Proposed

WSR 12-21-104 Washington State Register, Issue 12-21
Field evaluation mark.
(((50))) (48) Only laboratory personnel may apply the
field evaluation mark after final acceptance of the product.
The field evaluation label must be applied on-site at the location
of the final installation, unless waived by the department.
(((51))) (49) The field evaluation laboratory must have a
system of controls and records for all field evaluation marks
it applies. The records must include labels removed or otherwise
voided.
(((52))) (50) A field evaluated product may be relocated
or fed from a different power source if not prohibited by the
field evaluation mark or the field evaluation report.
(((53))) (51) The field evaluation mark must:
(a) Not be readily transferable from one product to
another;
(b) Be directly applied by the laboratory personnel to
each unit of production in the form of labels or markings suitable
for the environment and use of the product;
(c) Include the name or other appropriate identification
of the certification laboratory; ((and))
(d) Include a unique evaluation laboratory reference
number; and
(e) Include a reference to the evaluation report or other
notation if there are any limitations of use noted within the
report.
(((54))) (52) The field evaluation laboratory must have a
system of controls and records for all field evaluation marks
it applies. The records must include labels removed or otherwise
voided. See subsection (26) of this section.
REPEALER
The following sections of the Washington Administrative
Code are repealed:
WAC 296-46B-520 Special occupancies—Theaters,
motion picture and
television studios, performance
areas and similar
areas.
WAC 296-46B-965 Training certificate required.
WSR 12-21-104
PROPOSED RULES
DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR AND INDUSTRIES
[Filed October 23, 2012, 10:56 a.m.]
Original Notice.
Preproposal statement of inquiry was filed as WSR 12-
17-122.
Title of Rule and Other Identifying Information:
Apprenticeship rules, chapter 296-05 WAC.
Hearing Location(s): Spokane Community College,
Apprenticeship and Journeyman Training Center, 2110 North
Fancher, Spokane, WA 99212, on December 5, 2012, at 9:00
a.m.; and at the Department of Labor and Industries, 7273
Proposed [ 106 ]
Linderson Way S.W., Room S119, Tumwater, WA 98501, on
December 6, 2012, at 1:00 p.m.
Date of Intended Adoption: January 22, 2013.
Submit Written Comments to: Sally Elliott, P.O. Box
44400, Olympia, WA 98504-4400, e-mail sally.elliott@lni.
wa.gov, fax (360) 902-5292, by 5 p.m. on December 6, 2012.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: Contact Sally
Elliott by November 23, 2012, at sally.elliott@lni.wa.gov or
(360) 902-6411.
Purpose of the Proposal and Its Anticipated Effects,
Including Any Changes in Existing Rules: The apprenticeship
program needs to proceed with rule making in response
to chapter 308, Laws of 2011 (SB 5584) and chapter 21,
Laws of 2011 (E2SHB 1371).
The rule making will:
• Adopt an appeal process to comply with a new
director's review for council decisions involving
federal purposes.
• Amend language that designates the department,
rather than the Washington state apprenticeship and
training council, as the rule-making authority for
apprenticeship.
• Amend language for consistency and to align the
language with the new statutory requirements.
• Amend language to allow the director, rather than
the governor, to appoint public members to the
council.
Statutory Authority for Adoption: Chapter 49.04 RCW,
chapter 308, Laws of 2011 (SB 5584) and chapter 21, Laws
of 2011 (E2SHB 1371).
Statute Being Implemented: Chapter 49.04 RCW, chapter
308, Laws of 2011 (SB 5584) and chapter 21, Laws of
2011 (E2SHB 1371).
Rule is not necessitated by federal law, federal or state
court decision.
Name of Proponent: Department of labor and industries,
governmental.
Name of Agency Personnel Responsible for Drafting,
Implementation and Enforcement: Jose Rodriguez, Tumwater,
Washington, (360) 902-6348.
No small business economic impact statement has been
prepared under chapter 19.85 RCW. The proposed rule
changes clarify language of the current rule without changing
its effect and the contents of some changes are explicitly and
specifically dictated by statute. Therefore, the department is
exempt from conducting [a] small business economic impact
statement under RCW 19.85.025(3) referencing RCW 34.05-
.310 (4)(c),(d) and (e).
A cost-benefit analysis is not required under RCW
34.05.328. The proposed rule changes clarify language of the
current rule without changing its effect and the contents of
some changes are explicitly and specifically dictated by statute.
Therefore, the department is exempt from conducting a
cost-benefit analysis under RCW 34.05.328 (5)(b)(iii).
October 23, 2012
Judy Schurke
Director