29.06.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

View/Open - ARAN - National University of Ireland, Galway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

effect on the fluorescence. As the quencher concentration increases the probability <strong>of</strong><br />

SOA quenching increases. In SOA quenching, the fluorescence intensity is reduced<br />

by the quencher but the fluorescence decay is unaffected as the observed fluorescence<br />

only comes from the uncomplexed fluorophores in the sample. The action <strong>of</strong> SOA<br />

quenching can be described by:<br />

I0<br />

I = exp(VqN[Q]) (1.9)<br />

where I0 is the incident light intensity, I is the fluorescence intensity and N is<br />

Avogadro’s number[36, 38].<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> dynamic and static quenching: The two mechanisms are com-<br />

pared in Figure 1.11.<br />

Figure 1.11: Comparison <strong>of</strong> dynamic and static quenching. Reproduced from [36]<br />

For both dynamic and static quenching, the dependence <strong>of</strong> I0/I on [Q] is lin-<br />

ear and the two mechanisms can not be distinguished by intensity measurements<br />

alone. Lifetime measurements can be used to distinguish between dynamic and<br />

static quenching. For static quenching the lifetime remains unchanged as only the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> emitting fluorophores is reduced by formation <strong>of</strong> the complex and<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!