
108